| Literature DB >> 26126706 |
Melinda Paholcsek1, Gabor Fidler2, Jozsef Konya3, Laszlo Rejto4, Gabor Mehes5, Evelin Bukta6, Juergen Loeffler7, Sandor Biro8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We assessed the diagnostic value of standard clinical methods and combined biomarker testing (galactomannan assay and polymerase chain reaction screening) in a prospective case-control study to detect invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematological malignancies and prolonged neutropenia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26126706 PMCID: PMC4487853 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-0995-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Results of combined biomarker testing of patients with febrile neutropeniaa at the University Hospitals of Debrecenb
| Patient ID | Underlying condition | Sex, age (yr) | EORTC/MSG classification | No. of specimens per episode | No. of GM specimens | No. of PCR specimens | No. of PCR runs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | |||||
| 1 | PTCL | M, 18 | possible | 8 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 2 | NHL | M, 15 | possible | 14 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 19 |
| 3 | OM | M, 16 | possible | 16 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 21 |
| 4 | AML | M, 26 | proven | 18 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 18 | 15 |
| 5 | OM | F, 53 | possible | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 6 | AML | M, 55 | possible | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | AML | M, 52 | proven | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 8 | AML | F, 28 | proven | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| 9 | MM | M, 70 | possible | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 10 | ALL | F, 27 | probable | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 1 |
| 11 | OM | M, 57 | possible | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 12 | OM | F, 66 | possible | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 13 | AML | F, 55 | probable | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 4 |
| 14 | AML | F, 46 | possible | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | MM | F, 44 | possible | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | OM | M, 56 | proven | 6 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 17 | HL | F, 26 | possible | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | AML | F, 50 | possible | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 19 | ALL | M, 14 | possible | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | AML | F, 45 | possible | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | OM | M, 17 | possible | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | OM | F, 19 | possible | 8 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| 23 | NHL | M, 57 | possible | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | AML | M, 36 | possible | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | NHL | M, 75 | proven | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | AML | M, 49 | possible | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | OM | M, 16 | possible | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total: | 162 | 77 | 85 | 249 | ||||||
aNeutrophil count < 0,5 × 109 cells/L; bUniversity of Debrecen, Institute of Internal Medicine; AML Acute Myeloid Leukemia, ALL Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, MM Myeloma Multiplex, NHL Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, PTCL Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma, OMs other malignancies, P present, A absent, NP not performed, CT thoracic computed tomography, BAL bronchoscopy with lavage
Fig. 1Representation of the discriminatory power of Aspergillus GM-EIA (a) and BAL (b) when combining these with chest CT. a CT+-GM+; episodes proved to be positive when testing both by CT and Aspergillus GM-EIA, CT+-GM−; episodes proved to be positive when scanning by CT and negative when testing by Aspergillus GM-EIA, CT−-GM+; episodes proved to be negative when scanning by CT and positive when testing by Aspergillus GM-EIA, PCR−-GM−; episodes proved to be negative when testing by both CT and Aspergillus GM-EIA. Black symbols represent controls while red symbols represent cases. Contoured symbols represent episodes with ceased fever, while shaded symbols represent episodes with present or recurrent fever refractory to broad spectrum antibiotic treatment. Small sized symbols represent