Literature DB >> 26124618

Microbiological Assessment of Indoor Air of Teaching Hospital Wards: A case of Jimma University Specialized Hospital.

Samuel Fekadu1, Bahilu Getachewu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital environment represents a congenial situation where microorganisms and susceptible patients are indoors together. Thus, the objective of this study is to provide fundamental data related to the microbial quality of indoor air of Jimma University Specialized Hospital wards, to estimate the health hazard and to create standards for indoor air quality control.
METHODS: The microbial quality of indoor air of seven wards of Jimma University Specialized Hospital was determined. Passive air sampling technique, using open Petri-dishes containing different culture media, was employed to collect sample twice daily.
RESULTS: The concentrations of bacteria and fungi aerosols in the indoor environment of the wards ranged between 2123 - 9733 CFU/m(3). The statistical analysis showed that the concentrations of bacteria that were measured in all studied wards were significantly different from each other (p-value=0.017), whereas the concentrations of fungi that were measured in all sampled wards were not significantly different from each other (p-value=0.850). Moreover, the concentrations of bacteria that were measured at different sampling time (morning and afternoon) were significantly different (p-value =0.001).
CONCLUSION: All wards that were included in the study were heavily contaminated with bacteria and fungi. Thus, immediate interventions are needed to control those environmental factors which favor the growth and multiplication of microbes, and it is vital to control visitors and students in and out the wards. Moreover, it is advisable that strict measures be put in place to check the increasing microbial load in the hospital environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; Fungi; Hospital environment; Indoor air; Microbiological assessment; Open-plate technique; Sedimentation technique

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26124618      PMCID: PMC4478262          DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v25i2.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci        ISSN: 1029-1857


Introduction

Air pollution, both indoor and outdoor, is one of the most severe roblems of our time. Several airborne diseases have been related to the indoor air quality (1, 2). Indoor air quality is a significant issue in healthcare. Healthcare facilities have to pay particular care and attention to indoor air concerns due to the presence of air borne microorganism that may cause nosocomial infection (3, 4, 5, 6, 7). People with pre-existing health problems who are going through treatment and those who may have depressed immune systems are very susceptible to indoor air exposures. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention of U.S. estimates that more than two million patients acquire infections per year in U.S. hospitals, while they are hospitalized for other health problems, and that 88,000 die as a direct or indirect result (8). The hospital environment thus represents a congenial situation where microorganisms and susceptible patients are together indoors. As stated by Riley “the enclosed atmosphere of a hospital building and its human occupants constitute an ecological unit'’ (9). For this reason, hospital environmental control procedures can be an effective support in reducing nosocomial infections (10, 11). The healthcare facilities, especially in developing countries, are complex settings where factors such as overcrowding, improper design and poor ventilation can impact on the growth and survival of microorganism which is harmful to human health. A study done on the interaction of building designs and microbial load showed that, there are high microbial loads for those buildings which did not include vents, proper situation of windows and doors, as well as low head-roof (15). Moreover, the activity of people and equipment within the indoor environments is thought to be the principal factor contributing to the buildup and spread of airborne microbial contaminations (4, 12, 15, 16). Therefore, this study was designed to see the extent of indoor air microbial contamination in the maternity, surgical and medical wards of Jimma University Specialized Hospital. The findings of this study are helpful to evaluate the adequacy of environmental control procedures of ward environments.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted from February to June, 2013 in Jimma University Specialized Hospital (JUSH). Jimma University Specialized Hospital is the only teaching and referral hospital in the southwestern part of Ethiopia. It has a bed capacity of 450 and a total of more than 750 staffs of both supportive and professional. It provides services for approximately 9000 inpatient and 80000 outpatient attendances a year coming from the catchment population of about 15,000 million people. Seven wards were used for sample collection and these included two maternity wards, three surgical wards and two medical wards. Bacteria and fungi measurement were made by passive air sampling technique: the settle plate method using 9cm diameter Petri dishes (63.585 cm2 areas) (17). The sampling height which approximated the human breathing zone was 1m above the floor and at the center of the room. Bacteria and fungi were collected on 2% nutrient agar and 4% sabouroad agar respectively. To avoid self-contamination of agar plate during air sampling, sterile gloves, mouth masks and protective gown were worn, and before it was used the agar plate was checked visually for any microbial growth. To obtain the appropriate surface density for counting and to determine the load with respect to time of exposure, the sampling times were set at 30, 60, 90 minutes. Moreover, samples were collected twice a day at 8:30am and 4:00pm by taking into consideration the variation of density of occupant and environmental factors. After exposure, the sample were taken to the laboratory (Department of Environmental Health Science and Technology, Jimma University) and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours for bacteria and at 25°C for 3 days for fungi. Once colony forming units (CFU) were enumerated, colony forming units per cubic meter (CFU /m3) were determined, taking into account the following equation described by Omeliansky (18,19): N = 5a · 104 (bt)−1, Where N: microbial CFU/m3 of indoor air; a: number of colonies per Petri dish; b: dish surface, cm2; t: exposure time, minutes. SPSS Statistics version 16.0 software was applied to determine the likelihood of statistically significant differences between the concentrations of bacteria and fungi measured at different sampling places and the linearity was determined between the concentrations of bacteria and fungi measured.

