Literature DB >> 26137155

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Muyou Tian1, Yahua Zhong1, Fuxiang Zhou1, Conghua Xie1, Yunfeng Zhou1, Zhengkai Liao1.   

Abstract

The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathological complete response (pCR) and survival rate in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to conduct a search of the available databases, in order to find studies performed between January 2006 and January 2014. The bibliographies of the included studies were examined with the same criteria. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group framework was used to evaluate the included studies, and RevMan 5.1 and GRADEprofiler 3.6 were used to analyze the extracted data. A total of 19 studies with 6,180 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the pCR rates in patients with TNBC were significantly higher than those in patients with non-TNBC. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly lower in the patients with TNBC compared with those with non-TNBC. Furthermore, these survival rates were significantly higher in the patients with TNBC who achieved a pCR compared with those in the patients who did not achieve a pCR. pCR rates were higher among the patients with TNBC with high Ki-67 expression than among those with low Ki-67 expression. The patients with TNBC exhibited lower survival rates compared with those with non-TNBC, but achieved higher pCR rates. Moreover, those patients achieving a pCR exhibited improved 5-year survival rates, suggesting that the pCR rate could be predictive of survival in patients with TNBC. In addition, high Ki-67 expression may predict the likelihood of a pCR. However, future multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to enhance the quantity and quality of the clinical evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  molecular marker; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathological complete response; survival; triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2015        PMID: 26137155      PMCID: PMC4473711          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  30 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiangnan Kong; Meena S Moran; Ning Zhang; Bruce Haffty; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival compared with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer only after complete pathologic response.

Authors:  Carla S Fisher; Cynthia X Ma; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft; Timothy J Eberlein; Feng Gao; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Makiko Ono; Hitoshi Tsuda; Chikako Shimizu; Sohei Yamamoto; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Harukaze Yamamoto; Taizo Hirata; Kan Yonemori; Masashi Ando; Kenji Tamura; Noriyuki Katsumata; Takayuki Kinoshita; Yuichi Takiguchi; Hideki Tanzawa; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

Authors:  Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Roy E Smith; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Ann M Brown; Andre Robidoux; Richard Margolese; Morton S Kahlenberg; Soonmyung Paik; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Identification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Chad A Livasy; Charles M Perou; Gamze Karaca; David W Cowan; Diane Maia; Susan Jackson; Chiu-Kit Tse; Sarah Nyante; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  B Sirohi; M Arnedos; S Popat; S Ashley; A Nerurkar; G Walsh; S Johnston; I E Smith
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Preoperative weekly cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel with G-CSF support in triple-negative large operable breast cancer.

Authors:  G Frasci; P Comella; M Rinaldo; G Iodice; M Di Bonito; M D'Aiuto; A Petrillo; S Lastoria; C Siani; G Comella; G D'Aiuto
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Impact of immunohistochemistry-based molecular subtype on chemosensitivity and survival in patients with breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Changhoon Yoo; Jin-Hee Ahn; Kyung Hae Jung; Sung-Bae Kim; Hak-Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Sei Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son; Gyungyub Gong
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Identification of biology-based breast cancer types with distinct predictive and prognostic features: role of steroid hormone and HER2 receptor expression in patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Sibylle Loibl; Berit M Müller; Marc Roller; Carsten Denkert; Martina Komor; Karsten Schlüns; Jens Uwe Blohmer; Jan Budczies; Bernd Gerber; Aurelia Noske; Andreas du Bois; Wilko Weichert; Christian Jackisch; Manfred Dietel; Klaus Richter; Manfred Kaufmann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Jianyun Yin; Changtai Zhu; Gaofeng Wang; Jianwei Gu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Eribulin upregulates miR-195 expression and downregulates Wnt3a expression in non-basal-like type of triple-negative breast cancer cell MDA-MB-231.

Authors:  Kanji Furuya; Akiko Sasaki; Yuko Tsunoda; Mayumi Tsuji; Yuko Udaka; Hideto Oyamada; Hiromichi Tsuchiya; Katsuji Oguchi
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Prognostic and clinicopathological value of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase expression in breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiqiang Qiao; Linlin Pan; Changgui Kou; Ke Li; Ming Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy reduces locoregional and disease recurrence in patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy.

Authors:  Xingxing Chen; Fan Xia; Jurui Luo; Jinli Ma; Zhaozhi Yang; Li Zhang; Yan Feng; Zhimin Shao; Xiaoli Yu; Xiaomao Guo
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Effect of antitumor treatments on triple-negative breast cancer patients: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Qiuhong Tian; Peng Du; Sen Li; Zhenzhu Bai; Yong Yang; Jinsheng Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Prognostic Value of Ki-67 in Patients With Resected Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qiang Wu; Guangzhi Ma; Yunfu Deng; Wuxia Luo; Yaqin Zhao; Wen Li; Qinghua Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.