Literature DB >> 26123329

Raising the quality of hernia care: Is there a need?

Adrian E Park1, Hamid Reza Zahiri, Carla M Pugh, Melina Vassiliou, Guy Voeller.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With a focus on raising the quality of hernia care through creation of educational programs, SAGES formed the Hernia Task Force (HTF). This study used needs assessment survey to target opportunities for improving surgical training and thus patient outcomes and experience.
METHODS: This qualitative study included structured interviews and online surveys of key stakeholders: HTF members, surgeons, nurses, patients, hospital administrators, healthcare payers and medical suppliers. Questions included perceptions of recurrence and complication rates, their etiologies, perceived deficits in current hernia care and the most effective and training modalities.
RESULTS: A total of 841 participants included 665 surgeons, 66 patient care team members, 12 hospital administrators and 14 medical supply providers. Assessment of technical approach revealed that nearly 26 % of surgeons apply the same, limited range of techniques to all patients without evaluation of patient-specific factors. The majority (71 %) of surgeon respondents related hernia recurrence rates nearing 25 % or more. HTF members implicated surgeon factors (deficits in knowledge/technique, etc.) as primary determinants of recurrences, whereas nurses, medical supply providers and hospital administrators implicated patient health factors. Surgeons preferred attending conferences (82 %), reading periodicals/publications (71 %), watching videos (59 %) and communicating with peers (57 %) for learning and skill improvement. Topics of the greatest interest were advanced techniques for hernia repairs (71 %), preoperative and intraoperative decision making (56 %) and patient outcomes (64 %). Eighty-six percent of nurses felt that there was room for improvement in hernia patient safety and teamwork in the OR. Only 24 % believed that the patients had adequate preoperative education.
CONCLUSIONS: Major reported deficits in hernia care include: lack of standardization in training and care, "one size fits all" technical approach and inadequate patient follow-up/outcome measures. There is a need for a comprehensive, flexible and tailored educational program to equip surgeons and their teams to raise the quality of hernia care and bring greater value to their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26123329     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4309-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  45 in total

1.  Surgical management of inguinal hernia: retrospective cohort study in southeastern Scotland, 1985-2001.

Authors:  H D E Atkinson; S G Nicol; S Purkayastha; S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-16

Review 2.  Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Kaul; Susan Hutfless; Hamilton Le; Senan A Hamed; Kevin Tymitz; Hien Nguyen; Michael R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Differences in nurse and surgeon perceptions of teamwork: implications for use of a briefing checklist in the OR.

Authors:  Brian T Carney; Priscilla West; Julia Neily; Peter D Mills; James P Bagian
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.676

4.  Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  C Tanphiphat; T Tanprayoon; C Sangsubhan; K Chatamra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Postoperative surgical site infections after ventral/incisional hernia repair: a comparison of open and laparoscopic outcomes.

Authors:  Christodoulos Kaoutzanis; Stefan W Leichtle; Nicolas J Mouawad; Kathleen B Welch; Richard M Lampman; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A W Robbins
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  H Pokorny; A Klingler; T Schmid; R Fortelny; C Hollinsky; R Kawji; E Steiner; H Pernthaler; R Függer; M Scheyer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data.

Authors:  A M Grant
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Arne S Eklund; Agneta K Montgomery; Ib C Rasmussen; Rune P Sandbue; Leif A Bergkvist; Claes R Rudberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development of a standardized curriculum concept for continuing training in hernia surgery: German Hernia School.

Authors:  R Lorenz; B Stechemesser; W Reinpold; R Fortelny; F Mayer; W Schröder; F Köckerling
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Nursing Project Management to Reduce the Operating Room Infection.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Chen; Xiaodao Han; Yongjie Xu; Weihua Li
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.429

3.  Congenital hernias and hydrocele: Importance of age.

Authors:  Musa Ibrahim
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.