Vashti Irani1, Paul A Ramsland2, Andrew J Guy3, Peter M Siba4, Ivo Mueller5, Jack S Richards6, James G Beeson6. 1. Centre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville Department of Immunology, Monash University, Melbourne. 2. Centre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne Department of Immunology, Monash University, Melbourne Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute-Biosciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 3. Centre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne Department of Immunology, Monash University, Melbourne. 4. Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka. 5. Infection and Immunity Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Barcelona Centre for International Health Research, Spain. 6. Centre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The targets and mechanisms of human immunity to malaria are poorly understood, which poses a major barrier to malaria vaccine development. Antibodies play a key role in human immunity and may act by inhibiting receptor-binding functions of key merozoite invasion ligands. Antibodies to the major invasion ligand and vaccine candidate, erythrocyte-binding antigen 175 (EBA-175), have been linked with protection, but how these antibodies function has not been established. METHODS: We developed 2 new assays that quantify the ability of antibodies to inhibit binding of EBA-175 to its erythrocyte receptor, glycophorin A, using either native or recombinant EBA-175. Binding-inhibitory antibodies were evaluated in a longitudinal cohort study of Papua New Guinean children and related to risk of malaria, age, infection status, and markers of parasite exposure. RESULTS: Binding-inhibition assays (BIAs) were reproducible, and the 2 assays had a high level of agreement. Inhibitory antibodies were common among children, acquired in association with markers of increasing parasite exposure, and high in those children with active infection. Inhibitory antibodies correlated with total immunoglobulin G levels to the EBA-175 binding domain (region II). Importantly, binding-inhibitory antibodies were significantly associated with protection from symptomatic malaria when measured using either BIA. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that naturally acquired binding-inhibitory antibodies are an important functional mechanism that contributes to protection against malaria and further supports the potential of EBA-175 as a vaccine candidate. Identifying vaccines and approaches that induce potent binding-inhibitory antibodies may be a valuable strategy in the development of highly efficacious malaria vaccines.
BACKGROUND: The targets and mechanisms of human immunity to malaria are poorly understood, which poses a major barrier to malaria vaccine development. Antibodies play a key role in human immunity and may act by inhibiting receptor-binding functions of key merozoite invasion ligands. Antibodies to the major invasion ligand and vaccine candidate, erythrocyte-binding antigen 175 (EBA-175), have been linked with protection, but how these antibodies function has not been established. METHODS: We developed 2 new assays that quantify the ability of antibodies to inhibit binding of EBA-175 to its erythrocyte receptor, glycophorin A, using either native or recombinant EBA-175. Binding-inhibitory antibodies were evaluated in a longitudinal cohort study of Papua New Guinean children and related to risk of malaria, age, infection status, and markers of parasite exposure. RESULTS: Binding-inhibition assays (BIAs) were reproducible, and the 2 assays had a high level of agreement. Inhibitory antibodies were common among children, acquired in association with markers of increasing parasite exposure, and high in those children with active infection. Inhibitory antibodies correlated with total immunoglobulin G levels to the EBA-175 binding domain (region II). Importantly, binding-inhibitory antibodies were significantly associated with protection from symptomatic malaria when measured using either BIA. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that naturally acquired binding-inhibitory antibodies are an important functional mechanism that contributes to protection against malaria and further supports the potential of EBA-175 as a vaccine candidate. Identifying vaccines and approaches that induce potent binding-inhibitory antibodies may be a valuable strategy in the development of highly efficacious malaria vaccines.
Authors: Bartholomew N Ondigo; James S Hodges; Kathleen F Ireland; Ng'wena G Magak; David E Lanar; Sheetij Dutta; David L Narum; Gregory S Park; Ayub V Ofulla; Chandy C John Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Michelle J Boyle; Linda Reiling; Gaoqian Feng; Christine Langer; Faith H Osier; Harvey Aspeling-Jones; Yik Sheng Cheng; Janine Stubbs; Kevin K A Tetteh; David J Conway; James S McCarthy; Ivo Muller; Kevin Marsh; Robin F Anders; James G Beeson Journal: Immunity Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Faith Ha Osier; Gaoqian Feng; Michelle J Boyle; Christine Langer; Jingling Zhou; Jack S Richards; Fiona J McCallum; Linda Reiling; Anthony Jaworowski; Robin F Anders; Kevin Marsh; James G Beeson Journal: BMC Med Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Kwadwo A Koram; Bright Adu; Josephine Ocran; Yaa S Karikari; Susan Adu-Amankwah; Michael Ntiri; Benjamin Abuaku; Daniel Dodoo; Ben Gyan; Karl C Kronmann; Francis Nkrumah Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hamza B Abagna; Festus K Acquah; Ruth Okonu; Nii A Aryee; Michael Theisen; Linda E Amoah Journal: Malar J Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Muyideen K Tijani; Oluwatoyin A Babalola; Alex B Odaibo; Chiaka I Anumudu; Adanze O Asinobi; Olajumoke A Morenikeji; Michael C Asuzu; Christine Langer; Linda Reiling; James G Beeson; Mats Wahlgren; Roseangela I Nwuba; Kristina E M Persson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrew J Guy; Vashti Irani; James G Beeson; Benjamin Webb; Andrej Sali; Jack S Richards; Paul A Ramsland Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Alistair R D McLean; D Herbert Opi; Danielle I Stanisic; Julia C Cutts; Gaoqian Feng; Alice Ura; Ivo Mueller; Stephen J Rogerson; James G Beeson; Freya J I Fowkes Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: James G Beeson; Damien R Drew; Michelle J Boyle; Gaoqian Feng; Freya J I Fowkes; Jack S Richards Journal: FEMS Microbiol Rev Date: 2016-01-31 Impact factor: 16.408
Authors: Selasi Dankwa; Mudit Chaand; Usheer Kanjee; Rays H Y Jiang; Luis V Nobre; Jonathan M Goldberg; Amy K Bei; Mischka A Moechtar; Christof Grüring; Ambroise D Ahouidi; Daouda Ndiaye; Tandakha N Dieye; Souleymane Mboup; Michael P Weekes; Manoj T Duraisingh Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 3.441