Results

The indoor air microbial loads of seven wards of Jimma University Teaching Hospital were determined by taking 84 samples. The results of the research into the concentration, concentration range, arithmetic mean and standard deviation of bacteria and fungi aerosol present in the investigated wards are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3. And the microbial air quality standard of the wards is indicated in Table 4.
Table 1

Number of bacterial colony counts (CFU) per m3 air at different sampling time of day at different time of exposure

Sampling sitesSampling time
8:30am4:00pm
Petri dish exposure time (Minutes)Petri dish exposure time (Minutes)
30 (Min.)60 (Min.)90 (Min.)30 (Min.)60 (Min.)90 (Min.)
Maternity W01335532903425830988079733
Maternity W02314532113355846687028021
Surgical W01364331595090319843906029
Surgical W02332931064893338142726002
Surgical W03340843514954356545486291
Medical W01542668817514692078247968
Medical W02568868027444723474837898
Table 2

Number of fungi colony counts (CFU) per m3 air at different sampling time of day at different time of exposure

Sampling sitesSampling time
8:30am4:00pm
Petri dish exposure time (Minutes)Petri dish exposure time (Minutes)
30 (Min.)60 (Min.)90 (Min.)30 (Min.)60 (Min.)90 (Min.)
Maternity W01222824772787356536964106
Maternity W02228023462665335535394072
Surgical W01225426603311267430413049
Surgical W02241127003268256930013067
Surgical W03288327783408301429233006
Medical W01290928443477212329754010
Medical W02275229233408249031594168
Table 3

The range of microbe's distribution at Jimma University Specialized Hospital wards

NMinimumMaximumMeanStd. Deviation
Bacteria CFU/m3423106973355832053
Fungi CFU/m342212341683008525
Valid N (list wise)42
Table 4

An assessment of air quality in the selected wards of Jimma University Specialized Hospital according to the sanitary standards for non-industrial premises

Group of microbesRange of values (CFU/m3)Pollution degreeSampling Sites and time
Maternity W01Maternity W02Surgical W01Surgical W02Surgical W03Medical W01Medical W02
8:30 am4pm8:30 am4pm8:30 am4pm8:30 am4pm8:30 am4pm8:30 am4pm8:30 am4 pm
Bacteria< 50Very Low
50–100Low
100–500Intermediate
500–2000High
>2000Very high
 
