Frances Doran1, Susan Nancarrow2. 1. Senior Lecturer, School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Professor of Health Sciences, School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify the barriers and facilitators to accessing first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world. METHODS: Systematic review of published literature. CINAHL, PubMed, Proquest, MEDLINE, InformIT, Scopus, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier were searched for papers written in the English language, from the developed world, including quantitative and qualitative articles published between 1993 and 2014. RESULTS: The search initially yielded 2511 articles. After screening of title, abstract and removing duplicates, 38 articles were reviewed. From the provider perspective, barriers included moral opposition to abortion, lack of training, too few physicians, staff harassment, and insufficient hospital resources, particularly in rural areas. From the women's perspective, barriers included lack of access to services (including distance and lack of service availability), negative attitudes of staff, and the associated costs of the abortion procedure. Service access could be enhanced by increasing training, particularly for mid-level practitioners; by increasing the range of service options, including the use of telehealth; and by creating clear guidelines and referral procedures to alternative providers when staff have a moral opposition to abortion. CONCLUSION: Despite fewer legal barriers to accessing abortion services, the evidence from this review suggests that women in developed countries still face significant inequities in terms of the level of quality and access to services as recommended by the World Health Organization. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the barriers and facilitators to accessing first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world. METHODS: Systematic review of published literature. CINAHL, PubMed, Proquest, MEDLINE, InformIT, Scopus, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier were searched for papers written in the English language, from the developed world, including quantitative and qualitative articles published between 1993 and 2014. RESULTS: The search initially yielded 2511 articles. After screening of title, abstract and removing duplicates, 38 articles were reviewed. From the provider perspective, barriers included moral opposition to abortion, lack of training, too few physicians, staff harassment, and insufficient hospital resources, particularly in rural areas. From the women's perspective, barriers included lack of access to services (including distance and lack of service availability), negative attitudes of staff, and the associated costs of the abortion procedure. Service access could be enhanced by increasing training, particularly for mid-level practitioners; by increasing the range of service options, including the use of telehealth; and by creating clear guidelines and referral procedures to alternative providers when staff have a moral opposition to abortion. CONCLUSION: Despite fewer legal barriers to accessing abortion services, the evidence from this review suggests that women in developed countries still face significant inequities in terms of the level of quality and access to services as recommended by the World Health Organization. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
abortion; family planning service provision; reproductive health politics; service delivery
Authors: Mónica Frederico; Kristien Michielsen; Carlos Arnaldo; Peter Decat Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Abigail R A Aiken; Jennifer E Starling; Alexandra van der Wal; Sascha van der Vliet; Kathleen Broussard; Dana M Johnson; Elisa Padron; Rebecca Gomperts; James G Scott Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 11.561