Literature DB >> 26126159

Comparing outcome of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's with high grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: a prospective multicenter UK registry.

Rehan J Haidry1, Gideon Lipman1, Matthew R Banks1, Mohammed A Butt1, Vinay Sehgal1, David Graham1, Jason M Dunn2, Abhinav Gupta3, Rami Sweis1, Haroon Miah1, Danielle Morris3, Howard L Smart4, Pradeep Bhandari5, Robert Willert6, Grant Fullarton7, Jonathon Morris7, Massimo Di Pietro8, Charles Gordon9, Ian Penman10, High Barr11, Praful Patel12, Philip Boger12, Neil Kapoor13, Brinder Mahon14, Jonathon Hoare15, Ravi Narayanasamy16, Dermot O'Toole16, Edward Cheong17, Natalie C Direkze18, Yeng Ang19, Andrew Veitch20, Anjan Dhar21, David Nyalender22, Krish Ragunath23, Anthony Leahy24, Mark Fullard24, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo3, Marco Novelli3, Laurence B Lovat1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Mucosal neoplasia arising in Barrett's esophagus can be successfully treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with high grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal cancer (IMC) at baseline from the United Kingdom RFA registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prior to RFA, visible lesions and nodularity were removed entirely by EMR. Thereafter, patients underwent RFA every 3 months until all visible Barrett's mucosa was ablated or cancer developed (end points). Biopsies were taken at 12 months or when end points were reached.
RESULTS: A total of 515 patients, 384 with HGD and 131 with IMC, completed treatment. Prior to RFA, EMR was performed for visible lesions more frequently in the IMC cohort than in HGD patients (77 % vs. 47 %; P < 0.0001). The 12-month complete response for dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were almost identical in the two cohorts (HGD 88 % and 76 %, respectively; IMC 87 % and 75 %, respectively; P = 0.7). Progression to invasive cancer was not significantly different at 12 months (HGD 1.8 %, IMC 3.8 %; P = 0.19). A trend towards slightly worse medium-term durability may be emerging in IMC patients (P = 0.08). In IMC, EMR followed by RFA was definitely associated with superior durability compared with RFA alone (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The Registry reports on endoscopic therapy for Barrett's neoplasia, representing real-life outcomes. Patients with IMC were more likely to have visible lesions requiring initial EMR than those with HGD, and may carry a higher risk of cancer progression in the medium term. The data consolidate the approach to ensuring that these patients undergo thorough endoscopic work-up, including EMR prior to RFA when necessary. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26126159     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  14 in total

1.  Development and validation of a risk prediction model to diagnose Barrett's oesophagus (MARK-BE): a case-control machine learning approach.

Authors:  Avi Rosenfeld; David G Graham; Sarah Jevons; Jose Ariza; Daryl Hagan; Ash Wilson; Samuel J Lovat; Sarmed S Sami; Omer F Ahmad; Marco Novelli; Manuel Rodriguez Justo; Alison Winstanley; Eliyahu M Heifetz; Mordehy Ben-Zecharia; Uria Noiman; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Peter Sasieni; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2019-12-05

Review 2.  How I Approach It: Care of the Post-Ablation Barrett's Esophagus Patient.

Authors:  Shervin Shafa; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Ablation Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus: New Rules for Changing Times.

Authors:  Nour Hamade; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-08-17

Review 4.  Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in Endoscopic Treatment and Follow-Up of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-03-18

5.  'Missed' oesophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus patients: A large population-based study.

Authors:  Margreet van Putten; Brian T Johnston; Liam J Murray; Anna T Gavin; Damian T McManus; Shivaram Bhat; Richard C Turkington; Helen G Coleman
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Etiology and Prevention of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Chung S Yang; Xiaoxin Chen; Shuiping Tu
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-02-03

Review 7.  Monitoring the premalignant potential of Barrett's oesophagus'.

Authors:  David Graham; Gideon Lipman; Vinay Sehgal; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-05

8.  Non-radical, stepwise complete endoscopic resection of Barrett's epithelium in short segment Barrett's esophagus has a low stricture rate.

Authors:  Andreas Koutsoumpas; Lai Mun Wang; Adam A Bailey; Richard Gillies; Robert Marshall; Michael Booth; Bruno Sgromo; Nick Maynard; Barbara Braden
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-12-02

9.  The utility of a methylation panel in the assessment of clinical response to radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Vinod V Subhash; William Waldock; Daniel I Fernando; Giorgio Bartalucci; Hamza Chettouh; Ahmad Miremadi; Maria O'Donovan; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Massimiliano di Pietro
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  Comparative outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's oesophagus with different baseline histology.

Authors:  Wei Keith Tan; Arti Rattan; Maria O'Donovan; Tara Nuckcheddy; Bincy Alias; Vijay Sujendran; Massimiliano di Pietro
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.