Literature DB >> 14761062

A test of alternative hypotheses for the evolution of reproductive isolation between spadefoot toads: support for the reinforcement hypothesis.

Karin S Pfennig1.   

Abstract

How do species that interbreed become reproductively isolated? If hybrids are less fit than parental types, natural selection should promote reproductive isolation by favoring the evolution of premating mechanisms that prevent hybridization (a process termed reinforcement). Although reinforcement should generate a decline in hybridization over time, countervailing forces of gene flow and recombination are thought to preclude natural selection from enhancing and finalizing reproductive isolation. Here, I present recent estimates of hybridization frequency between two species of spadefoot toad, Spea multiplicata and S. bombifrons. I compare these recent measures of hybrid frequency with previously published estimates and show that hybridization between these species has declined precipitously over the past 27 years. Although previous studies suggest that reinforcement possibly accounts for this decline in hybrids over time, three alternative hypotheses also can explain the observed decrease in hybridization. First, if one of the two interacting species becomes rare, opportunities for and incidence of hybridization may decrease. Second, if one of the two interacting species is initially rare, hybridization may be initially common if the rare species has difficulty locating conspecific mates. Third, if hybrids are produced only in particular environments, hybrid frequency may decline if habitat changes result in loss of those environments that promote hybrid formation. I found no support for these three alternative explanations of the decline in hybrids. Instead, reinforcement appears to best account for the evolution of enhanced reproductive isolation between these species. Moreover, the finding that hybridization declined precipitously in only 27 years suggests that many systems that have undergone reinforcement may be overlooked because reproductive isolation between the interacting populations or species may already be complete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14761062     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01525.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  19 in total

1.  Fission and fusion of Darwin's finches populations.

Authors:  B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genetic variation during range expansion: effects of habitat novelty and hybridization.

Authors:  Amanda A Pierce; Rafael Gutierrez; Amber M Rice; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Reinforcement generates reproductive isolation between neighbouring conspecific populations of spadefoot toads.

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig; Amber M Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion.

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig; Audrey L Kelly; Amanda A Pierce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Heterospecific pairing and hybridization between Nasutitermes corniger and N. ephratae.

Authors:  Tamara R Hartke; Rebeca B Rosengaus
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-07-15

Review 6.  Development and evolution of character displacement.

Authors:  David W Pfennig; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Variation in hybrid gene expression: Implications for the evolution of genetic incompatibilities in interbreeding species.

Authors:  Fabian Seidl; Nicholas A Levis; Corbin D Jones; Anaïs Monroy-Eklund; Ian M Ehrenreich; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Correlated evolution of male and female reproductive traits drive a cascading effect of reinforcement in Drosophila yakuba.

Authors:  Aaron A Comeault; Aarti Venkat; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A suite of molecular markers for identifying species, detecting introgression and describing population structure in spadefoot toads (Spea spp.).

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig; Ashley Allenby; Ryan A Martin; Anaïs Monroy; Corbin D Jones
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Seeking signatures of reinforcement at the genetic level: a hitchhiking mapping and candidate gene approach in the house mouse.

Authors:  Carole M Smadja; Etienne Loire; Pierre Caminade; Marios Thoma; Yasmin Latour; Camille Roux; Michaela Thoss; Dustin J Penn; Guila Ganem; Pierre Boursot
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.