Literature DB >> 26131210

Magnetic resonance imaging on disc degeneration changes after implantation of an interspinous spacer and fusion of the adjacent segment.

Xiaokang Liu1, Yingjie Liu1, Xiaofeng Lian1, Jianguang Xu1.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the changes of the lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after the implantation of interspinous device and the fusion of the adjacent segment. A total of 62 consecutive patients suffering L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with concomitant disc space narrowing or low-grade instability up to 5 mm translational slip in L5/S1 level were treated with lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) via posterior approach. Thirty-four of these patients (Coflex group) received an additional implantation of the interspinous spacer device (Coflex™) in the level L4/L5, while the rest of 28 patients (fusion group) underwent the fusion surgery alone. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at pre- and postoperative visits to compare the clinical outcomes and the changes of the L4/L5 vertebral disc degeneration on MRI in both Coflex and fusion group. Although both Coflex and fusion group showed improvements of the clinical outcomes assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after surgery, patients in Coflex group had more significant amelioration (P < 0.05) compared to fusion group. During follow up, the postoperative disc degeneration changes in Coflex group assessed by the relative signal intensity (RSI) differed from those in fusion group (P < 0.05). The supplemental implantation of Coflex™ after the fusion surgery could delay the disc degeneration of the adjacent segment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coflex; adjacent segmental degeneration; spinal fusion

Year:  2015        PMID: 26131210      PMCID: PMC4483992     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  21 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of the spinal stenosis with an interspinous distraction device: do we really restore the foraminal height?

Authors:  Haydar Celik; Alihan Derincek; Ismet Koksal
Journal:  Turk Neurosurg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.003

2.  A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration.

Authors:  Per Ekman; Hans Möller; Adel Shalabi; Yiang Xiao Yu; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The normal aging spine and degenerative spinal disease.

Authors:  Jan T Wilmink
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions.

Authors:  J D Schlegel; J A Smith; R L Schleusener
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The efficacy of lumbar hybrid stabilization using the DIAM to delay adjacent segment degeneration: an intervention comparison study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Sang Hoon Yoon; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Disc height and signal intensity of the nucleus pulposus on magnetic resonance imaging as indicators of lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  K Luoma; T Vehmas; H Riihimäki; R Raininko
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Anterior discectomy and interbody fusion for lumbar disc herniation. A review of 350 cases.

Authors:  S Inoue; T Watanabe; A Hirose; T Tanaka; N Matsui; O Saegusa; E Sho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. A study relating lifetime exposures and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins.

Authors:  M C Battié; T Videman; L E Gibbons; L D Fisher; H Manninen; K Gill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Degeneration of non-fused segments after floating lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Alihan Derincek; Amir Mehbod; Manuel Pinto; Ensor Transfeldt
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.500

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review.

Authors:  Michael Pintauro; Alexander Duffy; Payman Vahedi; George Rymarczuk; Joshua Heller
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

2.  Interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion versus double-segment fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with a minimum follow-up of three years.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Chen; Li Guan; Yu-Zeng Liu; Jin-Cai Yang; Wen-Long Wang; Yong Hai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Interlaminar stabilization offers greater biomechanical advantage compared to interspinous stabilization after lumbar decompression: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Teng Lu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.