Literature DB >> 26126940

Recovery from prolonged deep rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: A randomized comparison of sugammadex reversal with spontaneous recovery.

N Rahe-Meyer1, C Berger, M Wittmann, C Solomon, E A M Abels, H Rietbergen, D A Reuter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) may not always be maintained to the end of surgery and the depth of block may be allowed to gradually diminish over time, particularly if reversal of NMB is not routinely performed. AIM: The current study aimed to assess recovery from deep rocuronium-induced NMB with sugammadex compared with placebo, provide data regarding the extent of residual blockade after deep rocuronium-induced NMB (placebo group), and to determine whether complete and reliable recovery could be provided by sugammadex (sugammadex group).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, safety-assessor-blinded study in adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I to III. Patients with clinically relevant kidney or liver insufficiency were excluded. Anesthesia was administered as routinely practiced at each study site. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered for intubation, with maintenance doses of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg as needed. After the last rocuronium dose, at deep NMB (target depth 1-2 post-tetanic counts), patients received a single dose of sugammadex 4.0 mg/kg or placebo as randomized. The primary endpoint was time from sugammadex or placebo administration to recovery of the train-of-four (TOF) ratio to 0.9. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events, vital signs and physical examination. Patients were also assessed for evidence of residual or recurrence of NMB. With this design, the study will provide data regarding the extent of residual blockade under these conditions (placebo group), and determine whether complete and reliable recovery could be provided by sugammadex (sugammadex group).
RESULTS: Recovery to a TOF ratio of ≥ 0.9 with sugammadex was significantly faster (~ 40 times) than spontaneous recovery: geometric mean (95 % confidence interval) times were 2.2 (1.9-2.5) and 89.8 (80.1-100.7) min, respectively (p < 0.0001, N = 134); maximum spontaneous recovery was 289.8 min. Safety was comparable between groups, with no recurrence of blockade.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a prolonged residual blockade in patients who did not receive sugammadex, with median time to recovery > 1.5 h in the placebo group and one patient taking 4.8 h to achieve a safe level of neuromuscular function recovery following deep NMB. In contrast, sugammadex provided complete and reliable recovery of neuromuscular function (median time to recovery of 2.0 min). Thus, deep NMB with rocuronium until the end of the operation may be possible in combination with sugammadex reversal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26126940     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-015-0048-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  17 in total

1.  Residual curarization in the recovery room after vecuronium.

Authors:  C Baillard; G Gehan; J Reboul-Marty; P Larmignat; C M Samama; M Cupa
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Incidence and duration of residual paralysis at the end of surgery after multiple administrations of cisatracurium and rocuronium.

Authors:  D M Maybauer; G Geldner; M Blobner; F Pühringer; R Hofmockel; C Rex; H F Wulf; L Eberhart; C Arndt; M Eikermann
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: a survey of practice.

Authors:  M Grayling; B P Sweeney
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision.

Authors:  T Fuchs-Buder; C Claudius; L T Skovgaard; L I Eriksson; R K Mirakhur; J Viby-Mogensen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.105

5.  Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit.

Authors:  Glenn S Murphy; Joseph W Szokol; Jesse H Marymont; Steven B Greenberg; Michael J Avram; Jeffery S Vender
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited.

Authors:  J A Aldrete
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  G Geldner; M Niskanen; P Laurila; V Mizikov; M Hübler; G Beck; H Rietbergen; E Nicolayenko
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Sugammadex provides faster reversal of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade compared with neostigmine: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Karin S Khuenl-Brady; Magnus Wattwil; Bernard F Vanacker; José I Lora-Tamayo; Henk Rietbergen; José A Alvarez-Gómez
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe.

Authors:  Mohamed Naguib; Aaron F Kopman; Cynthia A Lien; Jennifer M Hunter; Adriana Lopez; Sorin J Brull
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Reversal of profound vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block under sevoflurane anesthesia: sugammadex versus neostigmine.

Authors:  Hendrikus Jm Lemmens; Mohammad I El-Orbany; James Berry; Jovino Ben Morte; Gavin Martin
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.217

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Sugammadex: A Review of Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Neuromuscular Block and Blocking Agents in 2018.

Authors:  Christoph Unterbuchner
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-04-01

3.  A Clinical and Budgetary Impact Analysis of Introducing Sugammadex for Routine Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in a Hypothetical Cohort in the US.

Authors:  Yiling Jiang; Lori D Bash; Leif Saager
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  The effect of low- versus normal-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on the early quality of recovery with perioperative care according to the enhanced recovery principles (RECOVER): study protocol for a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Kim I Albers; Fatih Polat; Ivo F Panhuizen; Marc M J Snoeck; Gert-Jan Scheffer; Hans D de Boer; Michiel C Warlé
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.