Literature DB >> 26117186

The in vivo fate of nanoparticles and nanoparticle-loaded microcapsules after oral administration in mice: Evaluation of their potential for colon-specific delivery.

Yiming Ma1, Adrian V Fuchs1, Nathan R B Boase1, Barbara E Rolfe2, Allan G A Coombes3, Kristofer J Thurecht4.   

Abstract

Anti-cancer drug loaded-nanoparticles (NPs) or encapsulation of NPs in colon-targeted delivery systems shows potential for increasing the local drug concentration in the colon leading to improved treatment of colorectal cancer. To investigate the potential of the NP-based strategies for colon-specific delivery, two formulations, free Eudragit® NPs and enteric-coated NP-loaded chitosan-hypromellose microcapsules (MCs) were fluorescently-labelled and their tissue distribution in mice after oral administration was monitored by multispectral small animal imaging. The free NPs showed a shorter transit time throughout the mouse digestive tract than the MCs, with extensive excretion of NPs in faeces at 5h. Conversely, the MCs showed complete NP release in the lower region of the mouse small intestine at 8h post-administration. Overall, the encapsulation of NPs in MCs resulted in a higher colonic NP intensity from 8h to 24h post-administration compared to the free NPs, due to a NP 'guarding' effect of MCs during their transit along mouse gastrointestinal tract which decreased NP excretion in faeces. These imaging data revealed that this widely-utilised colon-targeting MC formulation lacked site-precision for releasing its NP load in the colon, but the increased residence time of the NPs in the lower gastrointestinal tract suggests that it is still useful for localised release of chemotherapeutics, compared to NP administration alone. In addition, both formulations resided in the stomach of mice at considerable concentrations over 24h. Thus, adhesion of NP- or MC-based oral delivery systems to gastric mucosa may be problematic for colon-specific delivery of the cargo to the colon and should be carefully investigated for a full evaluation of particulate delivery systems.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal optical imaging; Chitosan–hypromellose microcapsules; Colorectal cancer; In vivo; Nanoparticles; Oral delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26117186     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  5 in total

1.  Functional Photoacoustic Imaging of Gastric Acid Secretion Using pH-Responsive Polyaniline Nanoprobes.

Authors:  Junwei Li; Hong Xiao; Soon Joon Yoon; Chengbo Liu; Drew Matsuura; Wanyi Tai; Liang Song; Matthew O'Donnell; Du Cheng; Xiaohu Gao
Journal:  Small       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 13.281

2.  Oral Drug Delivery Technologies-A Decade of Developments.

Authors:  G Kaur; M Arora; M N V Ravi Kumar
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Cell to rodent: toxicological profiling of folate grafted thiomer enveloped nanoliposomes.

Authors:  Muhammad Farhan Sohail; Hafiz Shoaib Sarwar; Ibrahim Javed; Akhtar Nadhman; Syed Zajif Hussain; Hamid Saeed; Abida Raza; Nadeem Irfan Bukhari; Irshad Hussain; Gul Shahnaz
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 4.  Enteric-Coated Strategies in Colorectal Cancer Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System.

Authors:  Nasrul Wathoni; An Ny Nguyen; Agus Rusdin; Abd Kakhar Umar; Ahmed Fouad Abdelwahab Mohammed; Keiichi Motoyama; I Made Joni; Muchtaridi Muchtaridi
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Ionic Cross-Linking as a Strategy to Modulate the Properties of Oral Mucoadhesive Microparticles Based on Polysaccharide Blends.

Authors:  Fernanda Isadora Boni; Beatriz S F Cury; Natália Noronha Ferreira; Maria Palmira Daflon Gremião
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.