Literature DB >> 26122956

Cost consequences due to reduced ulcer healing times - analyses based on the Swedish Registry of Ulcer Treatment.

Rut F Öien1,2, Henrik Forssell3,4, Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall5.   

Abstract

Resource use and costs for topical treatment of hard-to-heal ulcers based on data from the Swedish Registry of Ulcer Treatment (RUT) were analysed in patients recorded in RUT as having healed between 2009 and 2012, in order to estimate potential cost savings from reductions in frequency of dressing changes and healing times. RUT is used to capture areas of improvement in ulcer care and to enable structured wound management by registering patients with hard-to-heal leg, foot and pressure ulcers. Patients included in the registry are treated in primary care, community care, private care, and inpatient hospital care. Cost calculations were based on resource use data on healing time and frequency of dressing changes in Swedish patients with hard-to-heal ulcers who healed between 2009 and 2012. Per-patient treatment costs decreased from SEK38 223 in 2009 to SEK20 496 in 2012, mainly because of shorter healing times. Frequency of dressing changes was essentially the same during these years, varying from 1·4 to 1·6 per week. The total healing time was reduced by 38%. Treatment costs for the management of hard-to-heal ulcers can be reduced with well-developed treatment strategies resulting in shortened healing times as shown in RUT.
© 2015 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compression therapy; Cost savings; Dressing material; Hard-to-heal leg, foot and pressure ulcers; Structured wound management

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26122956      PMCID: PMC7949600          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  15 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C J Morrell; S J Walters; S Dixon; K A Collins; L M Brereton; J Peters; C G Brooker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-16

2.  [Treatment of venous leg ulcers is costly for the health care and the society. The value of preventive measures should be further investigated according to a study].

Authors:  Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall; Jonas Hjelmgren
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2005 Oct 17-23

3.  Accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of leg ulcers reduce prevalence, care time and costs.

Authors:  R F Oien; G Ragnarson Tennvall
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.072

4.  Annual costs of treatment for venous leg ulcers in Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall; Jonas Hjelmgren
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 5.  Comparison of outcomes in patients with venous leg ulcers treated with compression therapy alone versus combination of surgery and compression therapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Magali Rezende de Carvalho
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.741

6.  Diabetic foot ulcers in a multidisciplinary setting. An economic analysis of primary healing and healing with amputation.

Authors:  J Apelqvist; G Ragnarson-Tennvall; U Persson; J Larsson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Clinical predictors of leg ulcer healing.

Authors:  C J Moffatt; D C Doherty; R Smithdale; P J Franks
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Assessing quality of life in patients with hard-to-heal ulcers using the EQ-5D questionnaire.

Authors:  R F Oien; N Akesson; H Forssell
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  [Treatment of venous leg ulcers can be better and cheaper. Annual costs calculation based on an inquiry study].

Authors:  Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall; Karin Andersson; Mats Bjellerup; Jonas Hjelmgren; Rut Oien
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2004-04-22

10.  Ulcer healing time and antibiotic treatment before and after the introduction of the Registry of Ulcer Treatment: an improvement project in a national quality registry in Sweden.

Authors:  Rut F Oien; Henrik W Forssell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessing and comparing the quality of wound centres: a literature review and benchmarking pilot.

Authors:  Lotte Pruim; Anke Wind; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Wound management for the 21st century: combining effectiveness and efficiency.

Authors:  Christina Lindholm; Richard Searle
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  District nurses' experiences of caring for leg ulcers in accordance with clinical guidelines: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Annica Lagerin; Ingrid Hylander; Lena Törnkvist
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2017-12

4.  Comparing video consultation with inperson assessment for Swedish patients with hard-to-heal ulcers: registry-based studies of healing time and of waiting time.

Authors:  Hanna L Wickström; Rut Frank Öien; Cecilia Fagerström; Peter Anderberg; Ulf Jakobsson; Patrik J Midlöv
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Still engaged - healthcare staff's engagement when introducing a new eHealth solution for wound management: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Cecilia Fagerström; Hanna Wickström; Hanna Tuvesson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Development of a model to predict closure of chronic wounds in Germany: Claims data analysis.

Authors:  Kristina Hagenström; Kerstin Protz; Jana Petersen; Matthias Augustin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.