Literature DB >> 26106803

RELIABILITY AND CRITERION VALIDITY OF A NOVEL CLINICAL TEST OF SIMPLE AND COMPLEX REACTION TIME IN ATHLETES.

James T Eckner1, James K Richardson2, Hogene Kim3, Monica S Joshi3, Youkeun K Oh3, James A Ashton-Miller4.   

Abstract

Slowed reaction time (RT) represents both a risk factor for and a consequence of sport concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and criterion validity of a novel clinical test of simple and complex RT, called RT(clin), in contact sport athletes. Both tasks were adapted from the well-known ruler drop test of RT and involve manually grasping a falling vertical shaft upon its release, with the complex task employing a go/no-go paradigm based on a light cue. In 46 healthy contact sport athletes (24 men; M = 16.3 yr., SD = 5.0; 22 women: M age = 15.0 yr., SD = 4.0) whose sports included soccer, ice hockey, American football, martial arts, wrestling, and lacrosse, the latency and accuracy of simple and complex RT(clin) had acceptable test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities and correlated with a computerized criterion standard, the Axon Computerized Cognitive Assessment Tool. Medium to large effect sizes were found. The novel RT(clin) tests have acceptable reliability and criterion validity for clinical use and hold promise as concussion assessment tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26106803      PMCID: PMC4704438          DOI: 10.2466/25.15.PMS.120v19x6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  35 in total

1.  Reliable change, sensitivity, and specificity of a multidimensional concussion assessment battery: implications for caution in clinical practice.

Authors:  Johna K Register-Mihalik; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Jason P Mihalik; Julianne D Schmidt; Zachary Y Kerr; Michael A McCrea
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.710

2.  Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs.

Authors:  C Thomas Gualtieri; Lynda G Johnson
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Retest reliability in adolescents of a computerized neuropsychological battery used to assess recovery from concussion.

Authors:  Sidney J Segalowitz; Patrick Mahaney; Diane L Santesso; Leslie MacGregor; Jane Dywan; Barry Willer
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  Evaluating a clinical measure of reaction time: an observational study.

Authors:  James T Eckner; Ross D Whitacre; Ned L Kirsch; James K Richardson
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2009-06

5.  Between-seasons test-retest reliability of clinically measured reaction time in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes.

Authors:  James T Eckner; Jeffrey S Kutcher; James K Richardson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Pilot evaluation of a novel clinical test of reaction time in national collegiate athletic association division I football players.

Authors:  James T Eckner; Jeffrey S Kutcher; James K Richardson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Neurocognitive and symptom predictors of recovery in high school athletes.

Authors:  Brian Lau; Mark R Lovell; Michael W Collins; Jamie Pardini
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs.

Authors:  Steven P Broglio; Michael S Ferrara; Stephen N Macciocchi; Ted A Baumgartner; Ronald Elliott
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Evaluation of a simple test of reaction time for baseline concussion testing in a population of high school athletes.

Authors:  James MacDonald; Julie Wilson; Julie Young; Drew Duerson; Gail Swisher; Christy L Collins; William P Meehan
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 10.  American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport.

Authors:  Kimberly G Harmon; Jonathan A Drezner; Matthew Gammons; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Mark Halstead; Stanley A Herring; Jeffrey S Kutcher; Andrea Pana; Margot Putukian; William O Roberts
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  10 in total

1.  Clinical Reaction-Time Performance Factors in Healthy Collegiate Athletes.

Authors:  Jaclyn B Caccese; James T Eckner; Lea Franco-MacKendrick; Joseph B Hazzard; Meng Ni; Steven P Broglio; Thomas W McAllister; Michael McCrea; Thomas A Buckley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Reliability, Validity and Usefulness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task.

Authors:  Haris Pojskic; Jeffrey Pagaduan; Edin Uzicanin; Vlatko Separovic; Miodrag Spasic; Nikola Foretic; Damir Sekulic
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Clinical Evaluation of the Concussed Athlete: A View From the Sideline.

Authors:  Margot Putukian
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Sex Moderates the Relationship between Perceptual-Motor Function and Single-Leg Squatting Mechanics.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hogg; Jason M Avedesian; Jed A Diekfuss; Shellie N Acocello; Rylee D Shimmin; Elisabeth A Kelley; Deborah A Kostrub; Gregory D Myer; Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Interpreting Clinical Reaction Time Change and Recovery After Concussion: A Baseline Versus Norm-Based Cutoff Score Comparison.

Authors:  Jaclyn B Caccese; James T Eckner; Lea Franco-MacKendrick; Joseph B Hazzard; Meng Ni; Steven P Broglio; Thomas W McAllister; Michael A McCrea; Paul F Pasquina; Thomas A Buckley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.824

6.  Evaluating the Recovery Curve for Clinically Assessed Reaction Time After Concussion.

Authors:  Gianluca Del Rossi
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  THE RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL BALANCE TESTS UNDER SINGLE-TASK AND DUAL-TASK TESTING PARADIGMS IN UNINJURED ACTIVE YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULTS.

Authors:  Thaer S Manaseer; Jackie L Whittaker; Codi Isaac; Kathryn Schneider; Mary Roduta Roberts; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08

8.  Test-Retest Reliability and Interpretation of Common Concussion Assessment Tools: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.

Authors:  Steven P Broglio; Barry P Katz; Shi Zhao; Michael McCrea; Thomas McAllister
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Bringing context to balance: development of a reactive balance test within the injury prevention and return to sport domain.

Authors:  Jo Verschueren; Bruno Tassignon; Bert Pluym; Jeroen Van Cutsem; Evert Verhagen; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2019-04-16

10.  What Are We Doing Wrong When Athletes Report Higher Levels of Fatigue From Traveling Than From Training or Competition?

Authors:  Julio Calleja-Gonzalez; Diego Marques-Jimenez; Margaret Jones; Thomas Huyghe; Fernando Navarro; Anne Delextrat; Igor Jukic; Sergej M Ostojic; Jaime E Sampaio; Xavi Schelling; Pedro E Alcaraz; Fernando Sanchez-Bañuelos; Xavier Leibar; Juan Mielgo-Ayuso; Nicolas Terrados
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.