BACKGROUND: It is not known how much the duration of newly prescribed antidepressant treatment is influenced by patient characteristics or practice variation. AIM: To describe the relationship between patient characteristics and the duration of new antidepressant treatment by general practices. DESIGN AND SETTING: Large primary care database cohort study of all patients with a newly initiated course of eligible antidepressant treatment during 1 year, from a database of 237 Scottish practices. METHOD: Detailed prescription data were used to estimate the duration of new antidepressant treatment for each patient. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the influence of patient characteristics on continuation of treatment and, by multilevel modelling, the variation between practices. RESULTS: A total of 28 027 (2.2%) patients commenced antidepressant treatment during the year; 75% continued beyond 30 days, 56% beyond 90 days, and 40% beyond 180 days. Treatment was less likely to be continued in patients from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: hazard ratio 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16 to 1.29); in patients under 35 years, 1.33 (95% CI = 1.28 to 1.37); and in those for whom the GP recorded no relevant diagnostic code, 1.16 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.18). Models accounted for between 2.2% and 3.9% of the variation in treatment duration. CONCLUSION: Patient demographic characteristics account for relatively little variation in the duration of new antidepressant treatment, though treatment was shorter in younger patients and those with greater socioeconomic deprivation. There is variation in treatment duration between practices and according to whether patients have a depression diagnosis coded in their records.
BACKGROUND: It is not known how much the duration of newly prescribed antidepressant treatment is influenced by patient characteristics or practice variation. AIM: To describe the relationship between patient characteristics and the duration of new antidepressant treatment by general practices. DESIGN AND SETTING: Large primary care database cohort study of all patients with a newly initiated course of eligible antidepressant treatment during 1 year, from a database of 237 Scottish practices. METHOD: Detailed prescription data were used to estimate the duration of new antidepressant treatment for each patient. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the influence of patient characteristics on continuation of treatment and, by multilevel modelling, the variation between practices. RESULTS: A total of 28 027 (2.2%) patients commenced antidepressant treatment during the year; 75% continued beyond 30 days, 56% beyond 90 days, and 40% beyond 180 days. Treatment was less likely to be continued in patients from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: hazard ratio 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16 to 1.29); in patients under 35 years, 1.33 (95% CI = 1.28 to 1.37); and in those for whom the GP recorded no relevant diagnostic code, 1.16 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.18). Models accounted for between 2.2% and 3.9% of the variation in treatment duration. CONCLUSION:Patient demographic characteristics account for relatively little variation in the duration of new antidepressant treatment, though treatment was shorter in younger patients and those with greater socioeconomic deprivation. There is variation in treatment duration between practices and according to whether patients have a depression diagnosis coded in their records.
Authors: Jill Morrison; Mary-Jane Anderson; Matt Sutton; Rosalia Munoz-Arroyo; Sara McDonald; Margaret Maxwell; Andrew Power; Michael Smith; Philip Wilson Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Anna Fernández; Alejandra Pinto-Meza; Juan Angel Bellón; Pere Roura-Poch; Josep M Haro; Jaume Autonell; Diego José Palao; María Teresa Peñarrubia; Rita Fernández; Elena Blanco; Juan Vicente Luciano; Antoni Serrano-Blanco Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Rebecca C Rossom; Susan Shortreed; Karen J Coleman; Arne Beck; Beth E Waitzfelder; Christine Stewart; Brian K Ahmedani; John E Zeber; Greg E Simon Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: F Desplenter; C Bond; M Watson; C Burton; P Murchie; A J Lee; K Lefevre; S Simoens; G Laekeman Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Chris F Johnson; Nadine J Dougall; Brian Williams; Stephen A MacGillivray; Alasdair I Buchanan; Richard D Hassett Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 2.497