Literature DB >> 26121228

Solid Cancer Incidence in the Techa River Incidence Cohort: 1956-2007.

F G Davis1, K L Yu2, D Preston3, S Epifanova2, M Degteva4, A V Akleyev5.   

Abstract

Previously reported studies of the Techa River Cohort have established associations between radiation dose and the occurrence of solid cancers and leukemia (non-CLL) that appear to be linear in dose response. These analyses include 17,435 cohort members alive and not known to have had cancer prior to January 1, 1956 who lived in areas near the river or Chelyabinsk City at some time between 1956 and the end of 2007, utilized individualized dose estimates computed using the Techa River Dosimetry System 2009 and included five more years of follow-up. The median and mean dose estimates based on these doses are consistently higher than those based on earlier Techa River Dosimetry System 2000 dose estimates. This article includes new site-specific cancer risk estimates and risk estimates adjusted for available information on smoking. There is a statistically significant (P = 0.02) linear trend in the smoking-adjusted all-solid cancer incidence risks with an excess relative risk (ERR) after exposure to 100 mGy of 0.077 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.013-0.15. Examination of site-specific risks revealed statistically significant radiation dose effects only for cancers of the esophagus and uterus with an ERR per 100 mGy estimates in excess of 0.10. Esophageal cancer risk estimates were modified by ethnicity and sex, but not smoking. While the solid cancer rates are attenuated when esophageal cancer is removed (ERR = 0.063 per 100 mGy), a dose-response relationship is present and it remains likely that radiation exposure has increased the risks for most solid cancers in the cohort despite the lack of power to detect statistically significant risks for specific sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26121228     DOI: 10.1667/RR14023.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  20 in total

1.  HIGHLIGHTS OF THE RUSSIAN HEALTH STUDIES PROGRAM AND UPDATED RESEARCH FINDINGS.

Authors:  Barrett N Fountos
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors).

Authors:  Bill Sacks; Gregory Meyerson; Jeffry A Siegel
Journal:  Biol Theory       Date:  2016-06-17

Review 3.  Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.

Authors:  Ethel S Gilbert; Mark P Little; Dale L Preston; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 4.  Dose limits for occupational exposure to ionising radiation and genotoxic carcinogens: a German perspective.

Authors:  Werner Rühm; Joachim Breckow; Günter Dietze; Anna Friedl; Rüdiger Greinert; Peter Jacob; Stephan Kistinger; Rolf Michel; Wolfgang-Ulrich Müller; Heinz Otten; Christian Streffer; Wolfgang Weiss
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Solid cancer incidence among Chinese medical diagnostic x-ray workers, 1950-1995: Estimation of radiation-related risks.

Authors:  Zhijuan Sun; Peter D Inskip; Jixian Wang; Deukwoo Kwon; Yongcheng Zhao; Liangan Zhang; Qin Wang; Saijun Fan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Studies of radiation health effects inform EPA actions.

Authors:  David Pawel; Michael Boyd
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.394

7.  External dose reconstruction for the former village of Metlino (Techa River, Russia) based on environmental surveys, luminescence measurements, and radiation transport modelling.

Authors:  M M Hiller; C Woda; N G Bougrov; M O Degteva; O Ivanov; A Ulanovsky; S Romanov
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Probability Distribution of Dose and Dose-Rate Effectiveness Factor for use in Estimating Risks of Solid Cancers From Exposure to Low-Let Radiation.

Authors:  David C Kocher; A Iulian Apostoaei; F Owen Hoffman; John R Trabalka
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 9.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

10.  Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Robert D Daniels; Elisabeth Cardis; Harry M Cullings; Ethel Gilbert; Michael Hauptmann; Gerald Kendall; Dominique Laurier; Martha S Linet; Mark P Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; David B Richardson; Daniel Stram; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.