Literature DB >> 26119459

Experimental application of ultrafast imaging to spectral tissue characterization.

Julian Garcia-Duitama1, Boris Chayer2, Aiguo Han3, Damien Garcia4, Michael L Oelze3, Guy Cloutier5.   

Abstract

Ultrasound ultrafast imaging (UI) allows acquisition of thousands of frames per second with a sustained image quality at any depth in the field of view. Therefore, it would be ideally suited to obtain good statistical sampling of fast-moving tissues using spectral-based techniques to derive the backscatter coefficient (BSC) and associated quantitative parameters. In UI, an image is formed by insonifying the medium with plane waves steered at different angles, beamforming them and compounding the resulting radiofrequency images. We aimed at validating, experimentally, the effect of these beamforming protocols on the BSC, under both isotropic and anisotropic conditions. Using UI techniques with a linear array transducer (5-14 MHz), we estimated the BSCs of tissue-mimicking phantoms and flowing porcine blood at depths up to 35 mm with a frame rate reaching 514 Hz. UI-based data were compared with those obtained using single-element transducers and conventional focusing imaging. Results revealed that UI compounded images can produce valid estimates of BSCs and effective scatterer size (errors less than 2.2 ± 0.8 and 0.26 ± 0.2 dB for blood and phantom experiments, respectively). This work also describes the use of pre-compounded UI images (i.e., steered images) to assess the angular dependency of circulating red blood cells. We have concluded that UI data sets can be used for BSC spectral tissue analysis and anisotropy characterization.
Copyright © 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Backscatter coefficient; Erythrocyte aggregation; Planar reflector technique; Plane wave imaging; Quantitative ultrasound; Reference phantom technique; Spectral analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26119459     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  3 in total

1.  Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.

Authors:  Masaaki Omura; Hideyuki Hasegawa; Ryo Nagaoka; Kenji Yoshida; Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 2.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  A novel quantitative and reference-free ultrasound analysis to discriminate different concentrations of bone mineral content.

Authors:  A Sorriento; A Poliziani; A Cafarelli; G Valenza; L Ricotti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.