Patricia Mildred Flach1, Sarah Schroth, Wolf Schweitzer, Garyfalia Ampanozi, Johannes Slotboom, Claus Kiefer, Tanja Germerott, Michael J Thali, Marwan El-Koussy. 1. From the *Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich; and †Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich; and ‡Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern; and Departments of §Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology and ∥Neurology, University Hospital of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland; and ¶Institute of Legal Medicine, Medical School Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In traumatic brain injury, diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging of the brain are essential techniques for determining the pathology sustained and the outcome. Postmortem cross-sectional imaging is an established adjunct to forensic autopsy in death investigation. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate postmortem diffusion tensor imaging in forensics for its feasibility, influencing factors and correlation to the cause of death compared with autopsy. METHODS: Postmortem computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging with fiber tracking were performed in 10 deceased subjects. The Likert scale grading of colored fractional anisotropy maps was correlated to the body temperature and intracranial pathology to assess the diagnostic feasibility of postmortem diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking. RESULTS: Optimal fiber tracking (>15,000 fiber tracts) was achieved with a body temperature at 10°C. Likert scale grading showed no linear correlation (P > 0.7) to fiber tract counts. No statistically significant correlation between total fiber count and postmortem interval could be observed (P = 0.122). Postmortem diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking allowed for radiological diagnosis in cases with shearing injuries but was impaired in cases with pneumencephalon and intracerebral mass hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Postmortem diffusion tensor imaging with fiber tracking provides an exceptional in situ insight "deep into the fibers" of the brain with diagnostic benefit in traumatic brain injury and axonal injuries in the assessment of the underlying cause of death, considering influencing factors for optimal imaging technique.
PURPOSE: In traumatic brain injury, diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging of the brain are essential techniques for determining the pathology sustained and the outcome. Postmortem cross-sectional imaging is an established adjunct to forensic autopsy in death investigation. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate postmortem diffusion tensor imaging in forensics for its feasibility, influencing factors and correlation to the cause of death compared with autopsy. METHODS: Postmortem computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging with fiber tracking were performed in 10 deceased subjects. The Likert scale grading of colored fractional anisotropy maps was correlated to the body temperature and intracranial pathology to assess the diagnostic feasibility of postmortem diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking. RESULTS: Optimal fiber tracking (>15,000 fiber tracts) was achieved with a body temperature at 10°C. Likert scale grading showed no linear correlation (P > 0.7) to fiber tract counts. No statistically significant correlation between total fiber count and postmortem interval could be observed (P = 0.122). Postmortem diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking allowed for radiological diagnosis in cases with shearing injuries but was impaired in cases with pneumencephalon and intracerebral mass hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Postmortem diffusion tensor imaging with fiber tracking provides an exceptional in situ insight "deep into the fibers" of the brain with diagnostic benefit in traumatic brain injury and axonal injuries in the assessment of the underlying cause of death, considering influencing factors for optimal imaging technique.
Authors: Stephan A Bolliger; Michael J Thali; Dominic Gascho; Sebastian A Poschmann; Sebastian Eggert Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Matthew R Walker; Jidan Zhong; Adam C Waspe; Thomas Looi; Karolina Piorkowska; James M Drake; Mojgan Hodaie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura E Jonkman; Martijn D Steenwijk; Nicky Boesen; Annemieke J M Rozemuller; Frederik Barkhof; Jeroen J G Geurts; Linda Douw; Wilma D J van de Berg Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 9.910