Literature DB >> 26136459

Changes in Aortic Wall Structure, Composition, and Stiffness With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Pilot Study.

Amrut V Ambardekar1, Kendall S Hunter2, Ashok N Babu2, Rubin M Tuder2, R Blair Dodson2, JoAnn Lindenfeld2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of nonpulsatile flow on the aorta are unknown. Our aim was to examine the structure of the aorta from patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and directly measure aortic wall composition and stiffness. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Age-matched aortic wall samples were collected from consecutive patients with heart failure (HF) at the time of transplantation and compared with nonfailing donor hearts. An unbiased stereological approach was used to quantify aortic morphometry and composition, and biomechanical testing was performed to determine the stress-strain relationship of the vessel. Data were obtained from 4 patients without a left ventricular assist device (HF group: mean age, 58.3±8.0 years), 7 patients with a continuous-flow LVAD (HF+LVAD group: mean, 57.7±5.6 years), and 3 nonfailing donors (mean, 53.3±12.9 years). Compared with HF, the aortic walls from HF+LVAD had an increase in wall thickness, collagen, and smooth muscle content accompanied by a reduction in elastin and mucinous ground-substance content. Stress-strain curves from the aortas revealed increased vessel stiffness in HF+LVAD compared with HF and nonfailing. The physiological modulus of the aorta progressively stiffened from 74.3±5.5 kPa in the nonfailing to 134.4±35.0 kPa in the HF to 201.7±36.4kPa in the HF+LVAD groups (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Among continuous-flow LVAD patients without aortic valve opening, there are changes in the structure and composition of the aorta as well as an increase in aortic wall stiffness compared with age-matched HF patients and nonfailing donors. Further studies examining the role of nonpulsatile blood flow on aortic function and the potential resultant systemic sequelae are needed.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aorta; collagen; elastin; heart failure; heart-assist devices; muscle, smooth; vascular stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26136459     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  17 in total

1.  Shear stress and blood trauma under constant and pulse-modulated speed CF-VAD operations: CFD analysis of the HVAD.

Authors:  Zengsheng Chen; Sofen K Jena; Guruprasad A Giridharan; Michael A Sobieski; Steven C Koenig; Mark S Slaughter; Bartley P Griffith; Zhongjun J Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  CrossTalk proposal: Blood flow pulsatility in left ventricular assist device patients is essential to maintain normal brain physiology.

Authors:  Eric J Stöhr; Barry J McDonnell; Paolo C Colombo; Joshua Z Willey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Chugging to silent machines: development of mechanical cardiac support.

Authors:  Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 4.  Patient-centered care for left ventricular assist device therapy: current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Khadijah Breathett; Larry A Allen; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Coronary Artery Remodeling and Fibrosis With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Authors:  Amrut V Ambardekar; Mary C M Weiser-Evans; Marcella Li; Suneet N Purohit; Muhammad Aftab; T Brett Reece; Karen S Moulton
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Living Without a Pulse: The Vascular Implications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Suneet N Purohit; William K Cornwell; Jay D Pal; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.790

7.  Structural and functional cardiac profile after prolonged duration of mechanical unloading: potential implications for myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Estibaliz Castillero; Ziad A Ali; Hirokazu Akashi; Nicholas Giangreco; Catherine Wang; Eric J Stöhr; Ruping Ji; Xiaokan Zhang; Nathaniel Kheysin; Joo-Eun S Park; Sheetal Hegde; Sanatkumar Patel; Samantha Stein; Carlos Cuenca; Diana Leung; Shunichi Homma; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Veli K Topkara; Koji Takeda; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; H Lee Sweeney; P Christian Schulze; Isaac George
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Impact and Measurement of Blood Pressure During Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: The Pressure Is On!

Authors:  Omar Saeed; Ulrich P Jorde
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 9.  Physiologic effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Aaron H Healy; Stephen H McKellar; Stavros G Drakos; Antigoni Koliopoulou; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  The mid-term effect of left ventricular assist devices on renal functions.

Authors:  Mustafa Emre Gürcü; Özge Altaş Yerlikhan; Tanıl Özer; Atakan Erkılınç; Ece Altınay; Esin Erdem; Murat Gücün; Nural Bekiroğlu; Kaan Kırali
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 0.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.