Fungi< 25Very Low
25–100Low
100–500Intermediate
500–2000High
>2000Very high
Number of bacterial colony counts (CFU) per m3 air at different sampling time of day at different time of exposure Number of fungi colony counts (CFU) per m3 air at different sampling time of day at different time of exposure The range of microbe's distribution at Jimma University Specialized Hospital wards An assessment of air quality in the selected wards of Jimma University Specialized Hospital according to the sanitary standards for non-industrial premises The results indicate that the highest bacterial colony forming unit per m3 air was recorded at 4:00 pm in Maternity W01 ward at 90 minutes exposure. This was 9733 CFU/m3. While the lowest bacterial colony forming unit per m3 air was recorded at 8:30am in Surgical W02 ward at 60 minutes exposure. This was 3106 CFU/m3 (Tables 1 and 3). The highest fungi colony forming unit per m3 air was recorded at 4:00pm in Medical W02 ward at 90 minutes exposure (4168 CFU/m3) and the lowest fungi colony forming unit per m3 air was recorded at 4:00pm in Medical W01 ward at 30 minutes exposure (2123 CFU/m3) as can be seen on Tables 2 and 3. The scatter plots of bacteria versus fungi concentration that have been measured in all sampled wards, shows strong positive linear associations (p-value =0.001) with regression coefficient (R2=0.52, n=42) as presented in figure 1.
Figure 1

Correlation between fungi and bacteria concentration at Jimma University Specialized Hospital wards

Correlation between fungi and bacteria concentration at Jimma University Specialized Hospital wards

Discussion

Hospital related infections have been linked with many factors among which are the microbial qualities of the indoor air of different wards of each hospital (20). The concentrations of bacteria and fungi aerosols in the indoor environment of Jimma University Specialized Hospital wards, estimated with the use of the settle plate method, ranged between 2123 – 9733 CFU/m3. There is no uniform international standard available on levels and acceptable maximum bioaerosol loads (21). Different countries have different standards. The work conducted by a WHO expert group on assessment of health risks of biological agents in indoor environments suggested that total microbial load should not exceed 1000 CFU/m3. If higher than this, the environment is considered as contaminated (22). Other authors consider that 300 CFU/m3 and 750 CFU/m3 should be the limit for fungi and bacteria respectively (23, 24). The quantitative interpretation of the results describing the air quality in the wards of JUSH was evaluated based on the sanitary standards for non-industrial premises formulated by the European Commission in 1993 (25). According to this classification, all wards that were included in the study were not in hygienic conditions (Table 4). These might be because of the number of individuals in the wards. At the time of this study, all wards were at their maximum capacity, as of visitors in and out the wards, the high density of patients and the presence of high number of health science students in the wards. Thereby increasing the shading of bacteria and agitation of air as it was indicated in previous studies (26, 27, 28). Beside these, the environmental factors, mainly insufficient ventilation system might also contribute to the high microbial loads of the wards as indicated in the study done by Wamedo et al. 2012 (15). Moreover, as indicated in the result part, the scatter plots of the bacteria concentration versus fungi concentration show strong positive linear associations (p-value =0.001). These prove that, the indoor air environmental factors of the wards are favoring the growth and development of bacteria and fungi population. The statistical analysis showed that the concentrations of bacteria that were measured in all wards were significantly different from each other (p-value=0.017). Moreover, the concentrations of bacteria that were measured at different sampling time (morning and afternoon) were also significantly different (p-value =0.001). These can be mainly explained by the variation of density of occupants during sampling time as well as the variation of environmental factors (15, 29). Whereas the concentrations of fungi that were measured in all sampled wards were not significantly different to each other (p-value=0.850), suggesting that most fungi species present into the air were not human-borne. Similar observations by others are in agreement with these data (30, 31, 32). In Conclusion, all wards that were included in the study were heavily contaminated with bacteria and fungi. The high bacteria and fungi concentrations of air obtained in this study might be potential risk factors for spread of nosocomial infection in JUSH. Thus, immediate interventions is needed to control those environmental factors which favor the growth and multiplication of microbes, and the Hospital needs to increase the number of wards to make them sufficient for the inpatients that come from catchment area. It is also vital to control visitors and students in and out of the wards. Moreover, it is advisable that strict measures be put in place to check the increasing microbial load in the hospital environment. Additionally, it is necessary to adopt the guidelines for the design and construction of new health-care facilities and for renovation of existing facilities in order to control indoor air-quality. Experiences can be taken from the American Institute of Architects (AIA) that published excellent guidelines. These AIA guidelines address indoor air-quality standards (e.g., ventilation rates, temperature levels, humidity levels, pressure relationships, and minimum air changes per hour [ACH]) specific to each zone or area in health-care facilities (e.g., operating rooms, laboratories, diagnostic areas, patient-care areas, and support departments) (33).
  14 in total

Review 1.  The index of microbial air contamination.

