Literature DB >> 26137355

An Analysis of Relapse Rates and Predictors of Relapse in 2 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials of Desvenlafaxine for Major Depressive Disorder.

Roger S McIntyre1, Rana S Fayyad1, Christine J Guico-Pabia1, Matthieu Boucher1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relapse rates and predictors of relapse in 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of desvenlafaxine for major depressive disorder (MDD).
METHOD: Study 1: week 8 responders to open-label desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d entered a 12-week open-label stability phase. Patients with a continuing, stable response at week 20 were randomly assigned to 6-month, double-blind treatment (desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d or placebo). Study 1 was conducted between June 2009 and March 2011 at 87 sites worldwide. Study 2: week 12 responders to open-label desvenlafaxine 200 or 400 mg/d were randomly assigned to 6-month, double-blind treatment (desvenlafaxine 200 mg/d, 400 mg/d, or placebo). Study 2 was conducted between June 2003 and August 2005 at 49 sites in Europe, the United States, and Taiwan. Relapse was assessed separately by study with log-rank test using protocol definitions of relapse and with 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score ≥ 16 at any time during the double-blind phase. Kaplan-Meier estimates evaluated time to relapse, censoring data at months 1, 2, and 3 and overall; treatments were compared using hazard ratios. Cox proportional hazards models assessed relapse predictors.
RESULTS: Overall relapse rates for all definitions were significantly lower for desvenlafaxine versus placebo for both studies (all P ≤ .002). In study 1, rates were significantly lower for desvenlafaxine versus placebo at month 2 (P = .016) and month 3 (P = .007) using the protocol definition. In study 2, relapse rates were significantly lower for desvenlafaxine versus placebo at months 1, 2, and 3 for both definitions (P < .0001-.002). Hazard ratios were similar at months 1, 2, and 3 and overall for both studies (0.382-0.639).
CONCLUSIONS: Desvenlafaxine 50 to 400 mg/d effectively prevented relapse at 6 months. Desvenlafaxine significantly prevented relapse early (month 1) versus placebo only in study 2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers:NCT00887224 and NCT00075257.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26137355      PMCID: PMC4468882          DOI: 10.4088/PCC.14m01681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord        ISSN: 2155-7780


  39 in total

Review 1.  Definitions of antidepressant treatment response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, and other relevant outcomes: a focus on treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  A A Nierenberg; L M DeCecco
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  A 24-week study of 20 mg citalopram, 40 mg citalopram, and placebo in the prevention of relapse of major depression.

Authors:  S A Montgomery; J G Rasmussen; P Tanghøj
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.659

3.  Factors associated with duration of new antidepressant treatment: analysis of a large primary care database.

Authors:  Christopher Burton; Niall Anderson; Katie Wilde; Colin R Simpson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  A randomized clinical study of Lu AA21004 in the prevention of relapse in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Boulenger; Henrik Loft; Ioana Florea
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 4.153

5.  Efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d for prevention of relapse in major depressive disorder:a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joshua Z Rosenthal; Patrice Boyer; Cécile Vialet; Eunhee Hwang; Karen A Tourian
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Extended-release venlafaxine in relapse prevention for patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Simon; Loren M Aguiar; Nadia R Kunz; Dean Lei
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  Major depressive disorder: a prospective study of residual subthreshold depressive symptoms as predictor of rapid relapse.

Authors:  L L Judd; H S Akiskal; J D Maser; P J Zeller; J Endicott; W Coryell; M P Paulus; J L Kunovac; A C Leon; T I Mueller; J A Rice; M B Keller
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.839

8.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. III. Pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Raymond W Lam; Sidney H Kennedy; Sophie Grigoriadis; Roger S McIntyre; Roumen Milev; Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Sagar V Parikh; Scott B Patten; Arun V Ravindran
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Prescription patterns following first-line new generation antidepressants for depression in Japan: a naturalistic cohort study based on a large claims database.

Authors:  Toshi A Furukawa; Yoshie Onishi; Shiro Hinotsu; Aran Tajika; Nozomi Takeshima; Kiyomi Shinohara; Yusuke Ogawa; Yu Hayasaka; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Persistence and compliance to antidepressant treatment in patients with depression: a chart review.

Authors:  Norifusa Sawada; Hiroyuki Uchida; Takefumi Suzuki; Koichiro Watanabe; Toshiaki Kikuchi; Takashi Handa; Haruo Kashima
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.