Literature DB >> 26112981

[Clinical assessment of olfactory performance - why patient interviews are not enough : A report on lessons learned in planning studies with anosmic patients].

V Schöpf1, K Kollndorfer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Olfactory dysfunction and loss of smell are mostly associated with an immense decrease in the quality of life. The aim of the presented study was to report on particularities in the acquisition of patients with olfactory dysfunction.
METHODS: During July 2011 and May 2014 we were contacted by 300 potential patients with self-reported loss of smell, 95 (54 female, 41 male, mean age 53) of which were invited for clinical testing after phone interviews.
RESULTS: Clinical smell testing revealed 46 patients with anosmia, 38 with hyposmia, and 11 with normosmia. Self-assessment of olfactory function only correlated with clinical scores if patients had nearly no olfactory function left. The ability of self-assessment of olfactory function was independent of age or sex. Further, most patients were not able to report on the reason for or the duration of their olfactory dysfunction. DISCUSSION: Our report shows that patients with olfactory dysfunction are hardly ever ably to assess their grade of performance reduction. Awareness among patients with a reduced sense of smell is of great general importance, since it can be an indicator of neurodegenerative diseases. This should especially be noted for patients older than 50 who are not able to indicate a reason for their loss of smell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26112981     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-015-0017-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  22 in total

1.  Ratings of overall olfactory function.

Authors:  B N Landis; T Hummel; M Hugentobler; R Giger; J S Lacroix
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  A longitudinal descriptive study of self-reported abnormal smell and taste perception in pregnant women.

Authors:  Steven Nordin; Daniel A Broman; Jonas K Olofsson; Marianne Wulff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Consequences of olfactory loss and adopted coping strategies.

Authors:  Ebba Hedén Blomqvist; Annika Brämerson; Pär Stjärne; Steven Nordin
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 4.  OLAF: standardization of international olfactory tests.

Authors:  C Hummel; G M Zucco; E Iannilli; W Maboshe; B N Landis; T Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Olfactory disorders and quality of life--an updated review.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Steven Nordin; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults.

Authors:  Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Marina Barresi; Rosella Ciurleo; Sabrina Giacoppo; Valeria Foti Cuzzola; Debora Celi; Placido Bramanti; Silvia Marino
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss.

Authors:  Andreas F P Temmel; Christian Quint; Bettina Schickinger-Fischer; Ludger Klimek; Elisabeth Stoller; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-06

9.  Olfactory training is helpful in postinfectious olfactory loss: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study.

Authors:  Michael Damm; Louisa K Pikart; Heike Reimann; Silke Burkert; Önder Göktas; Boris Haxel; Sabine Frey; Ioannis Charalampakis; Achim Beule; Berthold Renner; Thomas Hummel; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  The impact of olfactory dysfunction on interoceptive awareness.

Authors:  Jacqueline Krajnik; Kathrin Kollndorfer; Lisbeth A Notter; Christian A Mueller; Veronika Schöpf
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Inaccurate Self-Reporting of Olfactory Dysfunction in Older US Adults.

Authors:  Dara R Adams; Kristen E Wroblewski; David W Kern; Michael J Kozloski; William Dale; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Anosmia-A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Sanne Boesveldt; Elbrich M Postma; Duncan Boak; Antje Welge-Luessen; Veronika Schöpf; Joel D Mainland; Jeffrey Martens; John Ngai; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  The inability to self-evaluate smell performance. How the vividness of mental images outweighs awareness of olfactory performance.

Authors:  Kathrin Kollndorfer; Ksenia Kowalczyk; Stefanie Nell; Jacqueline Krajnik; Christian A Mueller; Veronika Schöpf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.