Literature DB >> 26114505

Cranial Base and Posterior Cranial Vault Asymmetry After Open and Endoscopic Repair of Isolated Lambdoid Craniosynostosis.

Ema Zubovic1, Albert S Woo, Gary B Skolnick, Sybill D Naidoo, Matthew D Smyth, Kamlesh B Patel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that open cranial vault remodeling does not fully address the endocranial deformity. This study aims to compare endoscopic-assisted suturectomy with postoperative molding helmet therapy to traditional open reconstruction by quantifying changes in cranial base morphology and posterior cranial vault asymmetry.
METHODS: Anthropometric measurements were made on pre- and 1-year postoperative three-dimensionally reconstructed computed tomography scans of 12 patients with unilateral lambdoid synostosis (8 open and 4 endoscopic-assisted). Cranial base asymmetry was analyzed using: posterior fossa deflection angle (PFA), petrous ridge angle (PRA), mastoid cant angle (MCA), and vertical and anterior-posterior (A-P) displacement of external acoustic meatus (EAM). Posterior cranial vault asymmetry was quantified by volumetric analysis.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, patients in the open and endoscopic groups were statistically equivalent in PFA, PRA, MCA, and A-P EAM displacement. At 1 year postoperatively, open and endoscopic patients were statistically equivalent in all measures. Mean postoperative PFA for the open and endoscopic groups was 6.6 and 6.4 degrees, PRA asymmetry was 6.4 and 7.6%, MCA was 4.0 and 3.2 degrees, vertical EAM displacement was -2.3 and -2.3 millimeters, and A-P EAM displacement was 6.8 and 7.8 millimeters, respectively. Mean volume asymmetry was significantly improved in both open and endoscopic groups, with no difference in postoperative asymmetry between the 2 groups (P = 0.934).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with both open and endoscopic repair of lambdoid synostosis show persistent cranial base and posterior cranial vault asymmetry. The results of endoscopic-assisted suturectomy with postoperative molding helmet therapy are similar to those of open calvarial vault reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26114505      PMCID: PMC4500679          DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  17 in total

1.  Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program.

Authors:  W D Dupont; W D Plummer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1990-04

2.  Cranial vault growth in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  J B Delashaw; J A Persing; W C Broaddus; J A Jane
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy for treatment of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  John Berry-Candelario; Emily B Ridgway; Ronald T Grondin; Gary F Rogers; Mark R Proctor
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  True lambdoid craniosynostosis: long-term results of surgical and conservative therapy.

Authors:  James M Smartt; Russell R Reid; Davinder J Singh; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Does conventional posterior vault remodeling alter endocranial morphology in patients with true lambdoid synostosis?

Authors:  River M Elliott; James M Smartt; Jesse A Taylor; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Early management of craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomies and cranial orthotic molding therapy.

Authors:  David F Jimenez; Constance M Barone; Cathy C Cartwright; Lynette Baker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Plagiocephaly: differential diagnosis based on endocranial morphology.

Authors:  L J Lo; J L Marsh; T K Pilgram; M W Vannier
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Endoscopic cranial suture release for the treatment of craniosynostosis--is it the future?

Authors:  Mark R Proctor
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Comparison of computed tomographic imaging measurements with clinical findings in children with unilateral lambdoid synostosis.

Authors:  Emilia A Ploplys; Richard A Hopper; Arshad R Muzaffar; Jacqueline R Starr; Anthony M Avellino; Michael L Cunningham; Richard G Ellenbogen; Joseph S Gruss
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Reproducibility of Frankfort horizontal plane on 3D multi-planar reconstructed MR images.

Authors:  Amro Daboul; Christian Schwahn; Grit Schaffner; Silvia Soehnel; Stefanie Samietz; Ahmad Aljaghsi; Mohamad Habes; Mohammad Habes; Katrin Hegenscheid; Ralf Puls; Thomas Klinke; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Anshit Goyal; Victor M Lu; Yagiz U Yolcu; Mohamed Elminawy; David J Daniels
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive Suturectomy and Postoperative Helmet Therapy : Advantages and Limitations.

Authors:  Sangjoon Chong; Kyu-Chang Wang; Ji Hoon Phi; Ji Yeoun Lee; Seung-Ki Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10

3.  Extended experience in parieto-occipital expansion surgery by meander technique-clinical and radiological evaluation.

Authors:  Valentina Pennacchietti; Matthias Schulz; Anna Tietze; Karin Schwarz; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 1.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.