Literature DB >> 26118672

Tool-use-associated sound in the evolution of language.

Matz Larsson1.   

Abstract

Proponents of the motor theory of language evolution have primarily focused on the visual domain and communication through observation of movements. In the present paper, it is hypothesized that the production and perception of sound, particularly of incidental sound of locomotion (ISOL) and tool-use sound (TUS), also contributed. Human bipedalism resulted in rhythmic and more predictable ISOL. It has been proposed that this stimulated the evolution of musical abilities, auditory working memory, and abilities to produce complex vocalizations and to mimic natural sounds. Since the human brain proficiently extracts information about objects and events from the sounds they produce, TUS, and mimicry of TUS, might have achieved an iconic function. The prevalence of sound symbolism in many extant languages supports this idea. Self-produced TUS activates multimodal brain processing (motor neurons, hearing, proprioception, touch, vision), and TUS stimulates primate audiovisual mirror neurons, which is likely to stimulate the development of association chains. Tool use and auditory gestures involve motor processing of the forelimbs, which is associated with the evolution of vertebrate vocal communication. The production, perception, and mimicry of TUS may have resulted in a limited number of vocalizations or protowords that were associated with tool use. A new way to communicate about tools, especially when out of sight, would have had selective advantage. A gradual change in acoustic properties and/or meaning could have resulted in arbitrariness and an expanded repertoire of words. Humans have been increasingly exposed to TUS over millions of years, coinciding with the period during which spoken language evolved. ISOL and tool-use-related sound are worth further exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26118672     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0885-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  11 in total

Review 1.  The ideomotor recycling theory for tool use, language, and foresight.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; François Osiurak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Auditory object perception: A neurobiological model and prospective review.

Authors:  Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; James W Lewis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Early Cortical Sensitivity to Human Conspecific Mimic Voice as a Distinct Category of Natural Sound.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Jeremy Donai; Alexandra S Kadner; Molly L Layne; Andrew Forino; Sijin Wen; Si Gao; Margeaux M Gray; Alexandria J Ashraf; Gabriela N Valencia; Brandon D Smith; Stephanie K Khoo; Stephen J Gray; Norman Lass; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Susannah Engdahl; David Graham; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Hearing and orally mimicking different acoustic-semantic categories of natural sound engage distinct left hemisphere cortical regions.

Authors:  James W Lewis; Magenta J Silberman; Jeremy J Donai; Chris A Frum; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Chinese-English bilinguals show linguistic-perceptual links in the brain associating short spoken phrases with corresponding real-world natural action sounds by semantic category.

Authors:  Gabriela N Valencia; Stephanie Khoo; Ting Wong; Joseph Ta; Bob Hou; Lawrence W Barsalou; Kirk Hazen; Huey Hannah Lin; Shuo Wang; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Phonological perception by birds: budgerigars can perceive lexical stress.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Olivier Houix; Frédéric Voisin; Nicolas Misdariis; Patrick Susini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Paradox of Isochrony in the Evolution of Human Rhythm.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Guy Madison
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-06

9.  Divergent Human Cortical Regions for Processing Distinct Acoustic-Semantic Categories of Natural Sounds: Animal Action Sounds vs. Vocalizations.

Authors:  Paula J Webster; Laura M Skipper-Kallal; Chris A Frum; Hayley N Still; B Douglas Ward; James W Lewis
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Why We Should Study Multimodal Language.

Authors:  Pamela Perniss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.