| Literature DB >> 26134653 |
F Clifford Rodgers1, Ewa D Zarnowska2, Kurt T Laha2, Elif Engin3, Anja Zeller4, Ruth Keist4, Uwe Rudolph3, Robert A Pearce5.
Abstract
Previous experiments using genetic and pharmacological manipulations have provided strong evidence that etomidate impairs synaptic plasticity and memory by modulating α5-subunit containing GABAA receptors (α5-GABAARs). Because α5-GABAARs mediate tonic inhibition (TI) in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells and etomidate enhances TI, etomidate enhancement of TI in pyramidal cells has been proposed as the underlying mechanism (Martin et al., 2009). Here we tested this hypothesis by selectively removing α5-GABAARs from pyramidal neurons (CA1-pyr-α5-KO) and comparing the ability of etomidate to enhance TI and block LTP in fl-α5 (WT), global-α5-KO (gl-α5-KO), and CA1-pyr-α5-KO mice. Etomidate suppressed LTP in slices from WT and CA1-pyr-α5-KO but not gl-α5-KO mice. There was a trend toward reduced TI in both gl-α5-KO and CA1-pyr-α5-KO mice, but etomidate enhanced TI to similar levels in all genotypes. The dissociation between effects of etomidate on TI and LTP in gl-α5-KO mice indicates that increased TI in pyramidal neurons is not the mechanism by which etomidate impairs LTP and memory. Rather, the ability of etomidate to block LTP in WT and CA1-pyr-α5-KO mice, but not in gl-α5-KO mice, points toward α5-GABAARs on nonpyramidal cells as the essential effectors controlling plasticity in this in vitro model of learning and memory.Entities:
Keywords: GABAA receptor; LTP; learning and memory; mechanisms of anesthesia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26134653 PMCID: PMC4571505 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0315-15.2015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurosci ISSN: 0270-6474 Impact factor: 6.167