Ray O Bahado-Singh1, Argyro Syngelaki2, Ranjit Akolekar2, Rupsari Mandal3, Trent C Bjondahl3, Beomsoo Han3, Edison Dong3, Samuel Bauer4, Zeynep Alpay-Savasan4, Stewart Graham4, Onur Turkoglu4, David S Wishart5, Kypros H Nicolaides2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI. Electronic address: Ray.bahado-singh@beaumont.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI. 5. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Computing Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform validation studies of previously published and newly derived first-trimester metabolomic algorithms for prediction of early preeclampsia (PE). STUDY DESIGN: Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomic analysis was performed on first-trimester serum in 50 women who subsequently developed early PE and in 108 first-trimester controls. Random stratification and allocation was used to divide cases into a discovery group (30 early PE and 65 controls) for generation of the biomarker model(s) and a validation group (20 early PE and 43 controls) to ensure an unbiased assessment of the predictive algorithms. Cross-validation testing on the different algorithms was performed to confirm their robustness before use. Metabolites, demographic features, clinical characteristics, and uterine Doppler pulsatility index data were evaluated. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity, and specificity of the biomarker models were derived. RESULTS: Validation testing found that the metabolite-only model had an AUC of 0.835 (95% CI, 0.769-0.941) with a 75% sensitivity and 74.4% specificity and for the metabolites plus uterine Doppler pulsatility index model it was 0.916 (95% CI, 0.836-0.996), 90%, and 88.4%, respectively. Predictive metabolites included arginine and 2-hydroxybutyrate, which are known to be involved in vascular dilation, and insulin resistance and impaired glucose regulation, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found confirmatory evidence that first-trimester metabolomic biomarkers can predict future development of early PE.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform validation studies of previously published and newly derived first-trimester metabolomic algorithms for prediction of early preeclampsia (PE). STUDY DESIGN: Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomic analysis was performed on first-trimester serum in 50 women who subsequently developed early PE and in 108 first-trimester controls. Random stratification and allocation was used to divide cases into a discovery group (30 early PE and 65 controls) for generation of the biomarker model(s) and a validation group (20 early PE and 43 controls) to ensure an unbiased assessment of the predictive algorithms. Cross-validation testing on the different algorithms was performed to confirm their robustness before use. Metabolites, demographic features, clinical characteristics, and uterine Doppler pulsatility index data were evaluated. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity, and specificity of the biomarker models were derived. RESULTS: Validation testing found that the metabolite-only model had an AUC of 0.835 (95% CI, 0.769-0.941) with a 75% sensitivity and 74.4% specificity and for the metabolites plus uterine Doppler pulsatility index model it was 0.916 (95% CI, 0.836-0.996), 90%, and 88.4%, respectively. Predictive metabolites included arginine and 2-hydroxybutyrate, which are known to be involved in vascular dilation, and insulin resistance and impaired glucose regulation, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found confirmatory evidence that first-trimester metabolomic biomarkers can predict future development of early PE.
Authors: Rachel S Kelly; Damien C Croteau-Chonka; Amber Dahlin; Hooman Mirzakhani; Ann C Wu; Emily S Wan; Michael J McGeachie; Weiliang Qiu; Joanne E Sordillo; Amal Al-Garawi; Kathryn J Gray; Thomas F McElrath; Vincent J Carey; Clary B Clish; Augusto A Litonjua; Scott T Weiss; Jessica A Lasky-Su Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Rachel S Kelly; Rachel T Giorgio; Bo L Chawes; Natalia I Palacios; Kathryn J Gray; Hoooman Mirzakhani; Ann Wu; Kevin Blighe; Scott T Weiss; Jessica Lasky-Su Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Anthony L Su; Sean M Harris; Elana R Elkin; Alla Karnovsky; Justin A Colacino; Rita Loch-Caruso Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Giovanni Monni; Luigi Atzori; Valentina Corda; Francesca Dessolis; Ambra Iuculano; K Joseph Hurt; Federica Murgia Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-06-25