children. Numbers denote patient ID numbers. b CT+-BAL+; episodes proved to be positive when testing both by CT scanning and BAL, CT+-BAL−; episodes proved to be positive when testing by thoracic CT and negative when testing by BAL, CT−-BAL+; episodes proved to be negative when testing by thoracic CT and positive when testing by BAL, CT−-BAL−; episodes proved to be negative when testing both by thoracic CT and BAL. Black colored symbols represent controls while red colored symbols represent cases. Contoured symbols represent episodes with ceased fever, while shaded symbols represent episodes with present or recurrent fever refractory to broad spectrum antibiotic treatment. Small sized symbols represent children. Numbers denote patient ID numbers
Diagnostic performance of GM-ELISA and facC-PCR when testing serum samples
| Parameter | Platelia |
|
|---|---|---|
| % Se (95 % CI) | 52,63 (28,90-75,51) | 69,23 (48,21-85,63) |
| % Sp (95 % CI) | 98,31 (90,88-99,72) | 68,85 (55,71-80,09) |
| LR+ | 31,05 | 2,22 |
| LR- | 0,48 | 0,45 |
| PV+ % | 90,91 | 48,65 |
| PV- % | 86,57 | 84,00 |
| DOR (95 % CI) | 64,44 (7,342-565,694) | 4,974 (1,81-13,434) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated diagnostic performance for Platelia Aspergillus GM-EIA and facC-PCR at the standard cutoff OD450/620≧0.5 for GM-EIA and by considering ≧1 positive Cq as significant/triplicate. Performance parameters calculated after stratification corrections based on autopsy data are highlighted with bold letters. Se sensitivity, Sp specificity, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, LR+ likelihood ratio positive, LR- likelihood ratio negative, DOR, PV+ positive predictive value, PV- negative predictive values
Fig. 2Data on CBT in fevered neutropenia episodes at the University Hospitals of Debrecen. (✤) Neutrophil count less than 500/mm3. (✔) persistent fever for more than 96 h, refractory to antibiotic treatment, (group I patients); (✘) lack of persistent fever more than 96 h, (group II patients); (‡) according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. (FNE); febrile neutropenia episode. There were in total 162 tests (mean; 2.93 ± 2.14/FNE) performed. 77 serum specimens (mean; 2.79 ± 1.89/FNE) were screened for the presence of GM antigen and 85 PCRs (mean; 3,07 ± 2.39/FNE) were performed supported by 249 runs (mean; 9 ± 7.02/FNE) and targeting special fungal nucleic acid marker genes (facC-PCR) of prokaryotic origin. Reporting of descriptivce statistics with mean values and standard error (±SE) are shown
Fig. 3Diagnostic performance (receiver operating characteristic curves) for Aspergillus GM-EIA and facC-PCR methods. ROC curve illustrating the diagnostic performance of GM-EIA and facC-PCR at different discriminatory thresholds by plotting true positives (sensitivity) against false positives (1-specificty)
Fig. 4Venn-diagrams with section-analysis comparing the outcomes of Platelia Aspergillus GM-EIA and facC-PCR. TP true-positive, FN false-negative, TN true-negative, FP false-positive. Cases (proven and probable IA) with positive GM-EIA and PCR results were regarded as true positive (TP) while those with negative outcomes were considered to be false negative (FN). Controls (unclassified patients with no EORTC/MSG evidence of IA) with negative GM-EIA and PCR results were coded to true negative (TN) and those with positive outcomes false positive (FP). a 27 of 32 (84 %) and 9 of 24 (38 %) serum samples from cases (proven/probable) proved to be true positive (TP) when testing with facC-PCR and GM-EIA respectively. GM-EIA failed to detect 15 of 24 and facC-PCR 5 of 32 samples. Section analysis: 8 of 24 specimens from cases (33 %) proved to be true positive (TP) with both assays and 3 of 24 (8 %) found to be negative (FN) by both of them. There was only one specimen (4 %) of 24 that was missed by facC-PCR but not by GM-EIA. 50 % of specimens (12 of 24) however were detected only by PCR but not with GM-EIA. b 51 of 53 (96 %) and 44 of 53 (83 %) serum specimens from controls (unclassified patients with no evidence of IA) proved to be negative (TN) thus 2 of 53 (3,8 %) and 9 of 53 (17 %) were undetected. There were 9 of 53 (17 %) specimens that proved to be false-positive with PCR but real-negative with GM and only 2 of 53 (4 %) that proved to be false-positive with GM-EIA but true-negative with facC-PCR. Section analysis: 83 % of specimens (44 of 53) remained consistently negative with both of the assays but there were none that proved to be false-positive when testing with both methods