Literature DB >> 19713265

Sugammadex provides faster reversal of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade compared with neostigmine: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

Karin S Khuenl-Brady1, Magnus Wattwil, Bernard F Vanacker, José I Lora-Tamayo, Henk Rietbergen, José A Alvarez-Gómez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex, a specifically designed gamma-cyclodextrin, is a selective relaxant binding drug that rapidly reverses rocuronium-induced and, to a lesser extent, vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. In this study, we compared the efficacy of sugammadex and neostigmine for the reversal of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients scheduled for elective surgery.
METHODS: Patients aged > or = 18 yr, ASA Class I-III, and scheduled for a surgical procedure under sevoflurane/opioid anesthesia received an intubating dose of vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) and maintenance doses of 0.02-0.03 mg/kg at reappearance of the second twitch (T(2)) of train-of-four (TOF) if required. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using acceleromyography (TOF-Watch SX, Schering-Plough Ireland, Dublin, Ireland). At end of surgery, at reappearance of T(2) after the last dose of vecuronium, patients were randomized to receive either sugammadex (2 mg/kg) or neostigmine (50 microg/kg) plus glycopyrrolate (10 microg/kg) i.v.. The primary efficacy end-point was time from start of administration of sugammadex or neostigmine to recovery of TOF ratio to 0.9.
RESULTS: The geometric mean time to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9 was significantly faster with sugammadex compared with neostigmine (2.7 min [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 2.2-3.3) versus 17.9 min [95% CI: 13.1-24.3], respectively; P < 0.0001). The mean recovery times to a TOF ratio of 0.8 and 0.7 were also significantly shorter with sugammadex. No serious adverse events or unexpected side effects were reported with either drug.
CONCLUSION: Sugammadex provided significantly faster reversal of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade compared with neostigmine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19713265     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac53c3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  34 in total

1.  Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Effects on Reintubation for Respiratory Failure or Newly Initiated Noninvasive Ventilation: An Interrupted Time Series Design.

Authors:  Martin Krause; Shannon K McWilliams; Kenneth J Bullard; Lena M Mayes; Leslie C Jameson; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Karsten Bartels
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults.

Authors:  Ana-Marija Hristovska; Patricia Duch; Mikkel Allingstrup; Arash Afshari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-14

3.  Sugammadex.

Authors:  Dennis J Cada; Terri L Levien; Danial E Baker
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-07

Review 4.  Sugammadex: A Review of Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Flucloxacillin and diclofenac do not cause recurrence of neuromuscular blockade after reversal with sugammadex.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan de Kam; Michiel W van den Heuvel; Peter Grobara; Alex Zwiers; Jean-Luc Jadoul; Erik de Clerck; Steven Ramael; Pierre A M Peeters
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Respiratory events with sugammadex vs. neostigmine following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective pilot study assessing neuromuscular reversal strategies.

Authors:  Shmuel Evron; Yuri Abelansky; Tiberiu Ezri; Alexander Izakson
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2017-10

7.  Neuromuscular Block and Blocking Agents in 2018.

Authors:  Christoph Unterbuchner
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-04-01

8.  Recovery from prolonged deep rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: A randomized comparison of sugammadex reversal with spontaneous recovery.

Authors:  N Rahe-Meyer; C Berger; M Wittmann; C Solomon; E A M Abels; H Rietbergen; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Effect of sugammadex on QT/QTc interval prolongation when combined with QTc-prolonging sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan de Kam; Peter Grobara; Justin Dennie; Guy Cammu; Steven Ramael; Marjan L F Jagt-Smook; Michiel W van den Heuvel; Rob J W Berg; Pierre A M Peeters
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  [Algorithm-based preventive strategies for avoidance of residual neuromuscular blocks].

Authors:  C Unterbuchner; K Ehehalt; B Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.