Literature DB >> 26121432

Velocity Drives Greater Power Observed During Back Squat Using Cluster Sets.

Jonathan M Oliver1, Andreas Kreutzer, Shane C Jenke, Melody D Phillips, Joel B Mitchell, Margaret T Jones.   

Abstract

This investigation compared the kinetics and kinematics of cluster sets (CLU) and traditional sets (TRD) during back squat in trained (RT) and untrained (UT) men. Twenty-four participants (RT = 12, 25 ± 1 year, 179.1 ± 2.2 cm, 84.6 ± 2.1 kg; UT = 12, 25 ± 1 year, 180.1 ± 1.8 cm, 85.4 ± 3.8 kg) performed TRD (4 × 10, 120-second rest) and CLU (4 × (2 × 5) 30 seconds between clusters; 90 seconds between sets) with 70% one repetition maximum, randomly. Kinematics and kinetics were sampled through force plate and linear position transducers. Resistance-trained produced greater overall force, velocity, and power; however, similar patterns were observed in all variables when comparing conditions. Cluster sets produced significantly greater force in isolated repetitions in sets 1-3, while consistently producing greater force due to a required reduction in load during set 4 resulting in greater total volume load (CLU, 3302.4 ± 102.7 kg; TRD, 3274.8 ± 102.8 kg). Velocity loss was lessened in CLU resulting in significantly higher velocities in sets 2 through 4. Furthermore, higher velocities were produced by CLU during later repetitions of each set. Cluster sets produced greater power output for an increasing number of repetitions in each set (set 1, 5 repetitions; sets 2 and 3, 6 repetitions; set 4, 8 repetitions), and the difference between conditions increased over subsequent sets. Time under tension increased over each set and was greater in TRD. This study demonstrates greater power output is driven by greater velocity when back squatting during CLU; therefore, velocity may be a useful measure by which to assess power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26121432     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  13 in total

1.  Strengthening the Case for Cluster Set Resistance Training in Aged and Clinical Settings: Emerging Evidence, Proposed Benefits and Suggestions.

Authors:  Christopher Latella; Carolyn Peddle-McIntyre; Lauren Marcotte; James Steele; Kristina Kendall; Ciaran M Fairman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Optimal Training Sequences to Develop Lower Body Force, Velocity, Power, and Jump Height: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  James Marshall; Chris Bishop; Anthony Turner; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Acute response to cluster sets in trained and untrained men.

Authors:  Jonathan M Oliver; Andreas Kreutzer; Shane Jenke; Melody D Phillips; Joel B Mitchell; Margaret T Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Acute Effects of Cluster and Rest Redistribution Set Structures on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Fatigue During and After Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Amador García Ramos; Eric R Helms; Michael R McGuigan; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The Effects of Set Structure Manipulation on Chronic Adaptations to Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Bas Van Hooren; Amador García Ramos; Eric R Helms; Michael R McGuigan; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Ingestion of High Molecular Weight Carbohydrate Enhances Subsequent Repeated Maximal Power: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan M Oliver; Anthony L Almada; Leighsa E Van Eck; Meena Shah; Joel B Mitchell; Margaret T Jones; Andrew R Jagim; David S Rowlands
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of Cluster Sets and Rest-Redistribution on Mechanical Responses to Back Squats in Trained Men.

Authors:  James J Tufano; Jenny A Conlon; Sophia Nimphius; Lee E Brown; Alex Petkovic; Justin Frick; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Repetition-to-Repetition Differences Using Cluster and Accentuated Eccentric Loading in the Back Squat.

Authors:  John P Wagle; Christopher B Taber; Kevin M Carroll; Aaron J Cunanan; Matt L Sams; Alexander Wetmore; Garett E Bingham; Brad H DeWeese; Kimitake Sato; Charles A Stuart; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-08

10.  Cluster sets vs. traditional sets: Levelling out the playing field using a power-based threshold.

Authors:  James J Tufano; Matej Halaj; Tomas Kampmiller; Adrian Novosad; Gabriel Buzgo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.