Literature DB >> 26134223

An Integrated Prognostic Classifier for Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on mRNA, microRNA, and DNA Methylation Biomarkers.

Ana I Robles1, Eri Arai, Ewy A Mathé, Hirokazu Okayama, Aaron J Schetter, Derek Brown, David Petersen, Elise D Bowman, Rintaro Noro, Judith A Welsh, Daniel C Edelman, Holly S Stevenson, Yonghong Wang, Naoto Tsuchiya, Takashi Kohno, Vidar Skaug, Steen Mollerup, Aage Haugen, Paul S Meltzer, Jun Yokota, Yae Kanai, Curtis C Harris.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Up to 30% stage I lung cancer patients suffer recurrence within 5 years of curative surgery. We sought to improve existing protein-coding gene and microRNA expression prognostic classifiers by incorporating epigenetic biomarkers.
METHODS: Genome-wide screening of DNA methylation and pyrosequencing analysis of HOXA9 promoter methylation were performed in two independently collected cohorts of stage I lung adenocarcinoma. The prognostic value of HOXA9 promoter methylation alone and in combination with mRNA and miRNA biomarkers was assessed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in both cohorts.
RESULTS: Promoters of genes marked by polycomb in embryonic stem cells were methylated de novo in tumors and identified patients with poor prognosis. The HOXA9 locus was methylated de novo in stage I tumors (p < 0.0005). High HOXA9 promoter methylation was associated with worse cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; p = 0.02) and recurrence-free survival (HR, 3.0; p = 0.01), and identified high-risk patients in stratified analysis of stages IA and IB. Four protein-coding gene (XPO1, BRCA1, HIF1α, and DLC1), miR-21 expression, and HOXA9 promoter methylation were each independently associated with outcome (HR, 2.8; p = 0.002; HR, 2.3; p = 0.01; and HR, 2.4; p = 0.005, respectively), and when combined, identified high-risk, therapy naive, stage I patients (HR, 10.2; p = 3 × 10). All associations were confirmed in two independently collected cohorts.
CONCLUSION: A prognostic classifier comprising three types of genomic and epigenomic data may help guide the postoperative management of stage I lung cancer patients at high risk of recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26134223      PMCID: PMC4493931          DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  45 in total

1.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository.

Authors:  Ron Edgar; Michael Domrachev; Alex E Lash
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The expression of four genes as a prognostic classifier for stage I lung adenocarcinoma in 12 independent cohorts.

Authors:  Hirokazu Okayama; Aaron J Schetter; Teruhide Ishigame; Ana I Robles; Takashi Kohno; Jun Yokota; Seiichi Takenoshita; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Graphical methods for assessing violations of the proportional hazards assumption in Cox regression.

Authors:  K R Hess
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A combined prognostic serum interleukin-8 and interleukin-6 classifier for stage 1 lung cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Bríd M Ryan; Sharon R Pine; Anil K Chaturvedi; Neil Caporaso; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Noninvasive urinary metabolomic profiling identifies diagnostic and prognostic markers in lung cancer.

Authors:  Ewy A Mathé; Andrew D Patterson; Majda Haznadar; Soumen K Manna; Kristopher W Krausz; Elise D Bowman; Peter G Shields; Jeffrey R Idle; Philip B Smith; Katsuhiro Anami; Dickran G Kazandjian; Emmanuel Hatzakis; Frank J Gonzalez; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Epigenetic clustering of lung adenocarcinomas based on DNA methylation profiles in adjacent lung tissue: Its correlation with smoking history and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Takashi Sato; Eri Arai; Takashi Kohno; Yoriko Takahashi; Sayaka Miyata; Koji Tsuta; Shun-ichi Watanabe; Kenzo Soejima; Tomoko Betsuyaku; Yae Kanai
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  A prognostic DNA methylation signature for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Juan Sandoval; Jesus Mendez-Gonzalez; Ernest Nadal; Guoan Chen; F Javier Carmona; Sergi Sayols; Sebastian Moran; Holger Heyn; Miguel Vizoso; Antonio Gomez; Montse Sanchez-Cespedes; Yassen Assenov; Fabian Müller; Christoph Bock; Miquel Taron; Josefina Mora; Lucia A Muscarella; Triantafillos Liloglou; Michael Davies; Marina Pollan; Maria J Pajares; Wenceslao Torre; Luis M Montuenga; Elisabeth Brambilla; John K Field; Luca Roz; Marco Lo Iacono; Giorgio V Scagliotti; Rafael Rosell; David G Beer; Manel Esteller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  52 in total

1.  Methods to increase reproducibility in differential gene expression via meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy E Sweeney; Winston A Haynes; Francesco Vallania; John P Ioannidis; Purvesh Khatri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Longitudinal analysis of epigenome-wide DNA methylation reveals novel smoking-related loci in African Americans.

Authors:  Jiaxuan Liu; Wei Zhao; Farah Ammous; Stephen T Turner; Thomas H Mosley; Xiang Zhou; Jennifer A Smith
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 3.  Methylation analyses in liquid biopsy.

Authors:  Delphine Lissa; Ana I Robles
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10

4.  Integration of multiple "OMIC" biomarkers: A precision medicine strategy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Ana I Robles; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 5.  Prognostic and predictive biomarkers post curative intent therapy.

Authors:  Rebecca Feldman; Edward S Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

Review 6.  Biomarker development in the precision medicine era: lung cancer as a case study.

Authors:  Ashley J Vargas; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Genome-wide association studies and epigenome-wide association studies go together in cancer control.

Authors:  Mukesh Verma
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Transcriptome Based Estrogen Related Genes Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Sinong Jia; Lei Li; Li Xie; Weituo Zhang; Tengteng Zhu; Biyun Qian
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  In silico analysis identifies neuropilin-1 as a potential therapeutic target for SARS-Cov-2 infected lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Song Hu; Zheyu Hu; Jiajia Qin; Chuwen Lin; Xuan Jiang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 10.  MicroRNA In Lung Cancer: Novel Biomarkers and Potential Tools for Treatment.

Authors:  Kentaro Inamura; Yuichi Ishikawa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.