Literature DB >> 26121951

Against Genetic Tests for Athletic Talent: The Primacy of the Phenotype.

Sigmund Loland1.   

Abstract

New insights into the genetics of sport performance lead to new areas of application. One area is the use of genetic tests to identify athletic talent. Athletic performances involve a high number of complex phenotypical traits. Based on the ACCE model (review of Analytic and Clinical validity, Clinical utility, and Ethical, legal and social implications), a critique is offered of the lack of validity and predictive power of genetic tests for talent. Based on the ideal of children's right to an open future, a moral argument is given against such tests on children and young athletes. A possible role of genetic tests in sport is proposed in terms of identifying predisposition for injury. In meeting ACCE requirements, such tests could improve individualised injury prevention and increase athlete health. More generally, limitations of science are discussed in the identification of talent and in the understanding of complex human performance phenotypes. An alternative approach to talent identification is proposed in terms of ethically sensitive, systematic and evidence-based holistic observation over time of relevant phenotypical traits by experienced observers. Talent identification in sport should be based on the primacy of the phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26121951     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0352-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  16 in total

1.  Comment: genetic test available for sports performance.

Authors:  J Savulescu; B Foddy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Genetics and sports.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Conventional and genetic talent identification in sports: will recent developments trace talent?

Authors:  Sarah Breitbach; Suzan Tug; Perikles Simon
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The right to an open future concerning genetic information.

Authors:  Annelien L Bredenoord; Martine C de Vries; Hans van Delden
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Arrogance-based medicine: guidelines regarding genetic testing in children.

Authors:  Annie Janvier; Barbara Farlow
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else: incidental findings in recreational personal genomics.

Authors:  Dov Greenbaum
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 7.  Genetic testing and sports medicine ethics.

Authors:  Michael John McNamee; Arno Müller; Ivo van Hilvoorde; Søren Holm
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Genetic influence on athletic performance.

Authors:  Lisa M Guth; Stephen M Roth
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.856

9.  Bend it like Beckham! The Ethics of Genetically Testing Children for Athletic Potential.

Authors:  Silvia Camporesi
Journal:  Sport Ethics Philos       Date:  2013-04-04

10.  How can the evaluation of genetic tests be enhanced? Lessons learned from the ACCE framework and evaluating genetic tests in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Simon Sanderson; Ron Zimmern; Mark Kroese; Julian Higgins; Christine Patch; Jon Emery
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport.

Authors:  Nicole Vlahovich; Peter A Fricker; Matthew A Brown; David Hughes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  The current use, and opinions of elite athletes and support staff in relation to genetic testing in elite sport within the UK.

Authors:  Ian Varley; Seema Patel; Alun G Williams; Philip J Hennis
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.806

3.  Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children.

Authors:  Jeremy R Garrett; John D Lantos; Leslie G Biesecker; Janet E Childerhose; Wendy K Chung; Ingrid A Holm; Barbara A Koenig; Jean E McEwen; Benjamin S Wilfond; Kyle Brothers
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.822

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.