Literature DB >> 26108091

Relationship Between Hospital Performance on a Patient Satisfaction Survey and Surgical Quality.

Greg D Sacks1, Elise H Lawson1, Aaron J Dawes1, Marcia M Russell1, Melinda Maggard-Gibbons1, David S Zingmond2, Clifford Y Ko1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services include patient experience as a core component of its Value-Based Purchasing program, which ties financial incentives to hospital performance on a range of quality measures. However, it remains unclear whether patient satisfaction is an accurate marker of high-quality surgical care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital performance on a patient satisfaction survey is associated with objective measures of surgical quality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective observational study of participating American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS NSQIP) hospitals. We used data from a linked database of Medicare inpatient claims, ACS NSQIP, the American Hospital Association annual survey, and Hospital Compare from December 2, 2004, through December 31, 2008. A total of 103 866 patients older than 65 years undergoing inpatient surgery were included. Hospitals were grouped by quartile based on their performance on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. Controlling for preoperative risk factors, we created hierarchical logistic regression models to predict the occurrence of adverse postoperative outcomes based on a hospital's patient satisfaction scores. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Thirty-day postoperative mortality, major and minor complications, failure to rescue, and hospital readmission.
RESULTS: Of the 180 hospitals, the overall mean patient satisfaction score was 68.0% (first quartile mean, 58.7%; fourth quartile mean, 76.7%). Compared with patients treated at hospitals in the lowest quartile, those at the highest quartile had significantly lower risk-adjusted odds of death (odds ratio = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.99), failure to rescue (odds ratio = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96), and minor complication (odds ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99). This translated to relative risk reductions of 11.1% (P = .04), 12.6% (P = .02), and 11.5% (P = .04), respectively. No significant relationship was noted between patient satisfaction and either major complication or hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using a national sample of hospitals, we demonstrated a significant association between patient satisfaction scores and several objective measures of surgical quality. Our findings suggest that payment policies that incentivize better patient experience do not require hospitals to sacrifice performance on other quality measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26108091     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  41 in total

1.  Editorial-Measuring Satisfaction: Can It Be Done?

Authors:  David Ring; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders.

Authors:  Michael L Pezold; Andrea L Pusic; Wess A Cohen; James P Hollenberg; Zeeshan Butt; David R Flum; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Readmissions and Other Measures of Hospital Quality.

Authors:  Seppo T Rinne; Jose Castaneda; Peter K Lindenauer; Paul D Cleary; Harold L Paz; Jose L Gomez
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores and gynecologic oncology surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph A Dottino; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Shuangshuang Fu; Karen H Lu; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Jessica I Billig; Erika D Sears; Breanna N Travis; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The association of mental health program characteristics and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Austin B Frakt; Jodie Trafton; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Patient Satisfaction in the Preoperative Period: Preparing for Hand Surgery.

Authors:  William R Smith; Jeffrey Wera; Frederick V Ramsey; Robert Takei; Greg Gallant; Frederic Liss; Pedro Beredjiklian; Moody Kwok
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-03-05

8.  Satisfaction with surgeon care as measured by the Surgery-CAHPS survey is not related to NSQIP outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan K Schmocker; Linda M Cherney Stafford; Emily R Winslow
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Do health insurance and hospital market concentration influence hospital patients' experience of care?

Authors:  Caroline Hanson; Bradley Herring; Erin Trish
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Physician-Owned Surgical Hospitals Outperform Other Hospitals in Medicare Value-Based Purchasing Program.

Authors:  Adriana G Ramirez; Margaret C Tracci; George J Stukenborg; Florence E Turrentine; Benjamin D Kozower; R Scott Jones
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.