Literature DB >> 26124216

Three-Dimensional Bioprinting for Regenerative Dentistry and Craniofacial Tissue Engineering.

F Obregon1, C Vaquette2, S Ivanovski3, D W Hutmacher2, L E Bertassoni4.   

Abstract

Craniofacial tissues are organized with complex 3-dimensional (3D) architectures. Mimicking such 3D complexity and the multicellular interactions naturally occurring in craniofacial structures represents one of the greatest challenges in regenerative dentistry. Three-dimensional bioprinting of tissues and biological structures has been proposed as a promising alternative to address some of these key challenges. It enables precise manufacture of various biomaterials with complex 3D architectures, while being compatible with multiple cell sources and being customizable to patient-specific needs. This review describes different 3D bioprinting methods and summarizes how different classes of biomaterials (polymer hydrogels, ceramics, composites, and cell aggregates) may be used for 3D biomanufacturing of scaffolds, as well as craniofacial tissue analogs. While the fabrication of scaffolds upon which cells attach, migrate, and proliferate is already in use, printing of all the components that form a tissue (living cells and matrix materials together) to produce tissue constructs is still in its early stages. In summary, this review seeks to highlight some of the key advantages of 3D bioprinting technology for the regeneration of craniofacial structures. Additionally, it stimulates progress on the development of strategies that will promote the translation of craniofacial tissue engineering from the laboratory bench to the chair side. © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; biofabrication; bone regeneration; craniofacial regeneration; guided tissue regeneration; tissue scaffolds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26124216     DOI: 10.1177/0022034515588885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  42 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells.

Authors:  Lauren N West-Livingston; Jihoon Park; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Use of 3-D printing technologies in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review.

Authors:  Suhani Ghai; Yogesh Sharma; Neha Jain; Mrinal Satpathy; Ajay Kumar Pillai
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-25

3.  A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Holmes; Kartik Bulusu; Michael Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  IGFBP5 enhances osteogenic differentiation potential of periodontal ligament stem cells and Wharton's jelly umbilical cord stem cells, via the JNK and MEK/Erk signalling pathways.

Authors:  Yuejun Wang; Zhi Jia; Shu Diao; Xiao Lin; Xiaomeng Lian; Liping Wang; Rui Dong; Dayong Liu; Zhipeng Fan
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 5.  Messenger RNA Delivery for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications.

Authors:  Siddharth Patel; Avathamsa Athirasala; Paula P Menezes; N Ashwanikumar; Ting Zou; Gaurav Sahay; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  A dentin-derived hydrogel bioink for 3D bioprinting of cell laden scaffolds for regenerative dentistry.

Authors:  Avathamsa Athirasala; Anthony Tahayeri; Greeshma Thrivikraman; Cristiane M França; Nelson Monteiro; Victor Tran; Jack Ferracane; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 7.  Personalized scaffolding technologies for alveolar bone regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Ning Yu; Trang Nguyen; Young D Cho; Nolan M Kavanagh; Iya Ghassib; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials.

Authors:  Anthony Tahayeri; MaryCatherine Morgan; Ana P Fugolin; Despoina Bompolaki; Avathamsa Athirasala; Carmem S Pfeifer; Jack L Ferracane; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 9.  3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Ethan L Nyberg; Ashley L Farris; Ben P Hung; Miguel Dias; Juan R Garcia; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Advanced Scaffolds for Dental Pulp and Periodontal Regeneration.

Authors:  Marco C Bottino; Divya Pankajakshan; Jacques E Nör
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.