| Literature DB >> 26107617 |
Pedro Jacquez1, Gustavo Avila2, Kyle Boone3, Agamyrat Altiyev3, Jens Puschhof1, Roland Sauter1, Emma Arigi1, Blanca Ruiz1, Xiuli Peng4, Igor Almeida1, Michael Sherman5, Chuan Xiao2, Jianjun Sun1.
Abstract
Anthrax toxin receptors act as molecular clamps or switches that controlEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26107617 PMCID: PMC4479931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
EM Data collection and image processing of negatively stained samples.
| Samples | Defocus (μM) | Micrographs (Used) | Particles (Used) | Resolution (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA-TF-R318 | 0.53–1.82 | 28 | 3784 | 17.4 |
| PA-TF-R318 (4C/A) | 0.89–1.74 | 45 | 3746 | 16.2 |
| PA-R318 | 0.53–1.50 | 65 | 3387 | 13.8 |
| PA-R318(C255/279A) | 0.52–1.52 | 85 | 3852 | 13.1 |
Fig 1The residues C255/C279 and C230/C315 form two disulfide bonds in the Ig domain of ANTXR2.
A. In the ANTXR2 ectodomain (residues 38–318), C255/C279 and C230/C315 form two disulfide bonds in the Ig domain (residues 219–318). B. The purified TF-R318 and the C/A mutants of TF-R318 as indicated were run in SDS-PAGE, stained by Coomassie blue. C. R318 and the R318 C/A mutants were purified after removal of TF tags and run in SDS-PAGE, followed by Coomassie blue staining.
Fig 2Mutations of C255A/C279A, but not C230A/C315A, inhibited the PA-induced ANTS fluorescence dequenching in the liposomes.
3 nM of heptameric prepore (PA63)7 was mixed with 40 nM of the purified receptor domains as indicated, and then incubated with the liposomes doped with ANTS/DPX. Pore formation was triggered by acidification, and ANTS dequenching was measured at 435 nm with excitation at 380 nm. The representative curves of ANTS fluorescence were shown in A. Relative ANTS fluorescence intensity at 60 seconds of post-acidification was quantified from three independent repeats and shown in B. The relative rates of fluorescence dequenching were calculated in SigmaPlot as described in Materials and Methods and shown in C.
Fig 3Disulfide deletion did not affect PA prepore-to-pore conversion.
A. 5 μg of (PA63)7 was incubated with a 3-fold molar concentration of the purified receptor domains as indicated in pH 8.5 buffer for 30 min in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2. The pH of the buffers either remained constant or dropped to pH 5.0. Subsequently, the formation of SDS-resistant oligomers was examined in SDS-PAGE, followed by Coomassie blue stain. B. 3 nM of the pyrene-labeled PA(N306C) heptamer was mixed with 40 nM of R218, R318 and the R318 C/A mutants as indicated in pH 8.5 buffer. Conversion of prepore to pore was triggered by acidification (pH 5.0) and measured by pyrene fluorescence at 475 nm with excitation at 345 nm. The representative curves of pyrene fluorescence were shown. C. The relative intensity of pyrene fluorescence at 15 seconds of post-acidification was calculated from three independent measurements. D. The relative rates of pyrene fluorescence were calculated in SigmaPlot as described in Materials and Methods.
Fig 4Deletion of the disulfide bond C255-C279 inhibited membrane insertion of the PA pore.
A. 3 nM of NBD-labeled PA(G305C) heptamer was first bound to the receptor domains as indicated in pH 8.5 buffer. Then the PA-receptor complexes were incubated with the liposomes containing Ni-chelating lipids on the membranes. Membrane insertion was triggered by acidification (pH 5.0). The NDB fluorescence was measured at 544 nm with excitation at 488 nm. B. As controls, the NBD-labeled PA-receptor complexes were acidified without the presence of liposomes. The representative curves from three independent measurements were shown.
Fig 5Mutations of C255A/C279A, but not C230A/C315A, resulted in a significant conformational change on the receptor ectodomain.
5 μM of the purified receptor domains were incubated in the 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.3), 100 mM NaCl, in the presence or absence of 5 mM TCEP. The intrinsic Trp59 fluorescence spectrum was measured with excitation at 290 nm and emission at 300–370 nm. Note: two distinct spectrum peaks (320 nm and 330 nm) were detected and represented as two distinct conformations, denoted as C1 and C2.
Fig 6Homology modeling of the Ig domain and docking of the atomic structure into the reconstructed EM maps.
A. The structure of the Ig domain is generated by homologous modeling and grafted to the crystal structure of the VWA domain through energy minimization. The secondary structure is colored as α-helices in orange, β-sheets in purple and loops in grey. The disulfide bonds C39-C218, C255-C279 and C230-C315 are shown as stick models, colored in yellow. Note: Trp59 is shown in a sphere model and labeled. B, D, and F are ribbon diagrams of PA-R318 heptameric complex viewed from top, bottom and side, respectively. C, E, and G are surface rendered density maps from reconstruction of negatively stained PA-R318 heptameric complex, docked with the modeled structure and viewed from top, bottom and side, respectively. Segmented map density of one subunit of the receptor ectodomain is shown on up-right in E or lower-left in G, respectively. The map was rendered at the level of one standard deviation above the average density value of the map. Within the PA heptamer, each of the seven monomers are colored in red, orange, yellow, green, cyan, magenta, and purple, respectively. The VWA domains and the Ig domains are colored in blue and green, respectively. The reconstructed EM maps are rendered in magenta.
Fig 73D reconstruction of negatively stained PA-TF-R318 and PA-TF-R318(4C/A) detected the disulfide deletion-induced conformational changes on the VWA domain.
A, C, and E are surface rendered density maps of PA-TF-R318 heptameric complex viewed from top, bottom and side. B, D, and F are surface rendered density maps of PA-TF-R318(4C/A) viewed from top, bottom and side. The crystal structure of the PA-VWA heptameric complex was docked in the reconstructed maps. G is the side view of the superposed density maps from PA-TF-R318 (transparent grey) and PA-TF-R318(4C/A) (solid green). H is the side view of the superposed density map from PA-TF-R318 (transparent grey) and PA-R318 (solid magenta) showing high similarity of both maps. I and K are the zoom-in monomeric view for the area at the lower part of the complexes as show in G and H respectively. J is the ribbon diagram of the fitted PA and VWA structure at the same orientation and magnification as in I and K. All of the maps were rendered at the level of three and half times standard deviation above the average density value of the maps. The PA is colored in red and the VWA is colored in blue. Trp59 of VWA is rendered as space-filling model and labeled.
Fig 8Compared to PA-R318, PA-R318(C255/279A) exhibited a significant conformational change on the VWA domain.
A, B, and C are surface rendered density maps of PA-R318 heptameric complex viewed from top, bottom and side in magenta. E, F, and G are surface rendered density maps of PA-R318(C255/279A) viewed from top, bottom and side in cyan. The crystal structure of the PA-VWA heptameric complex was docked in the reconstructed maps. D is the side view of the superimposed density maps from PA-R318 (transparent magenta) and PA-R318(C255/279A) (solid cyan). H is the side view of the superimposed density map from PA-R318 (transparent magenta) and PA-R318(C255/279A) (solid cyan) that shows the missing densities in the VWA domain. I is the ribbon diagram of the crystal structure of the PA-VWA heptamer at the same orientation and magnification as in H. All of the maps were rendered at the level of three and half times standard deviation above the average density value of the maps. The PA is colored in red and the VWA is colored in blue. Trp59 of VWA is rendered as spherical model and labeled.