UNLABELLED: Article-at-a-Glance Background: The lack of patient engagement in quality improvement is concerning. As part of an enterprisewide initiative to redesign primary care at UW Health, interdisciplinary primary care teams received training in patient engagement. METHODS: Organizational stakeholders held a structured discussion and used nominal group technique to identify the key components critical to fostering a culture of patient engagement and critical lessons learned. These findings were augmented and illustrated by review of transcripts of two focus groups held with clinic managers and 69 interviews with individual microsystem team members. RESULTS: From late 2009 to 2014, 47 (81%) of 58 teams have engaged patients in various stages of practice improvement projects. Organizational components identified as critical to fostering a culture of patient engagement were alignment of the organization's vision that guided the redesign with national priorities, readily available external experts, involvement of all care team members in patient engagement, integration within an existing continuous improvement team development program, and an intervention deliberately matched to organizational readiness. Critical lessons learned were the need to embed patient engagement into current improvement activities, designate a neutral point person(s) or group to navigate organizational complexities, commit resources to support patient engagement activities, and plan for sustained team-patient interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Current national health care policy and local market pressures are compelling partnering with patients in efforts to improve the value of the health care delivery system. The UW Health experience may be useful for organizations seeking to introduce or strengthen the patient role in designing delivery system improvements.
UNLABELLED: Article-at-a-Glance Background: The lack of patient engagement in quality improvement is concerning. As part of an enterprisewide initiative to redesign primary care at UW Health, interdisciplinary primary care teams received training in patient engagement. METHODS: Organizational stakeholders held a structured discussion and used nominal group technique to identify the key components critical to fostering a culture of patient engagement and critical lessons learned. These findings were augmented and illustrated by review of transcripts of two focus groups held with clinic managers and 69 interviews with individual microsystem team members. RESULTS: From late 2009 to 2014, 47 (81%) of 58 teams have engaged patients in various stages of practice improvement projects. Organizational components identified as critical to fostering a culture of patient engagement were alignment of the organization's vision that guided the redesign with national priorities, readily available external experts, involvement of all care team members in patient engagement, integration within an existing continuous improvement team development program, and an intervention deliberately matched to organizational readiness. Critical lessons learned were the need to embed patient engagement into current improvement activities, designate a neutral point person(s) or group to navigate organizational complexities, commit resources to support patient engagement activities, and plan for sustained team-patient interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Current national health care policy and local market pressures are compelling partnering with patients in efforts to improve the value of the health care delivery system. The UW Health experience may be useful for organizations seeking to introduce or strengthen the patient role in designing delivery system improvements.
Authors: Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Carlos Roberto Jaen; Elizabeth E Stewart; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Robert A Berenson; Terry Hammons; David N Gans; Stephen Zuckerman; Katie Merrell; William S Underwood; Aimee F Williams Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Eugene C Nelson; Paul B Batalden; Thomas P Huber; Julie J Mohr; Marjorie M Godfrey; Linda A Headrick; John H Wasson Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Improv Date: 2002-09
Authors: Nancy Pandhi; Nora Jacobson; Madison Crowder; Andrew Quanbeck; Mollie Hass; Sarah Davis Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Matthew DeCamp; Vadim Dukhanin; Lindsay C Hebert; Sarah Himmelrich; Scott Feeser; Scott A Berkowitz Journal: J Healthc Manag Date: 2019 Sep-Oct
Authors: Karin E Johnson; Tracy M Mroz; Marie Abraham; Marlaine Figueroa Gray; Mary Minniti; Wendy Nickel; Robert Reid; Jennifer Sweeney; Dominick L Frosch; Debra L Ness; Clarissa Hsu Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Amy D Waterman; Jim Gleason; Louise Lerminiaux; Emily H Wood; Alexander Berrios; Laurie A Meacham; Anne Osuji; Rachyl Pines; John D Peipert Journal: Curr Transplant Rep Date: 2020-09-01
Authors: Sarah Davis; Stephanie Berkson; Martha E Gaines; Pratik Prajapati; William Schwab; Nancy Pandhi; Susan Edgman-Levitan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.128