Literature DB >> 26121121

Hepatic Steatosis: Assessment with Acoustic Structure Quantification of US Imaging.

Jee-Young Son1, Jae Young Lee1, Nam-Joon Yi1, Kwang-Woong Lee1, Kyung-Suk Suh1, Kwang Gi Kim1, Jeong Min Lee1, Joon Koo Han1, Byung Ihn Choi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of acoustic structure quantification (ASQ) for the assessment of hepatic steatosis by using hydrogen 1 ((1)H) magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy as the reference standard and to compare ASQ with hepatorenal ratio.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by an institutional review board, and informed written consent was obtained from all participants. ASQ and MR spectroscopy were performed in 89 participants (mean age, 41.48 years ± 14.16; 35 men, 54 women) without history of chronic liver disease. Obtained were focal disturbance (FD) ratio by using ASQ, hepatic fat fraction (HFF) by using MR spectroscopy, and hepatorenal ratio by using a histogram. Correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, and receiver operating curve analyses were performed.
RESULTS: FD ratio measured with ASQ had a strong linear correlation with HFF measured with MR spectroscopy after logarithmic transformation of both variables (r = -0.87; P < .001). By using HFF of 5.79% as a cutoff value of 10% hepatic steatosis, 29 of 89 participants (32.6%) were categorized into the group with hepatic steatosis of 10% or greater (mean HFF, 13.18% ± 4.89). The area under curve of the FD ratio for diagnosing hepatic steatosis 10% or greater was 0.959 (95% confidence interval: 0.895, 0.990) with sensitivity of 86.2% (95% confidence interval: 68.3%, 96.0%) and specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval: 94.0%, 100.0%) by using a cutoff value of 0.1; the area under curve and specificity of the FD ratio were significantly higher than those of the hepatorenal ratio (respectively, 0.772 and 73.3%; respective P values, .001 and <.001).
CONCLUSION: This pilot study in a cohort of patients with hepatic steatosis without other parenchymal disease suggested ASQ may be valuable for the quantification of hepatic steatosis and detection of hepatic steatosis 10% or greater in living liver donors. © RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26121121     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015141779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the Non-tumorous Liver: Implications for Patient Management and Surgical Therapy.

Authors:  Pallavi Pandey; Ankur Pandey; Mary Dillhoff; Carl Schmidt; Ihab R Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Accuracy of Liver Fat Quantification With Advanced CT, MRI, and Ultrasound Techniques: Prospective Comparison With MR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Perry J Pickhardt; Mark A Kliewer; Diego Hernando; Guang-Hong Chen; James A Zagzebski; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Hepatic steatosis assessment using ultrasound homodyned-K parametric imaging: the effects of estimators.

Authors:  Zhuhuang Zhou; Qiyu Zhang; Weiwei Wu; Ying-Hsiu Lin; Dar-In Tai; Jeng-Hwei Tseng; Yi-Ru Lin; Shuicai Wu; Po-Hsiang Tsui
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-12

4.  Evaluation of muscular changes by ultrasound Nakagami imaging in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Wen-Chin Weng; Po-Hsiang Tsui; Chia-Wei Lin; Chun-Hao Lu; Chun-Yen Lin; Jeng-Yi Shieh; Frank Leigh Lu; Ting-Wei Ee; Kuan-Wen Wu; Wang-Tso Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Reproducibility of ultrasound attenuation imaging for the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Jeongin Yoo; Jeong Min Lee; Ijin Joo; Dong Ho Lee; Jeong Hee Yoon; Hyo-Jin Kang; Su Joa Ahn
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2019-08-12

6.  Performance Evaluations on Using Entropy of Ultrasound Log-Compressed Envelope Images for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: An In Vivo Animal Study.

Authors:  Jui Fang; Ning-Fang Chang; Po-Hsiang Tsui
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Acoustic structure quantification by using ultrasound Nakagami imaging for assessing liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Po-Hsiang Tsui; Ming-Chih Ho; Dar-In Tai; Ying-Hsiu Lin; Chiao-Yin Wang; Hsiang-Yang Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Imaging evaluation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: focused on quantification.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-10

9.  Effect of ultrasound frequency on the Nakagami statistics of human liver tissues.

Authors:  Po-Hsiang Tsui; Zhuhuang Zhou; Ying-Hsiu Lin; Chieh-Ming Hung; Shih-Jou Chung; Yung-Liang Wan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Quantitative ultrasound approaches for diagnosis and monitoring hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Amir M Pirmoazen; Aman Khurana; Ahmed El Kaffas; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.