Hui Cui1, Xiuying Wang2, Weiran Lin2, Jianlong Zhou3, Stefan Eberl4, Dagan Feng2,5, Michael Fulham4,6. 1. Biomedical and Multimedia Information Technology (BMIT) Research Group, School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. hcui7511@uni.sydney.edu.au. 2. Biomedical and Multimedia Information Technology (BMIT) Research Group, School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 3. National ICT, Sydney, Australia. 4. Department of PET and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 5. Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. 6. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Accurate lung tumor segmentation is a prerequisite for effective radiation therapy and surgical planning. However, tumor delineation is challenging when the tumor boundaries are indistinct on PET or CT. To address this problem, we developed a segmentation method to improve the delineation of primary lung tumors from PET-CT images. METHODS: We formulated the segmentation problem as a label information propagation process in an iterative manner. Our model incorporates spatial-topological information from PET and local intensity changes from CT. The topological information of the regions was extracted based on the metabolic activity of different tissues. The spatial-topological information moderates the amount of label information that a pixel receives: The label information attenuates as the spatial distance increases and when crossing different topological regions. Thus, the spatial-topological constraint assists accurate tumor delineation and separation. The label information propagation and transition model are solved under a random walk framework. RESULTS: Our method achieved an average DSC of 0.848 ± 0.036 and HD (mm) of 8.652 ± 4.532 on 40 patients with lung cancer. The t test showed a significant improvement (p value < 0.05) in segmentation accuracy when compared to eight other methods. Our method was better able to delineate tumors that had heterogeneous FDG uptake and which abutted adjacent structures that had similar densities. CONCLUSIONS: Our method, using a spatial-topological constraint, provided better lung tumor delineation, in particular, when the tumor involved or abutted the chest wall and the mediastinum.
PURPOSE: Accurate lung tumor segmentation is a prerequisite for effective radiation therapy and surgical planning. However, tumor delineation is challenging when the tumor boundaries are indistinct on PET or CT. To address this problem, we developed a segmentation method to improve the delineation of primary lung tumors from PET-CT images. METHODS: We formulated the segmentation problem as a label information propagation process in an iterative manner. Our model incorporates spatial-topological information from PET and local intensity changes from CT. The topological information of the regions was extracted based on the metabolic activity of different tissues. The spatial-topological information moderates the amount of label information that a pixel receives: The label information attenuates as the spatial distance increases and when crossing different topological regions. Thus, the spatial-topological constraint assists accurate tumor delineation and separation. The label information propagation and transition model are solved under a random walk framework. RESULTS: Our method achieved an average DSC of 0.848 ± 0.036 and HD (mm) of 8.652 ± 4.532 on 40 patients with lung cancer. The t test showed a significant improvement (p value < 0.05) in segmentation accuracy when compared to eight other methods. Our method was better able to delineate tumors that had heterogeneous FDG uptake and which abutted adjacent structures that had similar densities. CONCLUSIONS: Our method, using a spatial-topological constraint, provided better lung tumor delineation, in particular, when the tumor involved or abutted the chest wall and the mediastinum.
Authors: Quinten C Black; Inga S Grills; Larry L Kestin; Ching-Yee O Wong; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez; Di Yan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Michelle Wanner-Roybal; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Geoffrey McLennan Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Qi Song; Junjie Bai; Dongfeng Han; Sudershan Bhatia; Wenqing Sun; William Rockey; John E Bayouth; John M Buatti; Xiaodong Wu Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 10.048