Literature DB >> 26123534

The Mouse Genomes Project: a repository of inbred laboratory mouse strain genomes.

David J Adams1, Anthony G Doran2, Jingtao Lilue3, Thomas M Keane4.   

Abstract

The Mouse Genomes Project was initiated in 2009 with the goal of using next-generation sequencing technologies to catalogue molecular variation in the common laboratory mouse strains, and a selected set of wild-derived inbred strains. The initial sequencing and survey of sequence variation in 17 inbred strains was completed in 2011 and included comprehensive catalogue of single nucleotide polymorphisms, short insertion/deletions, larger structural variants including their fine scale architecture and landscape of transposable element variation, and genomic sites subject to post-transcriptional alteration of RNA. From this beginning, the resource has expanded significantly to include 36 fully sequenced inbred laboratory mouse strains, a refined and updated data processing pipeline, and new variation querying and data visualisation tools which are available on the project's website ( http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/mouse/genomes/ ). The focus of the project is now the completion of de novo assembled chromosome sequences and strain-specific gene structures for the core strains. We discuss how the assembled chromosomes will power comparative analysis, data access tools and future directions of mouse genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26123534     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-015-9579-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  43 in total

Review 1.  Splicing for alternative structures of Cav1.2 Ca2+ channels in cardiac and smooth muscles.

Authors:  Ping Liao; Tan Fong Yong; Mui Cheng Liang; David T Yue; Tuck Wah Soong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores.

Authors:  Heng Li; Jue Ruan; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Limited RNA editing in exons of mouse liver and adipose.

Authors:  Sandrine Lagarrigue; Farhad Hormozdiari; Lisa J Martin; Frédéric Lecerf; Yehudit Hasin; Christoph Rau; Raffi Hagopian; Yu Xiao; Jun Yan; Thomas A Drake; Anatole Ghazalpour; Eleazar Eskin; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A novel form of tissue-specific RNA processing produces apolipoprotein-B48 in intestine.

Authors:  L M Powell; S C Wallis; R J Pease; Y H Edwards; T J Knott; J Scott
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  High levels of RNA-editing site conservation amongst 15 laboratory mouse strains.

Authors:  Petr Danecek; Christoffer Nellåker; Rebecca E McIntyre; Jorge E Buendia-Buendia; Suzannah Bumpstead; Chris P Ponting; Jonathan Flint; Richard Durbin; Thomas M Keane; David J Adams
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Canonical A-to-I and C-to-U RNA editing is enriched at 3'UTRs and microRNA target sites in multiple mouse tissues.

Authors:  Tongjun Gu; Frank W Buaas; Allen K Simons; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; Robert E Braun; Matthew A Hibbs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dalliance: interactive genome viewing on the web.

Authors:  Thomas A Down; Matias Piipari; Tim J P Hubbard
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Deep short-read sequencing of chromosome 17 from the mouse strains A/J and CAST/Ei identifies significant germline variation and candidate genes that regulate liver triglyceride levels.

Authors:  Ian Sudbery; Jim Stalker; Jared T Simpson; Thomas Keane; Alistair G Rust; Matthew E Hurles; Klaudia Walter; Dee Lynch; Lydia Teboul; Steve D Brown; Heng Li; Zemin Ning; Joseph H Nadeau; Colleen M Croniger; Richard Durbin; David J Adams
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  A comprehensive evaluation of alignment algorithms in the context of RNA-seq.

Authors:  Robert Lindner; Caroline C Friedel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamic instability of the major urinary protein gene family revealed by genomic and phenotypic comparisons between C57 and 129 strain mice.

Authors:  Jonathan M Mudge; Stuart D Armstrong; Karen McLaren; Robert J Beynon; Jane L Hurst; Christine Nicholson; Duncan H Robertson; Laurens G Wilming; Jennifer L Harrow
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  40 in total

1.  A mutation in Ccdc39 causes neonatal hydrocephalus with abnormal motile cilia development in mice.

Authors:  Zakia Abdelhamed; Shawn M Vuong; Lauren Hill; Crystal Shula; Andrew Timms; David Beier; Kenneth Campbell; Francesco T Mangano; Rolf W Stottmann; June Goto
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Fishing forward and reverse: Advances in zebrafish phenomics.

Authors:  Ricardo Fuentes; Joaquín Letelier; Benjamin Tajer; Leonardo E Valdivia; Mary C Mullins
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 3.  Incorporating population-level genetic variability within laboratory models in toxicology: From the individual to the population.

Authors:  Peter Dornbos; John J LaPres
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 4.  The state of play in higher eukaryote gene annotation.

Authors:  Jonathan M Mudge; Jennifer Harrow
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Polymerase-mediated ultramutagenesis in mice produces diverse cancers with high mutational load.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Li; Ileana Cuevas; Musi Zhang; Changzheng Lu; Md Maksudul Alam; Yang-Xin Fu; M James You; Esra A Akbay; He Zhang; Diego H Castrillon
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Systems Genetic Analysis in GeneNetwork.org.

Authors:  Clarissa C Parker; Price E Dickson; Vivek M Philip; Mary Thomas; Elissa J Chesler
Journal:  Curr Protoc Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-10

7.  A PoleP286R mouse model of endometrial cancer recapitulates high mutational burden and immunotherapy response.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Li; Changzheng Lu; He Zhang; Qing Hu; Junqiu Zhang; Ileana C Cuevas; Subhransu S Sahoo; Mitzi Aguilar; Elizabeth G Maurais; Shanrong Zhang; Xiaojing Wang; Esra A Akbay; Guo-Min Li; Bo Li; Prasad Koduru; Peter Ly; Yang-Xin Fu; Diego H Castrillon
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-07-23

8.  Identifying cis Elements for Spatiotemporal Control of Mammalian DNA Replication.

Authors:  Jiao Sima; Abhijit Chakraborty; Vishnu Dileep; Marco Michalski; Kyle N Klein; Nicolas P Holcomb; Jesse L Turner; Michelle T Paulsen; Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia; Claudia Trevilla-Garcia; Daniel A Bartlett; Peiyao A Zhao; Brian K Washburn; Elphège P Nora; Katerina Kraft; Stefan Mundlos; Benoit G Bruneau; Mats Ljungman; Peter Fraser; Ferhat Ay; David M Gilbert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Unexpected mutations were expected and unrelated to CRISPR-Cas9 activity.

Authors:  Lluis Montoliu; C Bruce A Whitelaw
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Deep short-read sequencing of chromosome 17 from the mouse strains A/J and CAST/Ei identifies significant germline variation and candidate genes that regulate liver triglyceride levels.

Authors:  Ian Sudbery; Jim Stalker; Jared T Simpson; Thomas Keane; Alistair G Rust; Matthew E Hurles; Klaudia Walter; Dee Lynch; Lydia Teboul; Steve D Brown; Heng Li; Zemin Ning; Joseph H Nadeau; Colleen M Croniger; Richard Durbin; David J Adams
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.