Literature DB >> 26132353

Overview and Categorization of Robots Supporting Independent Living of Elderly People: What Activities Do They Support and How Far Have They Developed.

Sandra Bedaf1, Gert Jan Gelderblom, Luc De Witte.   

Abstract

Over the past decades, many robots for the elderly have been developed, supporting different activities of elderly people. A systematic review in four scientific literature databases and a search in article references and European projects was performed in order to create an overview of robots supporting independent living of elderly people. The robots found were categorized based on their development stage, the activity domains they claim to support, and the type of support provided (i.e., physical, non-physical, and/or non-specified). In total, 107 robots for the elderly were identified. Six robots were still in a concept phase, 95 in a development phase, and six of these robots were commercially available. These robots claimed to provide support related to four activity domains: mobility, self-care, interpersonal interaction & relationships, and other activities. Of the many robots developed, only a small percentage is commercially available. Technical ambitions seem to be guiding robot development. To prolong independent living, the step towards physical support is inevitable and needs to be taken. However, it will be a long time before a robot will be capable of supporting multiple activities in a physical manner in the home of an elderly person in order to enhance their independent living.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elderly; independent living; robots

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26132353     DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2014.978916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assist Technol        ISSN: 1040-0435


  9 in total

1.  Understanding healthcare providers' perceptions of a personal assistant robot.

Authors:  Tracy L Mitzner; Lorenza Tiberio; Charles C Kemp; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Gerontechnology       Date:  2018-03

2.  Socially Assistive Robots: Measuring Older Adults' Perceptions.

Authors:  Linda M Beuscher; Jing Fan; Nilanjan Sarkar; Mary S Dietrich; Paul A Newhouse; Karen F Miller; Lorraine C Mion
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.254

3.  Fronto-parietal coding of goal-directed actions performed by artificial agents.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kupferberg; Marco Iacoboni; Virginia Flanagin; Markus Huber; Anna Kasparbauer; Thomas Baumgartner; Gregor Hasler; Florian Schmidt; Christoph Borst; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Efficient Active Sensing with Categorized Further Explorations for a Home Behavior-Monitoring Robot.

Authors:  Wenwei Yu; Keigo Nakahata; Guang Hao Sun; Akio Namiki; Sayuri Suwa; Mayuko Tsujimura; Le Xie; Jinwu Wang; Shao Ying Huang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Could Robots Help Older People with Age-Related Nutritional Problems? Opinions of Potential Users.

Authors:  Sylwia Łukasik; Sławomir Tobis; Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis; Aleksandra Suwalska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Robotic technology for palliative and supportive care: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

Authors:  Amara Callistus Nwosu; Bethany Sturgeon; Tamsin McGlinchey; Christian Dg Goodwin; Ardhendu Behera; Stephen Mason; Sarah Stanley; Terry R Payne
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Effects of a Humanoid Socially Assistive Robot Versus Tablet Training on Psychosocial and Physical Outcomes of Persons With Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Sandra Schüssler; Julia Zuschnegg; Lucas Paletta; Maria Fellner; Gerald Lodron; Josef Steiner; Sandra Pansy-Resch; Lara Lammer; Dimitrios Prodromou; Sebastian Brunsch; Magdalena Holter; Lorenzo Carnevale; Silvia Russegger
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-02-03

8.  Evaluation of a Home Biomonitoring Autonomous Mobile Robot.

Authors:  Enrique Dorronzoro Zubiete; Keigo Nakahata; Nevrez Imamoglu; Masashi Sekine; Guanghao Sun; Isabel Gomez; Wenwei Yu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-24

9.  Kinetic Values, Mobility (in)equalities, and Ageing in Smart Urban Environments.

Authors:  Jaana Parviainen
Journal:  Ethical Theory Moral Pract       Date:  2021-10-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.