Literature DB >> 26135112

Determination of Skeletal Tumor Burden on 18F-Fluoride PET/CT.

Eric M Rohren1, Elba C Etchebehere2, John C Araujo3, Brian P Hobbs4, Nancy M Swanston1, Michael Everding1, Tracy Moody1, Homer A Macapinlac1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to define a method to assess skeletal tumor burden with 18F-labeled sodium fluoride PET/CT (18F-fluoride PET/CT) and evaluate the reproducibility of these measurements.
METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive patients (90 men; mean age±SD, 65.7±14.2 y) underwent 158 18F-fluoride PET/CT scans for evaluation of skeletal metastatic disease. In order to determine the mean normal bone SUV, initially a 1-cm spheric volume of interest (VOI) was placed over 5 bone sites: T12, L5, sacrum, right iliac bone, and right femur. For each patient, the mean SUVmax for all sites was generated. Afterward, a threshold value of normal bone uptake was established. Subsequently, skeletal tumor burden was determined by generating volumetric data using a whole-body segmentation method. Any SUVmax below the normal threshold was excluded from analysis, as were VOIs not related to metastatic disease. Statistics for the remaining VOIs were then generated and defined as the skeletal metastatic tumor burden by 2 parameters: total lesion fluoride uptake above an SUVmax of 10 (TLF10) and fluoride tumor volume above an SUVmax of 10 (FTV10). TLF10 and FTV10 reproducibility was determined using 2 independent and experienced PET/CT interpreters analyzing a subset of 13 18F-fluoride PET/CT scans.
RESULTS: Mean (±SD) normal bone SUVmax was 6.62±1.55 for T12, 6.11±1.73 for L5, 4.59±1.74 for sacrum, 5.39±1.72 for right iliac bone, and 3.90±1.57 for right femur. The mean normal SUVmax for all 543 sites was 5.32±0.99. On the basis of these values, an SUVmax threshold of 10 was chosen to exclude normal bone from the volumetric calculations. Semiautomated measurements of TLF10 and FTV10 exhibited high interobserver reproducibility, within ±0.77% and ±3.62% of the interinterpreter average for TLF10 and FTV10, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Determination of skeletal tumor burden with 18F-fluoride PET/CT is feasible and highly reproducible. Using an SUVmax threshold of 10 excludes nearly all normal bone activity from volumetric calculations.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NaF PET/CT; bone metastases; fluoride PET/CT; prostate cancer; skeletal tumor burden

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26135112      PMCID: PMC5025941          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  34 in total

1.  The kinetics and reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride for oncology using current PET camera technology.

Authors:  Karen A Kurdziel; Joanna H Shih; Andrea B Apolo; Liza Lindenberg; Esther Mena; Yolanda Y McKinney; Stephen S Adler; Baris Turkbey; William Dahut; James L Gulley; Ravi A Madan; Ola Landgren; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan.

Authors:  M S Soloway; S W Hardeman; D Hickey; J Raymond; B Todd; S Soloway; M Moinuddin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate.

Authors:  G M Blake; S J Park-Holohan; G J Cook; I Fogelman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Malik E Juweid; Gregory A Wiseman; Julie M Vose; Justine M Ritchie; Yusuf Menda; James E Wooldridge; Felix M Mottaghy; Eric M Rohren; Norbert M Blumstein; Alan Stolpen; Brian K Link; Sven N Reske; Michael M Graham; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Fluoride kinetics of the axial skeleton measured in vivo with fluorine-18-fluoride PET.

Authors:  C Schiepers; J Nuyts; G Bormans; J Dequeker; R Bouillon; L Mortelmans; A Verbruggen; M De Roo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT in oncology: an atlas of SUVs.

Authors:  Nathanael Sabbah; Tatianie Jackson; Camila Mosci; Mehran Jamali; Ryogo Minamimoto; Andrew Quon; Erik S Mittra; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.794

8.  Impact of 18F-fluoride PET in patients with known prostate cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry.

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner; Barry A Siegel; Lucy Hanna; Fenghai Duan; Anthony F Shields; R Edward Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Selin Carkaci; Christopher T Sherman; Efe Ozkan; Beatriz E Adrada; Wei Wei; Eric M Rohren; Osama R Mawlawi; Naoto T Ueno; Thomas A Buchholz; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Metabolic burden measured by (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography is a prognostic factor in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mi-Hyun Kim; Ji Seok Lee; Jeong Ha Mok; Kwangha Lee; Ki Uk Kim; Hye-Kyung Park; Seong-Jang Kim; Min Ki Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.679

View more
  25 in total

1.  Quantifying skeletal burden in fibrous dysplasia using sodium fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Wouter van der Bruggen; Marlous Hagelstein-Rotman; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Frits Smit; P D Sander Dijkstra; Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra; Dennis Vriens
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Therapy assessment of bone metastatic disease in the era of 223radium.

Authors:  Elba Etchebehere; Ana Emilia Brito; Alireza Rezaee; Werner Langsteger; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  18F-NaF/223RaCl2 theranostics in metastatic prostate cancer: treatment response assessment and prediction of outcome.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Prostate-specific antigen flare induced by 223RaCl2 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Angelo Castello; H A Macapinlac; E Lopci; E B Santos
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Quantitative Assessment of Early [18F]Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Response to Treatment in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer to Bone.

Authors:  Stephanie A Harmon; Timothy Perk; Christie Lin; Jens Eickhoff; Peter L Choyke; William L Dahut; Andrea B Apolo; John L Humm; Steven M Larson; Michael J Morris; Glenn Liu; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Molecular image-directed biopsies: improving clinical biopsy selection in patients with multiple tumors.

Authors:  Stephanie A Harmon; Michael J Tuite; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Bone-Targeted Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrei H Iagaru; Erik Mittra; Patrick M Colletti; Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-NaF PET: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Christie Lin; Tyler Bradshaw; Timothy Perk; Stephanie Harmon; Jens Eickhoff; Ngoneh Jallow; Peter L Choyke; William L Dahut; Steven Larson; John Laurence Humm; Scott Perlman; Andrea B Apolo; Michael J Morris; Glenn Liu; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Uptake of Radium-223 Dichloride and Early [18F]NaF PET Response Are Driven by Baseline [18F]NaF Parameters: a Pilot Study in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Arthur Letellier; Alison C Johnson; Nicolas How Kit; Jean-François Savigny; Alain Batalla; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Combined bone scintigraphy and fluorocholine PET/computed tomography predicts response to radium-223 therapy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michele Klain; Valeria Gaudieri; Mario Petretta; Emilia Zampella; Giovanni Storto; Carmela Nappi; Carlo Buonerba; Felice Crocetto; Rosj Gallicchio; Fabio Volpe; Leonardo Pace; Martin Schlumberger; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.