Literature DB >> 26109557

AGO Austria recommendations for genetic testing of patients with ovarian cancer.

Christian Marth1, Michael Hubalek, Edgar Petru, Stephan Polterauer, Alexander Reinthaller, Christian Schauer, Tonja Scholl-Firon, Christian F Singer, Johannes Zschocke, Alain G Zeimet.   

Abstract

In Austria, 700 women are diagnosed every year with ovarian carcinoma. Approximately 15% of the patients with epithelial ovarian cancer have a germline mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The increased incidence of breast and/or ovarian cancer in genetically related family members has given rise to the term "hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome" (HBOC). Some 25-55% of these in-family diseases are attributed to germline mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2, and approximately 5-10% to other known tumor predisposition syndromes. The remaining persons may carry mutations in as yet unidentified genes. HBOC caused by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is an autosomal dominant disorder with high penetrance. BRCA1 and BRCA2 encode for so-called tumor suppressor proteins. Inherited functional mutations of these genes cause loss of function of the respective allele. Loss of function of the second allele causes complete loss of the corresponding protein and facilitates the development of a malignancy.The Association of Gynecologic Oncology recommends that testing for a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 should be offered to all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. When mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or other cancer-susceptibility genes have been identified, patients with ovarian carcinoma can be treated with new, innovative therapies. This recommendation is intended as a standard guideline for genetic testing of patients with an ovarian carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26109557      PMCID: PMC4536270          DOI: 10.1007/s00508-015-0814-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


Breast carcinomas and ovarian carcinomas

In its guideline issued in May 2011, the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics took a standpoint on prevention and early diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancers in high-risk patients. From this recommendation, the indication for molecular genetic analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 was defined [1]: Indications for molecular genetic analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 This remains the basis for recommending genetic testing and meets the criteria for the cost to be paid by the Austrian national medical insurance system. In Tyrol, Austria, the German S3 Guideline was incorporated into the recommendations of the Tyrolean Working Group for Clinical Oncology (TAKO) [2]. TAKO recommendations: In general, a greater than 10 % prevalence of the mutation should be the threshold to recommend genetic testing. Even the very conservative National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends a genetic test at a calculated risk of 10 % or more [3]. Until now, the costs for genetic testing in patients with an ovarian carcinoma have been covered only when the family history was positive, which meant that additional family members usually must have been diagnosed with ovarian and/or breast cancer. Recent findings, however, have shown that up to 15 % of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer have germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 [4, 5]. Half of these patients have no apparent family history for ovarian cancer. This may be due, on the one hand, to the absence of female relatives, and on the other hand, to the insufficient knowledge of the family medical history. Germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are associated with early-onset breast cancer. For ovarian cancer, the correlation with age is less clear, as 35 % of the patients with hereditary ovarian cancer are of the age of 60 + years at the time of diagnosis. In addition to germline mutations, at least another 2–8 % of ovarian cancers have somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations [5], so that up to 20 % of patients with ovarian cancer have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiency triggered by a mutation. In addition, it is also known that 9–14 % of nonmutated ovarian cancers bear an epigenetic silencing of the BRCA1 gene due to promoter hypermethylation [6]. Identification of a BRCA mutation has many consequences. One of them is that patients with a mutation-induced BRCA dysfunction have better survival and respond better to platinum therapy. Furthermore, a BRCA germline mutation is also associated with a risk for other tumors, particularly breast cancer. Such patients can decide to undergo an intensive early detection program or prophylactic surgery. Identification of a germline mutation also provides important information for other family members and their potential tumor risk, and permits personalized preventive measures to be outlined for high-risk persons. Genetic testing has taken on special importance through the introduction of new therapeutic possibilities using so-called “PARP (Poly ADP ribose polymerase) inhibitors” that are particularly effective in the case of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation [7]. New technologies such as “next general sequencing” reduce the cost of genetic testing and permit additional genes to be tested. Blood samples taken in two GOG studies (GOG 218 and GOG 262) were subjected to genetic testing and showed a BRCA1/2 mutation in 13.7 % of the patients with ovarian carcinoma, as well as mutations in other genes, in particular BRIP1, PALB2, CHEK2, NBN, and ATM, in 5.6 % of the patients [8]. The new testing methods pose special challenges for interpretation of the genetic data, knowledge of a wide range of cancer predispositions, and genetic counseling. On the basis of these new findings, the Association of Gynecologic Oncology (AGO) Austria makes the following recommendations for women with ovarian cancer: Genetic testing for BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations should be offered to all patients with an epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Patients with borderline ovarian tumors or nonepithelial ovarian tumors and who do not meet the criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma cannot be expected to benefit from testing. Before germline mutation analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in genomic DNA, the patient must undergo formal genetic counseling with regard to the possibility of a hereditary predisposition and must give her written consent for testing. The test results must be explained to the patient in a second personal genetic counselling session by a Medical Geneticist or a medical specialist for the particular indication as defined by the Austrian Gentechnikgesetz (GTG, Genetic Engineering Act). Counselling must be concluded with a counselling letter that contains all relevant points of the discussion, including the relevance of the findings for the patient’s family. Before carrying out a genetic analysis of DNA isolated from tumor tissue that may potentially identify a germline mutation for example in BRCA1 or BRCA2, the patient must be informed of the potential relevance of the test results for herself or other family members and must give her written consent for the test (for download see: AGO patient information sheet at: www.ago-austria.at). If a probable germline mutation is identified in the tumor tissue, the test results must be conveyed to the patient by genetic counseling in compliance with the Austrian GTG. The patient must be informed about the relevance of the test results for herself and other family members as well as the possibilities for further work-up, and she must be offered the opportunity for germline mutation testing in genomic DNA (typically isolated from blood). In view of the great significance for prognosis and treatment, especially, for possible PARP inhibitor therapy, not only a test for germline mutation, using DNA from a blood sample, but also quality-controlled testing of the tumor material should be performed. In an effort to personalize medicine, the AGO explicitly supports all innovative steps that promote the use of new technologies such as “next generation sequencing” to test for not only the two most common mutated genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, but also other genes involved in the homologous recombination repair of DNA as well as other relevant genes for ovarian cancer biology. In addition to testing solely for sequence alterations, assays should be developed in the future that also use, for example, epigenetic or functional analysis to better characterize tumor cells.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no actual or potential conflicts of interest related to this article.
Two breast cancer cases before age of 50 years
Three breast cancer cases before age of 60 years
One breast cancer case before age of 35 years
One breast cancer case before age of 50 years and one ovarian cancer case at any age
Two ovarian cancer cases at any age
Male and female breast cancer at any age
Only one affected person in a family
Breast cancer with first occurrence before age of 35 years
Bilateral breast cancer with first occurrence before age of 50 years
Both breast and ovarian cancer at any age
Multiple cases on the same side of a family
Two women with breast cancer, one with first occurrence before age of 50 years
One woman with breast cancer and one woman with ovarian cancer
Two women with ovarian cancer
Three or more women with breast cancer
One man with breast cancer and one woman with breast or ovarian cancer
  5 in total