Authors:  C Pasquarella; O Pitzurra; A Savino
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Detection and enumeration of airborne biocontaminants.

Authors:  Linda D Stetzenbach; Mark P Buttner; Patricia Cruz
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.740

3.  Prevention of surgical-site infections.

Authors:  Karen D Weiss; Steven F Osborne; Priscilla Callahan-Lyon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Association of air-conditioning with respiratory symptoms in office workers in tropical climate.

Authors:  G S Graudenz; C H Oliveira; A Tribess; C Mendes; M R D O Latorre; J Kalil
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  Impact of intraoperative behavior on surgical site infections.

Authors:  Guido Beldi; Sonja Bisch-Knaden; Vanessa Banz; Kathrin Mühlemann; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Basic mechanisms in asthma.

Authors:  S I Wasserman
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1988-05

7.  The ecology of indoor atmospheres: airborne infection in hospitals.

Authors:  R L Riley
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1972-08

Review 8.  Building-related illnesses.

Authors:  D Menzies; J Bourbeau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Metabolic activity of moulds as a factor of building materials biodegradation.

Authors:  Beata Gutarowska
Journal:  Pol J Microbiol       Date:  2010

10.  Indoor airborne bacterial communities are influenced by ventilation, occupancy, and outdoor air source.

Authors:  J F Meadow; A E Altrichter; S W Kembel; J Kline; G Mhuireach; M Moriyama; D Northcutt; T K O'Connor; A M Womack; G Z Brown; J L Green; B J M Bohannan
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.770

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review on bio-aerosols in healthcare and the dental environment.

Authors:  Charifa Zemouri; Hans de Soet; Wim Crielaard; Alexa Laheij
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Indoor air microbial load, antibiotic susceptibility profiles of bacteria, and associated factors in different wards of Arba Minch General Hospital, southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Gebre Kayta; Aseer Manilal; Dagimawie Tadesse; Munira Siraj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Indoor Air at Different Hospital Sites of Dilla University: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Zemachu Ashuro; Kuma Diriba; Abel Afework; Gose Husen Washo; Abriham Shiferaw Areba; Girum G/Meskel Kanno; Habtamu Endashaw Hareru; Abdene Weya Kaso; Mehret Tesfu
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Investigation of indoor and outdoor air quality in a university campus during COVID-19 lock down period.

Authors:  Mansoor Ahmad Bhat; Fatma Nur Eraslan; Alaa Awad; Semra Malkoç; Özlem Özden Üzmez; Tuncay Döğeroğlu; Eftade O Gaga
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 7.093

5.  High bacterial load of indoor air in hospital wards: the case of University of Gondar teaching hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zemichael Gizaw; Mulat Gebrehiwot; Chalachew Yenew
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2016-07-05

6.  Characterization of culturable airborne bacteria and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of indoor and immediate-outdoor environments of a research institute in Ghana.

Authors:  Isawumi Abiola; Adiza Abass; Samuel Duodu; Lydia Mosi
Journal:  AAS Open Res       Date:  2018-08-20

7.  Distribution and comparison of bacterial communities in HVAC systems of two university buildings: Implications for indoor air quality and public health.

Authors:  Timothy Sibanda; Ramganesh Selvarajan; Henry Jo Ogola; Chinedu Christopher Obieze; Memory Tekere
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Assessment of Airborne Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Shahrekord Hospitals.

Authors:  Davood Jalili; MohamadHadi Dehghani; Abdolmajid Fadaei; Mahmood Alimohammadi
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2021-04-24

9.  Microbial Indoor Air Quality and Associated Factors in Jimma Town Prison Administration, Southwestern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mahmud Ahmednur; Hanan Awel; Gutama Haile
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-08-19

10.  Surfaces and Air Bacteriology of Selected Wards at a Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hailu Getachew; Awoke Derbie; Daniel Mekonnen
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.