Literature DB >> 26122113

Requirement of POL3 and POL4 on non-homologous and microhomology-mediated end joining in rad50/xrs2 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Alvaro Galli, Cecilia Y Chan1, Liubov Parfenova1, Tiziana Cervelli, Robert H Schiestl1.   

Abstract

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) directly joins two broken DNA ends without sequence homology. A distinct pathway called microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) relies on a few base pairs of homology between the recombined DNA. The majority of DNA double-strand breaks caused by endogenous oxygen species or ionizing radiation contain damaged bases that hinder direct religation. End processing is required to remove mismatched nucleotides and fill in gaps during end joining of incompatible ends. POL3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes polymerase δ that is required for DNA replication and other DNA repair processes. Our previous results have shown that POL3 is involved in gap filling at 3' overhangs in POL4-independent NHEJ. Here, we studied the epistatic interaction between POL3, RAD50, XRS2 and POL4 in NHEJ using a plasmid-based endjoining assay in yeast. We demonstrated that either rad50 or xrs2 mutation is epistatic for end joining of compatible ends in the rad50 pol3-t or xrs2 pol3-t double mutants. However, the pol3-t and rad50 or pol3-t and xrs2 mutants caused an additive decrease in the end-joining efficiency of incompatible ends, suggesting that POL3 and RAD50 or POL3 and XRS2 exhibit independent functions in NHEJ. In the rad50 pol4 mutant, end joining of incompatible ends was not detected. In the rad50 or xrs2 mutants, NHEJ events did not contain any microhomology at the rejoined junctions. The pol3-t mutation restored MMEJ in the rad50 or xrs2 mutant backgrounds. Moreover, we demonstrated that NHEJ of incompatible ends required RAD50 and POL4 more than POL3. In conclusion, POL3 and POL4 have differential functions in NHEJ, independent of the RAD50-mediated repair pathway.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26122113      PMCID: PMC4757936          DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gev046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  70 in total

1.  Genetic factors affecting the impact of DNA polymerase delta proofreading activity on mutation avoidance in yeast.

Authors:  H T Tran; N P Degtyareva; D A Gordenin; M A Resnick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  DNA end joining by the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I.

Authors:  J S King; C F Fairley; W F Morgan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-08-23       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  S J Boulton; S P Jackson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Efficient processing of DNA ends during yeast nonhomologous end joining. Evidence for a DNA polymerase beta (Pol4)-dependent pathway.

Authors:  T E Wilson; M R Lieber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Ku-dependent and Ku-independent end-joining pathways lead to chromosomal rearrangements during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Abram Gabriel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants.

Authors:  C Chen; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  Non-homologous end-joining factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zuzana Dudásová; Andrej Dudás; Miroslav Chovanec
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 16.408

8.  Double-strand break repair in yeast requires both leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases.

Authors:  A M Holmes; J E Haber
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-02-05       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  A physical and functional interaction between yeast Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1 links DNA synthesis and ligation in nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Hui-Min Tseng; Alan E Tomkinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Processing and joining of DNA ends coordinated by interactions among Dnl4/Lif1, Pol4, and FEN-1.

Authors:  Hui-Min Tseng; Alan E Tomkinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Consider the workhorse: Nonhomologous end-joining in budding yeast.

Authors:  Charlene H Emerson; Alison A Bertuch
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.626

2.  Polymerase δ promotes chromosomal rearrangements and imprecise double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Jacob V Layer; Lydie Debaize; Alexandria Van Scoyk; Nealia C House; Alexander J Brown; Yunpeng Liu; Kristen E Stevenson; Michael Hemann; Steven A Roberts; Brendan D Price; David M Weinstock; Tovah A Day
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rationally designed perturbation factor drives evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for industrial application.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Chunfeng Liu; Chengtuo Niu; Jinjing Wang; Feiyun Zheng; Yongxian Li; Qi Li
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  High-temperature ethanol fermentation from pineapple waste hydrolysate and gene expression analysis of thermotolerant yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Huynh Xuan Phong; Preekamol Klanrit; Ngo Thi Phuong Dung; Sudarat Thanonkeo; Mamoru Yamada; Pornthap Thanonkeo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Overhang polarity of chromosomal double-strand breaks impacts kinetics and fidelity of yeast non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Zhuobin Liang; Sham Sunder; Sivakumar Nallasivam; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  CRISPR/Cas-based precision genome editing via microhomology-mediated end joining.

Authors:  Tien Van Vu; Duong Thi Hai Doan; Jihae Kim; Yeon Woo Sung; Mil Thi Tran; Young Jong Song; Swati Das; Jae-Yean Kim
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 9.803

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.