Literature DB >> 26109630

Phase II/III study of second-line chemotherapy comparing irinotecan-alone with S-1 plus irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer refractory to first-line treatment with S-1 (JACCRO GC-05).

K Tanabe1, M Fujii2, K Nishikawa3, C Kunisaki4, A Tsuji5, N Matsuhashi6, A Takagane7, T Ohno8, T Kawase9, M Kochi10, K Yoshida6, Y Kakeji11, W Ichikawa12, K Chin13, M Terashima14, M Takeuchi15, T Nakajima16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Japan, S-1 plus cisplatin has been used as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Patients with no response to first-line treatment with S-1 often receive a taxane-alone or irinotecan-alone as second-line treatment. However, second-line treatment with S-1 plus irinotecan is widely used in patients with AGC resistant to first-line S-1-based chemotherapy. The goal of this trial was to determine whether the consecutive use of S-1 plus irinotecan improves survival when compared with irinotecan-alone as second-line treatment for AGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had disease progression during first-line S-1-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 plus irinotecan or irinotecan-alone. The S-1 plus irinotecan group received oral S-1 (40-60 mg/m(2)) on days 1-14 and intravenous irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The irinotecan-alone group received the same dose of irinotecan intravenously on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: From February 2008 to May 2011, a total of 304 patients were enrolled. The median OS was 8.8 months in the S-1 plus irinotecan group and 9.5 months in the irinotecan-alone group. This difference was not significant (hazard ratio for death, 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.25; P = 0.92). Grade 3 or higher toxicities were more common in the S-1 plus irinotecan group than in the irinotecan-alone group.
CONCLUSION: The consecutive use of S-1 plus irinotecan is not recommended as second-line treatment in patients who are refractory to S-1-based first-line chemotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00639327.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  S-1; gastric cancer; irinotecan; second-line chemotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26109630     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  12 in total

Review 1.  Second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Daisuke Takahari
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  Gastric cancer surgery: historical background and perspective in Western countries versus Japan.

Authors:  Chun-Dong Zhang; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Current therapeutic landscape for advanced gastroesophageal cancers.

Authors:  Anthony Lopez; Kazuto Harada; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

4.  Meta-analysis of two randomized phase III trials (TCOG GI-0801 and ECRIN TRICS) of biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Nishikawa; Wasaburo Koizumi; Akira Tsuburaya; Takeharu Yamanaka; Satoshi Morita; Kazumasa Fujitani; Yusuke Akamaru; Ken Shimada; Hisashi Hosaka; Norisuke Nakayama; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  A Bayesian network meta-analysis on second-line systemic therapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaofu Zhu; Yoo-Joung Ko; Scott Berry; Keya Shah; Esther Lee; Kelvin Chan
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Second- and third-line systemic therapy in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Emil Ter Veer; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Gert van Valkenhoef; Lok Lam Ngai; Rosa M A Mali; Martijn G H van Oijen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 9.264

7.  A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine.

Authors:  Keun-Wook Lee; Bum Jun Kim; Mi-Jung Kim; Hye Sook Han; Jin Won Kim; Young Iee Park; Sook Ryun Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yoko Tomita; Max Moldovan; Rachael Chang Lee; Amy Hc Hsieh; Amanda Townsend; Timothy Price
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-19

Review 9.  Doublet Versus Single Agent as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Bing Ma; Xiao-Tian Huang; Yan-Song Li; Yu Wang; Zhou-Lu Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Irinotecan-containing doublet treatment versus irinotecan monotherapy as second-line choice for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Liuting Yang; Xiaoyue Jiang; Han Yan; Yingying Li; Hongchao Zhen; Bingmei Chang; Seyed Kariminia; Qin Li
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.