Literature DB >> 26125297

Low Dose Computed Tomography for 3D Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation of Radiation Exposure and Image Quality.

Alexander Huppertz1, Alexander Lembcke, El-Hadi Sariali, Tahir Durmus, Carsten Schwenke, Bernd Hamm, Martin Sparmann, Alexander D J Baur.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare radiation exposure and image quality between dedicated computed tomography (CT) protocols for preoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) planning.
METHODS: Three protocols with automated tube current modulation using 64-slice (n = 177) and 128-slice CT scanners without (n = 129) and with automated tube voltage preselection (n = 84) were compared.
RESULTS: All 390 CTs were of sufficient quality for THA planning. Mean DLP was 235.0 mGy*cm (effective dose 2.8 mSv). Lowest radiation exposure (2.5 mSv) was seen with automated voltage preselection and the algorithm's selection was 100 kV (90.5% of patients) and 120 kV. Lowest image noise was seen in the highest dose group (3.1 mSv, 128-slice CT fixed tube voltage). A significant difference in cortical bone radiodensity was seen between 100 kV and 120 kV (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative pelvic CT for THA planning is possible with very low radiation dose and reliable quality. Automated voltage preselection further decreases the effective dose by 18.2%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26125297     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  7 in total

1.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal anterior femoral flare and torsion. Anatomic bases for metaphyseally fixed short stems design.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Yohan Knaffo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Low-Dose Computed Tomography Reduces Radiation Exposure by 90% Compared With Traditional Computed Tomography Among Patients Undergoing Hip-Preservation Surgery.

Authors:  Alvin W Su; Travis J Hillen; Eric P Eutsler; Asheesh Bedi; James R Ross; Christopher M Larson; John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  The Use of Computerized Tomography Scans in Elective Knee and Hip Arthroplasty-What Do They Tell Us and at What Risk?

Authors:  Taylor D'Amore; Gregg Klein; Jess Lonner
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-05

Review 4.  Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue Quantification by Imaging.

Authors:  Ebrahim Bani Hassan; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Mahdi Imani; Numan Kutaiba; David K Wright; Tara Sepehrizadeh; Gustavo Duque
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Three-dimensional planning-guided total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive direct anterior approach. Clinical outcomes at five years' follow-up.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Yves Catonne; Hugues Pascal-Moussellard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  A higher reliability with a computed tomography scan-based three dimensional technique than with a two dimensional measurement for lower limb discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty planning.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Matthias Mueller; Shahnaz Klouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Accuracy of image-free navigation in intraoperative leg length change from total hip arthroplasty using evaluations from 2D and 3D measurements.

Authors:  Shine Tone; Masahiro Hasegawa; Yohei Naito; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.