Literature DB >> 26137871

Subgroup analysis of patients with G2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Lisa Hauck1, Michael Bitzer1, Nisar Malek1, Ruben R Plentz1.   

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are malignancies with an increasing incidence rate. NETs are graded or classified by the expression level of Ki67, a proliferation marker in Grade 1 and 2 tumors. Out of 120 patients who visited our hospital between 2003 and 2012, 40 were classified as G2 NET. This study was mainly designed to investigate a new threshold for optimising the Ki67 system. Patients were subdivided into two new groups according to Ki67 (group 1 = 3-9%, group 2 = 10-20%). Twenty-five patients were allocated to group 1 and 15 to group 2. The primary tumor originated in 46% from the foregut and 68% NET were functionally active. Patients were treated in 88 versus 60% by surgery, 48 versus 80% by somatostatin analogs, 0 versus 20% by chemotherapy, 2,5 versus 0% by Everolimus and 32 versus 47% underwent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Group 1 patients showed a significantly (p = 0.01) better survival compared with group 2 and also a significant difference of Chromogranin A (p = 0.03) and alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.01). In addition, all patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase showed a significantly (p = 0.03) shorter survival. Prognostic relevance of G2 NETs may be improved by using a new boundary. Patients with Ki67 of 3-9% showed a better response to current treatment methods and significantly longer survival compared to group 2. Thus, our data clearly show that patients with higher G2 proliferation index should be treated differently. Finally, LDH has been found to be a new prognostic factor in patients with G2 NET.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G2; Ki67; NET; survival; therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26137871     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1064994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  7 in total

Review 1.  Molecular subtypes in cancers of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Maarten F Bijlsma; Anguraj Sadanandam; Patrick Tan; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Prognostic Assessment of Non-functioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms as a Basis for Risk-Adapted Resection Strategies.

Authors:  F M Watzka; F Meyer; J I Staubitz; C Fottner; A Schad; H Lang; T J Musholt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 4.  [Grading of neuroendocrine tumors].

Authors:  W Saeger; P A Schnabel; P Komminoth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Apostolos V Tsolakis; Athanasia Ragkousi; Miroslav Vujasinovic; Gregory Kaltsas; Kosmas Daskalakis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Therapy Resistant Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Kristen McClellan; Emerson Y Chen; Adel Kardosh; Charles D Lopez; Jaydira Del Rivero; Nadine Mallak; Flavio G Rocha; Yilun Koethe; Rodney Pommier; Erik Mittra; Guillaume J Pegna
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  An elevated serum alkaline phosphatase level in hepatic metastases of grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors is unusual and of prognostic value.

Authors:  Maeva Andriantsoa; Solene Hoibian; Aurelie Autret; Marine Gilabert; Anthony Sarran; Patricia Niccoli; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.