BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: Episodes of left atrial (LA) pressure increase predispose to atrial fibrillation (AF). The adaptation of LA mechanical function and electrophysiology to pressure elevation in healthy adults, and in patients with AF, is largely unknown. METHODS: Eleven patients with left-sided accessory pathway (controls) and 16 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing catheter ablation were studied. LA pressure (LAP) was recorded through transseptal catheterization, while speckle tracking-derived peak LA longitudinal strain (PALS) was measured using transthoracic echocardiography. Stiffness index (SI) was calculated as mean LAP/PALS. Effective refractory period (ERP) of the LA was determined during simultaneous atrioventricular (AV) pacing and during atrial pacing. RESULTS: At baseline, AF patients had higher LA pressure (mean LAP 8.3 ± 4.7 vs. 5.1 ± 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.048), reduced LA mechanical function (PALS 15.1 ± 5.1 vs. 21.6 ± 6.2 %, p = 0.006, SI 0.69 ± 0.75 vs. 0.28 ± 0.22, p = 0.015), and longer LA ERP (242.3 ± 33.4 vs. 211.7 ± 15.6 ms, p = 0.017). Mean LAP was increased to the same extent by AV pacing in controls and AF patients (mean change 12.6 ± 7.4 vs. 12.6 ± 7.5 mmHg, p = 0.980). At the same time PALS decreased (from 15.1 ± 5.1 to 11.6 ± 3.3 %, p = 0.008), SI increased (from 0.69 ± 0.75 to 1.29 ± 1.17, p < 0.001) and ERP shortened (from 242.3 ± 33.4 to 215.9 ± 26.3 ms, p = 0.003) in AF patients, while they remained unchanged in controls. CONCLUSIONS: The stiffened LA in patients with AF responds to acute pressure elevation with an exaggerated increase in wall tension and decrease in ERP, which is not seen in the normal LA. This may underlie the propensity for AF during episodes of atrial stretch in these patients.
BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: Episodes of left atrial (LA) pressure increase predispose to atrial fibrillation (AF). The adaptation of LA mechanical function and electrophysiology to pressure elevation in healthy adults, and in patients with AF, is largely unknown. METHODS: Eleven patients with left-sided accessory pathway (controls) and 16 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing catheter ablation were studied. LA pressure (LAP) was recorded through transseptal catheterization, while speckle tracking-derived peak LA longitudinal strain (PALS) was measured using transthoracic echocardiography. Stiffness index (SI) was calculated as mean LAP/PALS. Effective refractory period (ERP) of the LA was determined during simultaneous atrioventricular (AV) pacing and during atrial pacing. RESULTS: At baseline, AF patients had higher LA pressure (mean LAP 8.3 ± 4.7 vs. 5.1 ± 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.048), reduced LA mechanical function (PALS 15.1 ± 5.1 vs. 21.6 ± 6.2 %, p = 0.006, SI 0.69 ± 0.75 vs. 0.28 ± 0.22, p = 0.015), and longer LA ERP (242.3 ± 33.4 vs. 211.7 ± 15.6 ms, p = 0.017). Mean LAP was increased to the same extent by AV pacing in controls and AF patients (mean change 12.6 ± 7.4 vs. 12.6 ± 7.5 mmHg, p = 0.980). At the same time PALS decreased (from 15.1 ± 5.1 to 11.6 ± 3.3 %, p = 0.008), SI increased (from 0.69 ± 0.75 to 1.29 ± 1.17, p < 0.001) and ERP shortened (from 242.3 ± 33.4 to 215.9 ± 26.3 ms, p = 0.003) in AF patients, while they remained unchanged in controls. CONCLUSIONS: The stiffened LA in patients with AF responds to acute pressure elevation with an exaggerated increase in wall tension and decrease in ERP, which is not seen in the normal LA. This may underlie the propensity for AF during episodes of atrial stretch in these patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atrial fibrillation; Left atrial pressure; Left atrial strain; Mechanoelectric feedback
Authors: Victor Mor-Avi; Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Marek Belohlavek; Nuno Miguel Cardim; Genevieve Derumeaux; Maurizio Galderisi; Thomas Marwick; Sherif F Nagueh; Partho P Sengupta; Rosa Sicari; Otto A Smiseth; Beverly Smulevitz; Masaaki Takeuchi; James D Thomas; Mani Vannan; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr Date: 2011-03
Authors: M Efremidis; A Sideris; E Prappa; G Filippatos; G Fillipatos; D Athanasias; D Kardara; I Sioras; F Kardaras Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Suman S Kuppahally; Nazem Akoum; Nathan S Burgon; Troy J Badger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Sathya Vijayakumar; Swati N Rao; Joshua Blauer; Eric N Fish; Edward V R Dibella; Rob S Macleod; Christopher McGann; Sheldon E Litwin; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Amir Y Shaikh; Abhishek Maan; Umar A Khan; Gerard P Aurigemma; Jeffrey C Hill; Jennifer L Kane; Dennis A Tighe; Eric Mick; David D McManus Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Christoph M Augustin; Thomas E Fastl; Aurel Neic; Chiara Bellini; John Whitaker; Ronak Rajani; Mark D O'Neill; Martin J Bishop; Gernot Plank; Steven A Niederer Journal: Biomech Model Mechanobiol Date: 2019-12-04