A J Lawson1, L Bernstone2, S K Hall3. 1. Department of Newborn Screening and Biochemical Genetics, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, B4 6NH Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, B9 5ST. 2. Department of Newborn Screening and Biochemical Genetics, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, B4 6NH Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Wythenshawe Hospital, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT. 3. Department of Newborn Screening and Biochemical Genetics, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, B4 6NH UK Newborn Screening Laboratories Network kate@pdsoft.co.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In dried blood spot analysis, punch location and variations in applied sample volume and haematocrit can produce different measured concentrations of analytes. We investigated the magnitude of these effects in newborn screening in the UK. METHODS: Heparinized blood spiked with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), phenylalanine, tyrosine, leucine, methionine, octanoyl carnitine (C8), and immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) was spotted onto filter paper: (i) at a constant haematocrit of 50% at various volumes, and (ii) at a range of haematocrits using a constant volume. Subpunches (3.2 mm) of the dried blood spots were then analysed. RESULTS: Compared with a central punch from a 50 µL blood spot with 50% haematocrit, 10 µL spots can have significantly lower measured concentrations of all analytes, with decreases of 15% or more observed for leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine. Punching at the edge of a spot can increase measured concentrations up to 35%. Higher haematocrit decreased measured TSH and C8 yet increased amino acids and IRT by 15% compared with 50% haematocrit. Lower haematocrits had the opposite effect, but only with higher concentrations of some analytes. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in blood spot size, haematocrit and punch location substantially affect measured concentrations for analytes used in the UK newborn screening programme, and this could affect false positive and negative rates. To minimize analytical bias, these variables should be controlled or adjusted for where possible.
OBJECTIVE: In dried blood spot analysis, punch location and variations in applied sample volume and haematocrit can produce different measured concentrations of analytes. We investigated the magnitude of these effects in newborn screening in the UK. METHODS: Heparinized blood spiked with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), phenylalanine, tyrosine, leucine, methionine, octanoyl carnitine (C8), and immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) was spotted onto filter paper: (i) at a constant haematocrit of 50% at various volumes, and (ii) at a range of haematocrits using a constant volume. Subpunches (3.2 mm) of the dried blood spots were then analysed. RESULTS: Compared with a central punch from a 50 µL blood spot with 50% haematocrit, 10 µL spots can have significantly lower measured concentrations of all analytes, with decreases of 15% or more observed for leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine. Punching at the edge of a spot can increase measured concentrations up to 35%. Higher haematocrit decreased measured TSH and C8 yet increased amino acids and IRT by 15% compared with 50% haematocrit. Lower haematocrits had the opposite effect, but only with higher concentrations of some analytes. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in blood spot size, haematocrit and punch location substantially affect measured concentrations for analytes used in the UK newborn screening programme, and this could affect false positive and negative rates. To minimize analytical bias, these variables should be controlled or adjusted for where possible.
Authors: Esther van Dam; Anne Daly; Gineke Venema-Liefaard; Margreet van Rijn; Terry G J Derks; Patrick J McKiernan; M Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema; Anita MacDonald; Francjan J van Spronsen Journal: JIMD Rep Date: 2017-01-25
Authors: Laia Bassaganyas; George Freedman; Dedeepya Vaka; Eunice Wan; Richard Lao; Flavia Chen; Mark Kvale; Robert J Currier; Jennifer M Puck; Pui-Yan Kwok Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: A M J van Wegberg; A MacDonald; K Ahring; A Bélanger-Quintana; N Blau; A M Bosch; A Burlina; J Campistol; F Feillet; M Giżewska; S C Huijbregts; S Kearney; V Leuzzi; F Maillot; A C Muntau; M van Rijn; F Trefz; J H Walter; F J van Spronsen Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Stuart J Moat; Danja Schulenburg-Brand; Hugh Lemonde; James R Bonham; Cas W Weykamp; Joanne V Mei; Graham S Shortland; Rachel S Carling Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2019-10-02 Impact factor: 4.750
Authors: Nora Céspedes; Angela Valencia; Carlos Alberto Echeverry; Maria Isabel Arce-Plata; Cristóbal Colón; Daisy E Castiñeiras; Paula Margarita Hurtado; Jose Angel Cocho; Sócrates Herrera; Myriam Arévalo-Herrera Journal: Colomb Med (Cali) Date: 2017-09-30