1.  [Guideline for the prevention and early detection of breast and ovarian cancer in high risk patients, particularly in women from HBOC (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer) families].

Authors:  Christian F Singer; Muy-Kheng Tea; Gunda Pristauz; Michael Hubalek; Christine Rappaport; Christopher Riedl; Thomas Helbich
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Jenny Permuth-Wey; Judith A Betts; Jeffrey P Krischer; James Fiorica; Hector Arango; James LaPolla; Mitchell Hoffman; Martin A Martino; Katie Wakeley; George Wilbanks; Santo Nicosia; Alan Cantor; Rebecca Sutphen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Susan J Ramus; Simon A Gayther
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Ledermann; Philipp Harter; Charlie Gourley; Michael Friedlander; Ignace Vergote; Gordon Rustin; Clare Scott; Werner Meier; Ronnie Shapira-Frommer; Tamar Safra; Daniela Matei; Euan Macpherson; Claire Watkins; James Carmichael; Ursula Matulonis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical characteristics of ovarian cancer classified by BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51C status.

Authors:  J M Cunningham; M S Cicek; N B Larson; J Davila; C Wang; M C Larson; H Song; E M Dicks; P Harrington; M Wick; B J Winterhoff; H Hamidi; G E Konecny; J Chien; M Bibikova; J-B Fan; K R Kalli; N M Lindor; B L Fridley; P P D Pharoah; E L Goode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  BRCA1/2 germline testing in non-mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: changing international practice and implications for service provision.

Authors:  Maria Coakley; Vicki Cleary; Nicholas Power; Seamus O'Reilly
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Delivering widespread BRCA testing and PARP inhibition to patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Angela George; Stan Kaye; Susana Banerjee
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Changes of Socio-demographic data of clients seeking genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer due to the "Angelina Jolie Effect".

Authors:  Christine Staudigl; Georg Pfeiler; Katharina Hrauda; Romana Renz; Andreas Berger; Renate Lichtenschopf; Christian F Singer; Muy-Kheng M Tea
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Implementing rapid, robust, cost-effective, patient-centred, routine genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Angela George; Daniel Riddell; Sheila Seal; Sabrina Talukdar; Shazia Mahamdallie; Elise Ruark; Victoria Cloke; Ingrid Slade; Zoe Kemp; Martin Gore; Ann Strydom; Susana Banerjee; Helen Hanson; Nazneen Rahman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations Among Patients With Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, and Fallopian Tube Cancer in India: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sudeep Gupta; Senthil Rajappa; Suresh Advani; Amit Agarwal; Shyam Aggarwal; Chanchal Goswami; Satya Dattatreya Palanki; Devavrat Arya; Shekhar Patil; Rohit Kodagali
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.