Literature DB >> 26138912

Predicting Overall Survival After Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Development and External Validation of the Amsterdam Prognostic Model.

Alexander V Louie1, Cornelis J A Haasbeek2, Sahar Mokhles3, George B Rodrigues4, Kevin L Stephans5, Frank J Lagerwaard2, David A Palma4, Gregory M M Videtic5, Andrew Warner4, Johanna J M Takkenberg3, Chandana A Reddy5, Alex P W M Maat3, Neil M Woody5, Ben J Slotman2, Suresh Senan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prognostic model for 5-year overall survival (OS), consisting of recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and a nomogram, was developed for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A primary dataset of 703 ES-NSCLC SABR patients was randomly divided into a training (67%) and an internal validation (33%) dataset. In the former group, 21 unique parameters consisting of patient, treatment, and tumor factors were entered into an RPA model to predict OS. Univariate and multivariate models were constructed for RPA-selected factors to evaluate their relationship with OS. A nomogram for OS was constructed based on factors significant in multivariate modeling and validated with calibration plots. Both the RPA and the nomogram were externally validated in independent surgical (n = 193) and SABR (n = 543) datasets.
RESULTS: RPA identified 2 distinct risk classes based on tumor diameter, age, World Health Organization performance status (PS) and Charlson comorbidity index. This RPA had moderate discrimination in SABR datasets (c-index range: 0.52-0.60) but was of limited value in the surgical validation cohort. The nomogram predicting OS included smoking history in addition to RPA-identified factors. In contrast to RPA, validation of the nomogram performed well in internal validation (r(2) = 0.97) and external SABR (r(2) = 0.79) and surgical cohorts (r(2) = 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: The Amsterdam prognostic model is the first externally validated prognostication tool for OS in ES-NSCLC treated with SABR available to individualize patient decision making. The nomogram retained strong performance across surgical and SABR external validation datasets. RPA performance was poor in surgical patients, suggesting that 2 different distinct patient populations are being treated with these 2 effective modalities.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26138912     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of particle beam therapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and hypothesis-generating meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Chi; Haiquan Chen; Sijin Wen; Haijuan Yan; Zhongxing Liao
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Predicting 5-Year Progression and Survival Outcomes for Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Development and Validation of Robust Prognostic Nomograms.

Authors:  Jingjing Kang; Matthew S Ning; Han Feng; Hongqi Li; Houda Bahig; Eric D Brooks; James W Welsh; Rui Ye; Hongyu Miao; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Integration of Risk Survival Measures Estimated From Pre- and Posttreatment Computed Tomography Scans Improves Stratification of Patients With Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Zhicheng Jiao; Hongming Li; Ying Xiao; Charu Aggarwal; Maya Galperin-Aizenberg; Daniel Pryma; Charles B Simone; Steven J Feigenberg; Gary D Kao; Yong Fan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Predicting 2-year survival in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: the development and validation of a scoring system from an Australian cohort.

Authors:  Natalie Si-Yi Lee; Jesmin Shafiq; Matthew Field; Caroline Fiddler; Suganthy Varadarajan; Senthilkumar Gandhidasan; Eric Hau; Shalini Kavita Vinod
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival following stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Baker; Katerina Bakunina; Marloes Duijm; Mischa S Hoogeman; Robin Cornelissen; Imogeen Antonisse; John Praag; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Joost Jan Nuyttens
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Novel Harmonization Method for Multi-Centric Radiomic Studies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Bertolini; Valeria Trojani; Andrea Botti; Noemi Cucurachi; Marco Galaverni; Salvatore Cozzi; Paolo Borghetti; Salvatore La Mattina; Edoardo Pastorello; Michele Avanzo; Alberto Revelant; Matteo Sepulcri; Chiara Paronetto; Stefano Ursino; Giulia Malfatti; Niccolò Giaj-Levra; Lorenzo Falcinelli; Cinzia Iotti; Mauro Iori; Patrizia Ciammella
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Validating impact of pretreatment tumor growth rate on outcome of early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Soha Atallah; Lisa W Le; Andrea Bezjak; Robert MacRae; Andrew J Hope; Jason Pantarotto
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.