Literature DB >> 26130460

Identification of Biomarkers Including 18FDG-PET/CT for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Olivier Humbert1, Jean-Marc Riedinger2, Céline Charon-Barra3, Alina Berriolo-Riedinger4, Isabelle Desmoulins5, Véronique Lorgis5, Salim Kanoun6, Charles Coutant7, Pierre Fumoleau5, Alexandre Cochet8, François Brunotte6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of the metabolic tumor response assessed with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), compared with clinicobiologic markers to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Fifty consecutive women with TNBC and an indication for NAC were prospectively included. Different pretreatment clinical, biologic, and pathologic biomarkers, including SBR grade, the Ki-67 proliferation index, androgen receptor expression, EGF receptor (EGFR), and cytokeratin 5/6 staining, were assessed. Tumor glucose metabolism at baseline and its change after the first cycle of NAC (ΔSUVmax) were assessed using FDG-PET.
RESULTS: The pCR rate was 42%. High Ki-67 proliferation index (P = 0.016), negative EGFR status (P = 0.042), and high ΔSUVmax (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with pCR. In multivariate logistic regression, both negative EGFR status (OR, 6.4; P = 0.043) and high ΔSUVmax (OR, 7.1; P = 0.014) were independent predictors of pCR. Using a threshold at -50%, tumor ΔSUVmax predicted pCR with a negative, a positive predictive value, and an accuracy of 79%, 70%, and 75%, respectively. Combining a low ΔSUVmax and positive EGFR status could predict non-pCR with an accuracy of 92%.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important to define the chemosensitivity of TNBC to NAC early. Combining EGFR status and the metabolic response assessed with FDG-PET can help the physician to early predict the probability of achieving pCR or not. Given these results, the interest of response-guided tailoring of the chemotherapy might be tested in multicenter trials. Clin Cancer Res; 21(24); 5460-8. ©2015 AACR. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26130460     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  19 in total

1.  Prediction of breast cancer recurrence using lymph node metabolic and volumetric parameters from 18F-FDG PET/CT in operable triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Yong-Il Kim; Yong Joong Kim; Jin Chul Paeng; Gi Jeong Cheon; Dong Soo Lee; June-Key Chung; Keon Wook Kang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Karen Ehlers; Edith Motschall; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Werner Vach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the early prediction of pathological response in aggressive subtypes of breast cancer: review of the literature and recommendations for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  David Groheux; David Mankoff; Marc Espié; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Strong association of epidermal growth factor receptor status with breast cancer FDG uptake.

Authors:  Joohee Lee; Eun Jeong Lee; Seung Hwan Moon; Seokhwi Kim; Seung Hyup Hyun; Young Seok Cho; Joon Young Choi; Byung-Tae Kim; Kyung-Han Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Baseline factors predicting a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with implications for non-surgical management of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  R F D van la Parra; A B Tadros; C M Checka; G M Rauch; A Lucci; B D Smith; S Krishnamurthy; V Valero; W T Yang; H M Kuerer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Qualification of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Joshua S Scheuermann; Janet S Reddin; Adam Opanowski; Paul E Kinahan; Barry A Siegel; Lalitha K Shankar; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Tumor metabolism assessed by FDG-PET/CT and tumor proliferation assessed by genomic grade index to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  David Groheux; L Biard; J Lehmann-Che; L Teixeira; F A Bouhidel; B Poirot; P Bertheau; P Merlet; M Espié; M Resche-Rigon; C Sotiriou; P de Cremoux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Feasibility of imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor expression with ZEGFR:2377 affibody molecule labeled with 99mTc using a peptide-based cysteine-containing chelator.

Authors:  Ken G Andersson; Maryam Oroujeni; Javad Garousi; Bogdan Mitran; Stefan Ståhl; Anna Orlova; John Löfblom; Vladimir Tolmachev
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.650

9.  The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Combined With Pretherapeutic Ki67 for Early Prediction of Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jurui Luo; Zhirui Zhou; Zhaozhi Yang; Xingxing Chen; Jinyi Cheng; Zhimin Shao; Xiaomao Guo; Jeffrey Tuan; Xiaolong Fu; Xiaoli Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  PET imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumours using 89Zr-labelled ZEGFR:2377 affibody molecules.

Authors:  Javad Garousi; Ken G Andersson; Bogdan Mitran; Marie-Louise Pichl; Stefan Ståhl; Anna Orlova; John Löfblom; Vladimir Tolmachev
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.