Literature DB >> 26133258

Phenotype profiling of Modic changes of the lumbar spine and its association with other MRI phenotypes: a large-scale population-based study.

Juhani H Määttä1, Jaro I Karppinen2, Keith D K Luk3, Kenneth M C Cheung4, Dino Samartzis5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Modic changes (MC) are associated with low back pain. They represent vertebral endplate and adjacent vertebral marrow changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), classified into three types. Because of small sample sizes, patient cohorts, and limited phenotype assessment, the morphology and involvement of MC and their association with other spinal phenotypes remain speculative.
PURPOSE: We addressed and proposed a phenotypic profiling of MC and their relationship with lumbar MRI phenotypes in a large-scale population-based study. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A cross-sectional study of the Hong Kong Disc Degeneration Cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study population consisted of 1,546 Southern Chinese volunteers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Topographical and morphological dimensions of MC, presence of disc degeneration (DD) and displacement, and Schmorl nodes were evaluated.
METHODS: Axial T1-weighted and sagittal T2-weighted MRIs (3T) were assessed.
RESULTS: Females were 62.4% (mean age, 49 years). The overall prevalence of MC was 21.9% (6.3% Type I and 15.5% Type II). Of all MC, 76% were located at the two lowest lumbar levels. Modic changes at the two lowest lumbar levels were more commonly located laterally (p<.001), less commonly anteriorly (p<.001), and were more extensive horizontally (p=.006) but not in vertical height compared with the upper levels. Type I MC were less common in the anterior part (p=.022), larger in size (height p=.004), and affected more likely the whole horizontal plane (p=.016) than Type II MC. Modic changes were associated with disc displacement, Schmorl nodes, and DD at the affected level (all p<.001), and the strength of association increased with the size of the lesion. Type I MC were associated more strongly with disc displacement (p=.008) and DD (p=.022) than Type II MC.
CONCLUSIONS: Our large-scale MRI study is the first to definitely note that MC were size- and type-dependently significantly associated with disc pathology and endplate abnormalities. Our phenotype profiling of MC may have clinical utility.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degeneration; Disc; Displacement; Endplate; Epidemiology; Magnetic resonance imaging; Modic changes; Phenotype; Schmorl nodes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26133258     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  32 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Change in fatty infiltration of lumbar multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas muscles in asymptomatic adults of Asian or Caucasian ethnicities.

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; James M Elliott; Thomas Volken
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbar spinal degenerative "microinstability": hype or hope? Proposal of a new classification to detect it and to assess surgical treatment.

Authors:  A Landi; F Gregori; C Mancarella; V Maiola; E Maccari; N Marotta; R Delfini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Chronic low back pain in relation to Modic changes, bony endplate lesions, and disc degeneration in a prospective MRI study.

Authors:  Katariina Luoma; Tapio Vehmas; Liisa Kerttula; Mats Grönblad; Eeva Rinne
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Association between types of Modic changes in the lumbar region and low back pain in a large cohort: the Wakayama spine study.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Mera; Masatoshi Teraguchi; Hiroshi Hashizume; Hiroyuki Oka; Shigeyuki Muraki; Toru Akune; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura; Hidenobu Tamai; Sakae Tanaka; Munehito Yoshida; Noriko Yoshimura; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies Crucial to Our Understanding of Spinal Conditions?

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Maryse Fortin; Kenneth A Weber; Andrew Smith; James M Elliott
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Differential patient responses to spinal manipulative therapy and their relation to spinal degeneration and post-treatment changes in disc diffusion.

Authors:  Arnold Y L Wong; Eric C Parent; Sukhvinder S Dhillon; Narasimha Prasad; Dino Samartzis; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Structural vertebral endplate nomenclature and etiology: a study by the ISSLS Spinal Phenotype Focus Group.

Authors:  Uruj Zehra; Cora Bow; Jeffrey C Lotz; Frances M K Williams; S Rajasekaran; Jaro Karppinen; Keith D K Luk; Michele C Battiê; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The association of lumbar intervertebral disc calcification on plain radiographs with the UTE Disc Sign on MRI.

Authors:  Uruj Zehra; Cora Bow; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Henry Pang; William Lu; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The Association of MRI Findings and Long-Term Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Peter Muhareb Udby; Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Tom Bendix; Stig Brorson; Leah Y Carreon; Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.