Siddhartha Singh1,2, Yu-Li Lin3, Ann B Nattinger1,2, Yong-Fang Kuo3, James S Goodwin3. 1. Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Medicine and Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of the emergency department (ED) provider and ED facility in readmissions of recently discharged patients who visit the ED has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine the variation in readmission rates by ED facility and ED providers caring for patients after discharge. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using multilevel, multivariable models of 100% Texas Medicare claims data from the years 2007 to 2011. SETTING: Texas acute-care hospitals and ED facilities. PATIENTS: Medicare beneficiaries who visited an ED within 30 days of discharge from a hospital. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENT: Readmission after an ED visit within 30 days of discharge from an initial hospitalization defined as a hospitalization starting the day of or the day following the ED visit. RESULTS: The mean readmission rate following an ED visit was 52.67%. In 2-level models, 14.2% of ED providers readmitted significantly more patients (mean readmission rate of 67.2%) than the mean; 14.7% of ED providers readmitted significantly fewer patients (mean readmission rate of 36.8%) than the mean. After accounting for the ED facility in 3-level models, the variance for the ED providers decreased 65% from 0.2532 to 0.0893. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of readmission varies by ED provider caring for patients after discharge. A large part of this variation is explained by the ED facility in which the ED providers practice. Thus, ED provider practices patterns and ED facility systems of care may be a target for interventions to reduce readmissions.
BACKGROUND: The role of the emergency department (ED) provider and ED facility in readmissions of recently discharged patients who visit the ED has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine the variation in readmission rates by ED facility and ED providers caring for patients after discharge. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using multilevel, multivariable models of 100% Texas Medicare claims data from the years 2007 to 2011. SETTING: Texas acute-care hospitals and ED facilities. PATIENTS: Medicare beneficiaries who visited an ED within 30 days of discharge from a hospital. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENT: Readmission after an ED visit within 30 days of discharge from an initial hospitalization defined as a hospitalization starting the day of or the day following the ED visit. RESULTS: The mean readmission rate following an ED visit was 52.67%. In 2-level models, 14.2% of ED providers readmitted significantly more patients (mean readmission rate of 67.2%) than the mean; 14.7% of ED providers readmitted significantly fewer patients (mean readmission rate of 36.8%) than the mean. After accounting for the ED facility in 3-level models, the variance for the ED providers decreased 65% from 0.2532 to 0.0893. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of readmission varies by ED provider caring for patients after discharge. A large part of this variation is explained by the ED facility in which the ED providers practice. Thus, ED provider practices patterns and ED facility systems of care may be a target for interventions to reduce readmissions.
Authors: Michael A Ross; Jason M Hockenberry; Ryan Mutter; Marguerite Barrett; Matthew Wheatley; Stephen R Pitts Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Adrian F Hernandez; Melissa A Greiner; Gregg C Fonarow; Bradley G Hammill; Paul A Heidenreich; Clyde W Yancy; Eric D Peterson; Lesley H Curtis Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jameel Abualenain; William J Frohna; Robert Shesser; Ru Ding; Mark Smith; Jesse M Pines Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Nathan C Dean; Jason P Jones; Dominik Aronsky; Samuel Brown; Caroline G Vines; Barbara E Jones; Todd Allen Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Drahomir Aujesky; Julie B McCausland; Jeff Whittle; D Scott Obrosky; Donald M Yealy; Michael J Fine Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-11-15 Impact factor: 9.079