Literature DB >> 26121378

Transfemoral versus Transapical Aortic Implantation for Aortic Stenosis Based on No Significant Difference in Logistic EuroSCORE: A Meta-Analysis.

Zhifang Liu1, Renliang He1, Canghao Wu1, Yu Xia1.   

Abstract

Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has gained increasing acceptance for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). The present meta-analysis was performed to assess if the transapical (TA) approach has any benefit in reduction of mortality and complications relative to the transfemoral (TF) approach for patients with AS. Methods All relevant studies comparing TF-TAVI and TA-TAVI from January 2002 to November 2013 were retrieved from Medline and Embase databases. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the difference between two groups. Heterogeneity assumption was assessed by an I (2) test. The random-effect model or fixed-effect model was used to estimate summary effect based on I (2) test. Results Nine studies conformed to the predefined criteria, including 666 patients in the TF-TAVI group and 457 patients in the TA-TAVI group. No difference was found in all-cause mortality at 30 days and beyond 1 year between the two groups (30 days: 9.2% versus 11.4%; RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.11; p = 0.14 and beyond 1 year: RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.56; p = 0.86). There was a trend toward increased incidence of stroke in patients in the TF-TAVI group (4.7% versus 2.6%; RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.75 to 3.58; p = 0.21), and the incidence of vascular complication and postoperative heart block were significantly increased in patients having TF-TAVI (vascular complications: 14.7% versus 7.1%; RR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.61; p = 0.01 and heart block: 13.4% versus 4.6%; RR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.10 to 5.83; p = 0.03). Additionally, more patients in the TF-TAVI group required permanent pacemaker relative to the TA-TAVI group (10.8% versus 3.4%; RR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.41 to 5.32; p = 0.003). Conclusions Among patients with AS with no significant difference in logistic EuroSCORE, TA-TAVI has a lower risk of vascular complication and postoperative heart block but a similar incidence of stroke and mortality compared with TF-TAVI. Accordingly, TA approach is a promising and feasible option for the patients with severe AS. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26121378     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0171-6425            Impact factor:   1.827


  3 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation at a high-volume center: the Bad Rothenfelde experience.

Authors:  Marek Kowalski; Cornelia Deutsch; Steffen Hofmann; Norbert Franz; Michael Billion; Abbas Ferdosi; Peter Bramlage; Guram Imnadze; Henning Warnecke
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 2.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Tsigkas Grigorios; Despotopoulos Stefanos; Makris Athanasios; Koniari Ioanna; Armylagos Stylianos; Davlouros Periklis; Hahalis George
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Neutrophil Counts, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) Predict Mortality after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  Tomasz Urbanowicz; Michał Michalak; Anna Olasińska-Wiśniewska; Michał Rodzki; Anna Witkowska; Aleksandra Gąsecka; Piotr Buczkowski; Bartłomiej Perek; Marek Jemielity
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 6.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.