Torbjörn Åkerstedt1,2, Johanna Garefelt1, Anne Richter3,4, Hugo Westerlund1, Linda L Magnusson Hanson1, Magnus Sverke3,5, Göran Kecklund1,2. 1. Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Clinical neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre (MMC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. WorkWell: Research Unit for Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, South Africa.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is limited knowledge about the prospective relationship between major work characteristics (psychosocial, physical, scheduling) and disturbed sleep. The current study sought to provide such knowledge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort, with measurements on two occasions (T1 and T2) separated by two years. SETTING: Naturalistic study, Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: There were 4,827 participants forming a representative sample of the working population. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Questionnaire data on work factors obtained on two occasions were analyzed with structural equation modeling. Competing models were compared in order to investigate temporal relationships. A reciprocal model was found to fit the data best. Sleep disturbances at T2 were predicted by higher work demands at T1 and by lower perceived stress at T1. In addition, sleep disturbances at T1 predicted subsequent higher perception of stress, higher work demands, lower degree of control, and less social support at work at T2. A cross-sectional mediation analysis showed that (higher) perceived stress mediated the relationship between (higher) work demands and sleep disturbances; however, no such association was found longitudinally. CONCLUSIONS: Higher work demands predicted disturbed sleep, whereas physical work characteristics, shift work, and overtime did not. In addition, disturbed sleep predicted subsequent higher work demands, perceived stress, less social support, and lower degree of control. The results suggest that remedial interventions against sleep disturbances should focus on psychosocial factors, and that such remedial interventions may improve the psychosocial work situation in the long run.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is limited knowledge about the prospective relationship between major work characteristics (psychosocial, physical, scheduling) and disturbed sleep. The current study sought to provide such knowledge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort, with measurements on two occasions (T1 and T2) separated by two years. SETTING: Naturalistic study, Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: There were 4,827 participants forming a representative sample of the working population. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Questionnaire data on work factors obtained on two occasions were analyzed with structural equation modeling. Competing models were compared in order to investigate temporal relationships. A reciprocal model was found to fit the data best. Sleep disturbances at T2 were predicted by higher work demands at T1 and by lower perceived stress at T1. In addition, sleep disturbances at T1 predicted subsequent higher perception of stress, higher work demands, lower degree of control, and less social support at work at T2. A cross-sectional mediation analysis showed that (higher) perceived stress mediated the relationship between (higher) work demands and sleep disturbances; however, no such association was found longitudinally. CONCLUSIONS: Higher work demands predicted disturbed sleep, whereas physical work characteristics, shift work, and overtime did not. In addition, disturbed sleep predicted subsequent higher work demands, perceived stress, less social support, and lower degree of control. The results suggest that remedial interventions against sleep disturbances should focus on psychosocial factors, and that such remedial interventions may improve the psychosocial work situation in the long run.
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Solja T Nyberg; G David Batty; Eleonor I Fransson; Katriina Heikkilä; Lars Alfredsson; Jakob B Bjorner; Marianne Borritz; Hermann Burr; Annalisa Casini; Els Clays; Dirk De Bacquer; Nico Dragano; Jane E Ferrie; Goedele A Geuskens; Marcel Goldberg; Mark Hamer; Wendela E Hooftman; Irene L Houtman; Matti Joensuu; Markus Jokela; France Kittel; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Aki Koskinen; Anne Kouvonen; Meena Kumari; Ida E H Madsen; Michael G Marmot; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Tuula Oksanen; Jaana Pentti; Reiner Rugulies; Paula Salo; Johannes Siegrist; Archana Singh-Manoux; Sakari B Suominen; Ari Väänänen; Jussi Vahtera; Marianna Virtanen; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Marie Zins; Andrew Steptoe; Töres Theorell Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Erica C Jansen; Karen E Peterson; Louise O'Brien; Shelley Hershner; Ali Boolani Journal: Behav Sleep Med Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.964
Authors: Katarina Aili; Sofia Åström-Paulsson; Ulrich Stoetzer; Magnus Svartengren; Lena Hillert Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2017-01-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Johanna Stengård; Marianna Virtanen; Constanze Leineweber; Hugo Westerlund; Hui-Xin Wang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jaana I Halonen; Tea Lallukka; Jaana Pentti; Sari Stenholm; Naja H Rod; Marianna Virtanen; Paula Salo; Mika Kivimäki; Jussi Vahtera Journal: Sleep Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 5.849